(************************************************************************) (* v * The Coq Proof Assistant / The Coq Development Team *) (* l:=i::!l) history; !l (** Basic manipulation of the command history stack *) exception Invalid let pop () = ignore (Stack.pop history) let npop n = (* Since our history stack always contains an initial entry, it's invalid to try to completely empty it *) if n < 0 || n >= Stack.length history then raise Invalid else for i = 1 to n do pop () done let top () = try Stack.top history with Stack.Empty -> raise Invalid (** Search the history stack for a suitable location. We perform first a non-destructive search: in case of search failure, the stack is unchanged. *) exception Found of info let search test = try Stack.iter (fun i -> if test i then raise (Found i)) history; raise Invalid with Found i -> while i != Stack.top history do pop () done (** An auxiliary function to retrieve the number of remaining subgoals *) let get_ngoals () = try let prf = Proof_global.give_me_the_proof () in List.length (Evd.sig_it (Proof.V82.background_subgoals prf)) with Proof_global.NoCurrentProof -> 0 (** Register the end of a command and store the current state *) let mark_command ast = Lib.add_frozen_state(); Lib.mark_end_of_command(); Stack.push { label = Lib.current_command_label (); nproofs = List.length (Pfedit.get_all_proof_names ()); prfname = (try Some (Pfedit.get_current_proof_name ()) with Proof_global.NoCurrentProof -> None); prfdepth = max 0 (Pfedit.current_proof_depth ()); reachable = true; ngoals = get_ngoals (); cmd = ast } history (** Backtrack by aborting [naborts] proofs, then setting proof-depth back to [pnum] and finally going to state number [snum]. *) let raw_backtrack snum pnum naborts = for i = 1 to naborts do Pfedit.delete_current_proof () done; Pfedit.undo_todepth pnum; Lib.reset_label snum (** Re-sync the state of the system (label, proofs) with the top of the history stack. We may end on some earlier state to avoid re-opening proofs. This function will return the final label and the number of extra backtracking steps performed. *) let sync nb_opened_proofs = (* Backtrack by enough additional steps to avoid re-opening proofs. Typically, when a Qed has been crossed, we backtrack to the proof start. NB: We cannot reach the empty stack, since the first entry in the stack has no opened proofs and is tagged as reachable. *) let extra = ref 0 in while not (top()).reachable do incr extra; pop () done; let target = top () in (* Now the opened proofs at target is a subset of the opened proofs before the backtrack, we simply abort the extra proofs (if any). NB: It is critical here that proofs are nested in a regular way (i.e. no more Resume or Suspend commands as earlier). This way, we can simply count the extra proofs to abort instead of taking care of their names. *) let naborts = nb_opened_proofs - target.nproofs in (* We are now ready to do a low-level backtrack *) raw_backtrack target.label target.prfdepth naborts; (target.label, !extra) (** Backtracking by a certain number of (non-state-preserving) commands. This is used by Coqide. It may actually undo more commands than asked : for instance instead of jumping back in the middle of a finished proof, we jump back before this proof. The number of extra backtracked command is returned at the end. *) let back count = if count = 0 then 0 else let nb_opened_proofs = List.length (Pfedit.get_all_proof_names ()) in npop count; snd (sync nb_opened_proofs) (** Backtracking to a certain state number, and reset proofs accordingly. We may end on some earlier state if needed to avoid re-opening proofs. Return the final state number. *) let backto snum = if snum = Lib.current_command_label () then snum else let nb_opened_proofs = List.length (Pfedit.get_all_proof_names ()) in search (fun i -> i.label = snum); fst (sync nb_opened_proofs) (** Old [Backtrack] code with corresponding update of the history stack. [Backtrack] is now deprecated (in favor of [BackTo]) but is kept for compatibility with ProofGeneral. It's completely up to ProofGeneral to decide where to go and how to adapt proofs. Note that the choices of ProofGeneral are currently not always perfect (for instance when backtracking an Undo). *) let backtrack snum pnum naborts = raw_backtrack snum pnum naborts; search (fun i -> i.label = snum) (** [reset_initial] resets the system and clears the command history stack, only pushing back the initial entry. It should be equivalent to [backto Lib.first_command_label], but sligthly more efficient. *) let reset_initial () = let init_label = Lib.first_command_label in if Lib.current_command_label () = init_label then () else begin Pfedit.delete_all_proofs (); Lib.reset_label init_label; Stack.clear history; Stack.push { label = init_label; nproofs = 0; prfname = None; prfdepth = 0; ngoals = 0; reachable = true; cmd = VernacNop } history end (** Reset to the last known state just before defining [id] *) let reset_name id = let lbl = try Lib.label_before_name id with Not_found -> raise Invalid in ignore (backto lbl) (** When a proof is ended (via either Qed/Admitted/Restart/Abort), old proof steps should be marked differently to avoid jumping back to them: - either this proof isn't there anymore in the proof engine - either it's there but it's a more recent attempt after a Restart, so we shouldn't mix the two. We also mark as unreachable the proof steps cancelled via a Undo. *) let mark_unreachable ?(after=0) prf_lst = let fix i = match i.prfname with | None -> raise Not_found (* stop hacking the history outside of proofs *) | Some p -> if List.mem p prf_lst && i.prfdepth > after then i.reachable <- false in try Stack.iter fix history with Not_found -> () (** Parse the history stack for printing the script of a proof *) let get_script prf = let script = ref [] in let select i = match i.prfname with | None -> raise Not_found | Some p when p=prf && i.reachable -> script := i :: !script | _ -> () in (try Stack.iter select history with Not_found -> ()); (* Get rid of intermediate commands which don't grow the proof depth *) let rec filter n = function | [] -> [] | {prfdepth=d; cmd=c; ngoals=ng}::l when n < d -> (c,ng) :: filter d l | {prfdepth=d}::l -> filter d l in (* initial proof depth (after entering the lemma statement) is 1 *) filter 1 !script