1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
|
(* -*- coding: utf-8 -*- *)
(************************************************************************)
(* v * The Coq Proof Assistant / The Coq Development Team *)
(* <O___,, * INRIA - CNRS - LIX - LRI - PPS - Copyright 1999-2010 *)
(* \VV/ **************************************************************)
(* // * This file is distributed under the terms of the *)
(* * GNU Lesser General Public License Version 2.1 *)
(************************************************************************)
(*i $Id: auxiliary.v 13323 2010-07-24 15:57:30Z herbelin $ i*)
(** Binary Integers (Pierre Crégut, CNET, Lannion, France) *)
Require Export Arith_base.
Require Import BinInt.
Require Import Zorder.
Require Import Decidable.
Require Import Peano_dec.
Require Export Compare_dec.
Open Local Scope Z_scope.
(***************************************************************)
(** * Moving terms from one side to the other of an inequality *)
Theorem Zne_left : forall n m:Z, Zne n m -> Zne (n + - m) 0.
Proof.
intros x y; unfold Zne in |- *; unfold not in |- *; intros H1 H2; apply H1;
apply Zplus_reg_l with (- y); rewrite Zplus_opp_l;
rewrite Zplus_comm; trivial with arith.
Qed.
Theorem Zegal_left : forall n m:Z, n = m -> n + - m = 0.
Proof.
intros x y H; apply (Zplus_reg_l y); rewrite Zplus_permute;
rewrite Zplus_opp_r; do 2 rewrite Zplus_0_r; assumption.
Qed.
Theorem Zle_left : forall n m:Z, n <= m -> 0 <= m + - n.
Proof.
intros x y H; replace 0 with (x + - x).
apply Zplus_le_compat_r; trivial.
apply Zplus_opp_r.
Qed.
Theorem Zle_left_rev : forall n m:Z, 0 <= m + - n -> n <= m.
Proof.
intros x y H; apply Zplus_le_reg_r with (- x).
rewrite Zplus_opp_r; trivial.
Qed.
Theorem Zlt_left_rev : forall n m:Z, 0 < m + - n -> n < m.
Proof.
intros x y H; apply Zplus_lt_reg_r with (- x).
rewrite Zplus_opp_r; trivial.
Qed.
Theorem Zlt_left : forall n m:Z, n < m -> 0 <= m + -1 + - n.
Proof.
intros x y H; apply Zle_left; apply Zsucc_le_reg;
change (Zsucc x <= Zsucc (Zpred y)) in |- *; rewrite <- Zsucc_pred;
apply Zlt_le_succ; assumption.
Qed.
Theorem Zlt_left_lt : forall n m:Z, n < m -> 0 < m + - n.
Proof.
intros x y H; replace 0 with (x + - x).
apply Zplus_lt_compat_r; trivial.
apply Zplus_opp_r.
Qed.
Theorem Zge_left : forall n m:Z, n >= m -> 0 <= n + - m.
Proof.
intros x y H; apply Zle_left; apply Zge_le; assumption.
Qed.
Theorem Zgt_left : forall n m:Z, n > m -> 0 <= n + -1 + - m.
Proof.
intros x y H; apply Zlt_left; apply Zgt_lt; assumption.
Qed.
Theorem Zgt_left_gt : forall n m:Z, n > m -> n + - m > 0.
Proof.
intros x y H; replace 0 with (y + - y).
apply Zplus_gt_compat_r; trivial.
apply Zplus_opp_r.
Qed.
Theorem Zgt_left_rev : forall n m:Z, n + - m > 0 -> n > m.
Proof.
intros x y H; apply Zplus_gt_reg_r with (- y).
rewrite Zplus_opp_r; trivial.
Qed.
Theorem Zle_mult_approx :
forall n m p:Z, n > 0 -> p > 0 -> 0 <= m -> 0 <= m * n + p.
Proof.
intros x y z H1 H2 H3; apply Zle_trans with (m := y * x);
[ apply Zmult_gt_0_le_0_compat; assumption
| pattern (y * x) at 1 in |- *; rewrite <- Zplus_0_r;
apply Zplus_le_compat_l; apply Zlt_le_weak; apply Zgt_lt;
assumption ].
Qed.
Theorem Zmult_le_approx :
forall n m p:Z, n > 0 -> n > p -> 0 <= m * n + p -> 0 <= m.
Proof.
intros x y z H1 H2 H3; apply Zlt_succ_le; apply Zmult_gt_0_lt_0_reg_r with x;
[ assumption
| apply Zle_lt_trans with (1 := H3); rewrite <- Zmult_succ_l_reverse;
apply Zplus_lt_compat_l; apply Zgt_lt; assumption ].
Qed.
|
