From 705f66a9caa90a32d424270d3bc99ae31925c9f2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Gustavo Lima Chaves Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2018 16:29:09 -0700 Subject: Account for missing change on commit "Remove SimpleThreadPool and..." "... always use {NonBlocking}ThreadPool". It seems the non-blocking implementation was me the default/only one, but a reference to the old name was left unmodified. Fix that. --- unsupported/test/cxx11_non_blocking_thread_pool.cpp | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'unsupported/test/cxx11_non_blocking_thread_pool.cpp') diff --git a/unsupported/test/cxx11_non_blocking_thread_pool.cpp b/unsupported/test/cxx11_non_blocking_thread_pool.cpp index 5a8080ea3..e73a034b1 100644 --- a/unsupported/test/cxx11_non_blocking_thread_pool.cpp +++ b/unsupported/test/cxx11_non_blocking_thread_pool.cpp @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ static void test_create_destroy_empty_pool() // Just create and destroy the pool. This will wind up and tear down worker // threads. Ensure there are no issues in that logic. for (int i = 0; i < 16; ++i) { - NonBlockingThreadPool tp(i); + ThreadPool tp(i); } } @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ static void test_parallelism(bool allow_spinning) { // Test we never-ever fail to match available tasks with idle threads. const int kThreads = 16; // code below expects that this is a multiple of 4 - NonBlockingThreadPool tp(kThreads, allow_spinning); + ThreadPool tp(kThreads, allow_spinning); VERIFY_IS_EQUAL(tp.NumThreads(), kThreads); VERIFY_IS_EQUAL(tp.CurrentThreadId(), -1); for (int iter = 0; iter < 100; ++iter) { @@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ static void test_parallelism(bool allow_spinning) static void test_cancel() { - NonBlockingThreadPool tp(2); + ThreadPool tp(2); // Schedule a large number of closure that each sleeps for one second. This // will keep the thread pool busy for much longer than the default test timeout. -- cgit v1.2.3