| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|---|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
- Dynamic is now an invalid value
- introduce a HugeCost constant to be used for runtime-cost values or arbitrarily huge cost
- add sanity checks for cost values: must be >=0 and not too large
This change provides several benefits:
- it fixes shortcoming is some cost computation where the Dynamic case was not properly handled.
- it simplifies cost computation logic, and should avoid future similar shortcomings.
- it allows to distinguish between different level of dynamic/huge/infinite cost
- it should enable further simplifications in the computation of costs (save compilation time)
|
| |
|
|
| |
evaluation of nested expression
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
vectorwise/replicate expressions involving partial reduxions
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
|
|
* add lots of static assertions making it very explicit when all these ops
are supposed to work:
** all ops require the rhs vector to go in the right direction
** all ops already require that the lhs and rhs are of the same kind
(matrix vs vector) otherwise we'd have to do complex work
** multiplicative ops (introduced Kibeom's patch) are restricted to arrays, if only because for matrices they could be ambiguous.
* add a new test, vectorwiseop.cpp.
* these compound-assign operators used to be implemented with for loops:
for(Index j=0; j<subVectors(); ++j)
subVector(j).array() += other.derived().array();
This didn't seem to be needed; replaced by using expressions like operator+ and operator- did.
|
Gael Guennebaud
Benoit Jacob