| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
... | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Transcribe
https://github.com/mit-plv/fiat-crypto/issues/157#issuecomment-301334813
Not sure if it's right, but now I'll try proofs.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
As per
https://github.com/mit-plv/fiat-crypto/issues/157#issuecomment-307212425
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fix the algorithm to not talk about join, based on
http://colinandmargaret.co.uk/Research/CDW_ELL_99.pdf (p2) and
discussions over Signal with @andres-erbsen.
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Partial progress with @andres-erbsen
|
|
|
|
| |
With help from Andres
|
|
|
|
| |
With help from Jade.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I think I got the loop itself wrong, though:
1. I'm worried that it'll overflow off the end of the positional
representation, since I'm not actually dividing by 2^s
2. I'm not carrying/reducing anywhere, so the getting the nth value
might be wrong
3. I'm not sure if I got indexing right.
But I want to submit this early version to get comments, before I put
more effort into it.
|
|
|