// RUN: %dafny /compile:0 /print:"%t.print" /dprint:"%t.dprint" "%s" > "%t" // RUN: %diff "%s.expect" "%t" class C { var data: int; var n: nat; var st: set; ghost method CLemma(k: int) requires k != -23; ensures data < k; // magic, isn't it (or bogus, some would say) } // This method more or less just tests the syntax, resolution, and basic verification method ParallelStatement_Resolve( a: array, spine: set, Repr: set, S: set, clx: C, cly: C, clk: int ) requires a != null && null !in spine; modifies a, spine; { forall (i: int | 0 <= i < a.Length && i % 2 == 0) { a[i] := a[(i + 1) % a.Length] + 3; } forall (o | o in spine) { o.st := o.st + Repr; } forall (x, y | x in S && 0 <= y+x < 100) { Lemma(clx, x, y); // error: precondition does not hold (clx may be null) } forall (x, y | x in S && 0 <= y+x < 100) { cly.CLemma(x + y); // error: receiver might be null } forall (p | 0 <= p) ensures F(p) <= Sum(p) + p - 1; // error (no connection is known between F and Sum) { assert 0 <= G(p); ghost var t; if (p % 2 == 0) { assert G(p) == F(p+2); // error (there's nothing that gives any relation between F and G) t := p+p; } else { assume H(p, 20) < 100; // don't know how to justify this t := p; } PowerLemma(p, t); t := t + 1; PowerLemma(p, t); } } ghost method Lemma(c: C, x: int, y: int) requires c != null; ensures c.data <= x+y; ghost method PowerLemma(x: int, y: int) ensures Pred(x, y); function F(x: int): int function G(x: int): nat function H(x: int, y: int): int function Sum(x: int): int function Pred(x: int, y: int): bool // --------------------------------------------------------------------- method M0(S: set) requires null !in S; modifies S; ensures forall o :: o in S ==> o.data == 85; ensures forall o :: o != null && o !in S ==> o.data == old(o.data); { forall (s | s in S) { s.data := 85; } } method M1(S: set, x: C) requires null !in S && x in S; { forall (s | s in S) ensures s.data < 100; { assume s.data == 85; } if (*) { assert x.data == 85; // error (cannot be inferred from forall ensures clause) } else { assert x.data < 120; } forall (s | s in S) ensures s.data < 70; // error { assume s.data == 85; } } method M2() returns (a: array) ensures a != null; ensures forall i,j :: 0 <= i < a.Length/2 <= j < a.Length ==> a[i] < a[j]; { a := new int[250]; forall (i: nat | i < 125) { a[i] := 423; } forall (i | 125 <= i < 250) { a[i] := 300 + i; } } method M4(S: set, k: int) modifies S; { forall (s | s in S && s != null) { s.n := k; // error: k might be negative } } method M5() { if { case true => forall (x | 0 <= x < 100) { PowerLemma(x, x); } assert Pred(34, 34); case true => forall (x,y | 0 <= x < 100 && y == x+1) { PowerLemma(x, y); } assert Pred(34, 35); case true => forall (x,y | 0 <= x < y < 100) { PowerLemma(x, y); } assert Pred(34, 35); case true => forall (x | x in set k | 0 <= k < 100) { PowerLemma(x, x); } assert Pred(34, 34); } } method Main() { var a := new int[180]; forall (i | 0 <= i < 180) { a[i] := 2*i + 100; } var sq := [0, 0, 0, 2, 2, 2, 5, 5, 5]; forall (i | 0 <= i < |sq|) { a[20+i] := sq[i]; } forall (t | t in sq) { a[t] := 1000; } forall (t,u | t in sq && t < 4 && 10 <= u < 10+t) { a[u] := 6000 + t; } var k := 0; while (k < 180) { if (k != 0) { print ", "; } print a[k]; k := k + 1; } print "\n"; } method DuplicateUpdate() { var a := new int[180]; var sq := [0, 0, 0, 2, 2, 2, 5, 5, 5]; if (*) { forall (t,u | t in sq && 10 <= u < 10+t) { a[u] := 6000 + t; // error: a[10] (and a[11]) are assigned more than once } } else { forall (t,u | t in sq && t < 4 && 10 <= u < 10+t) { a[u] := 6000 + t; // with the 't < 4' conjunct in the line above, this is fine } } } ghost method DontDoMuch(x: int) { } method OmittedRange() { forall (x: int) { } // a type is still needed for the bound variable forall (x) { DontDoMuch(x); } } // ----------------------- two-state postconditions --------------------------------- class TwoState_C { ghost var data: int; } // It is not possible to achieve this postcondition in a ghost method, because ghost // contexts are not allowed to allocate state. Callers of this ghost method will know // that the postcondition is tantamount to 'false'. ghost method TwoState0(y: int) ensures exists o: TwoState_C :: o != null && fresh(o); method TwoState_Main0() { forall (x) { TwoState0(x); } assert false; // no prob, because the postcondition of TwoState0 implies false } method X_Legit(c: TwoState_C) requires c != null; modifies c; { c.data := c.data + 1; forall (x | c.data <= x) ensures old(c.data) < x; // note that the 'old' refers to the method's initial state { } } // At first glance, this looks like a version of TwoState_Main0 above, but with an // ensures clause. // However, there's an important difference in the translation, which is that the // occurrence of 'fresh' here refers to the initial state of the TwoStateMain2 // method, not the beginning of the 'forall' statement. method TwoState_Main2() { forall (x: int) ensures exists o: TwoState_C :: o != null && fresh(o); { TwoState0(x); } assert false; // fine, for the postcondition of the forall statement implies false } // At first glance, this looks like an inlined version of TwoState_Main0 above. // However, there's an important difference in the translation, which is that the // occurrence of 'fresh' here refers to the initial state of the TwoState_Main3 // method, not the beginning of the 'forall' statement. // Still, care needs to be taken in the translation to make sure that the forall // statement's effect on the heap is not optimized away. method TwoState_Main3() { forall (x: int) ensures exists o: TwoState_C :: o != null && fresh(o); { assume false; // (there's no other way to achieve this forall-statement postcondition) } assert false; // it is known that the forall's postcondition is contradictory, so this assert is fine } // ------- empty forall statement ----------------------------------------- class EmptyForallStatement { var emptyPar: int; method Empty_Parallel0() modifies this; ensures emptyPar == 8; { forall () { this.emptyPar := 8; } } function EmptyPar_P(x: int): bool ghost method EmptyPar_Lemma(x: int) ensures EmptyPar_P(x); method Empty_Parallel1() ensures EmptyPar_P(8); { forall { EmptyPar_Lemma(8); } } method Empty_Parallel2() { forall ensures exists k :: EmptyPar_P(k); { var y := 8; assume EmptyPar_P(y); } assert exists k :: EmptyPar_P(k); // yes assert EmptyPar_P(8); // error: the forall statement's ensures clause does not promise this } } // --------------------------------------------------------------------- // The following is an example that once didn't verify (because the forall statement that // induction inserts had caused the $Heap to be advanced, despite the fact that Th is a // ghost method). datatype Nat = Zero | Succ(tail: Nat) predicate ThProperty(step: nat, t: Nat, r: nat) { match t case Zero => true case Succ(o) => step>0 && exists ro:nat :: ThProperty(step-1, o, ro) } ghost method Th(step: nat, t: Nat, r: nat) requires t.Succ? && ThProperty(step, t, r); // the next line follows from the precondition and the definition of ThProperty ensures exists ro:nat :: ThProperty(step-1, t.tail, ro); { }