(************************************************************************) (* v * The Coq Proof Assistant / The Coq Development Team *) (* Z | Zneg : positive -> Z. (** Declare Scope Z_scope with Key Z *) Delimit Scope Z_scope with Z. (** Automatically open scope positive_scope for the constructors of Z *) Bind Scope Z_scope with Z. Arguments Scope Zpos [positive_scope]. Arguments Scope Zneg [positive_scope]. (** Subtraction of positive into Z *) Definition Zdouble_plus_one (x:Z) := match x with | Z0 => Zpos 1 | Zpos p => Zpos (xI p) | Zneg p => Zneg (Pdouble_minus_one p) end. Definition Zdouble_minus_one (x:Z) := match x with | Z0 => Zneg 1 | Zneg p => Zneg (xI p) | Zpos p => Zpos (Pdouble_minus_one p) end. Definition Zdouble (x:Z) := match x with | Z0 => Z0 | Zpos p => Zpos (xO p) | Zneg p => Zneg (xO p) end. Fixpoint ZPminus (x y:positive) {struct y} : Z := match x, y with | xI x', xI y' => Zdouble (ZPminus x' y') | xI x', xO y' => Zdouble_plus_one (ZPminus x' y') | xI x', xH => Zpos (xO x') | xO x', xI y' => Zdouble_minus_one (ZPminus x' y') | xO x', xO y' => Zdouble (ZPminus x' y') | xO x', xH => Zpos (Pdouble_minus_one x') | xH, xI y' => Zneg (xO y') | xH, xO y' => Zneg (Pdouble_minus_one y') | xH, xH => Z0 end. (** Addition on integers *) Definition Zplus (x y:Z) := match x, y with | Z0, y => y | x, Z0 => x | Zpos x', Zpos y' => Zpos (x' + y') | Zpos x', Zneg y' => match (x' ?= y')%positive Eq with | Eq => Z0 | Lt => Zneg (y' - x') | Gt => Zpos (x' - y') end | Zneg x', Zpos y' => match (x' ?= y')%positive Eq with | Eq => Z0 | Lt => Zpos (y' - x') | Gt => Zneg (x' - y') end | Zneg x', Zneg y' => Zneg (x' + y') end. Infix "+" := Zplus : Z_scope. (** Opposite *) Definition Zopp (x:Z) := match x with | Z0 => Z0 | Zpos x => Zneg x | Zneg x => Zpos x end. Notation "- x" := (Zopp x) : Z_scope. (** Successor on integers *) Definition Zsucc (x:Z) := (x + Zpos 1)%Z. (** Predecessor on integers *) Definition Zpred (x:Z) := (x + Zneg 1)%Z. (** Subtraction on integers *) Definition Zminus (m n:Z) := (m + - n)%Z. Infix "-" := Zminus : Z_scope. (** Multiplication on integers *) Definition Zmult (x y:Z) := match x, y with | Z0, _ => Z0 | _, Z0 => Z0 | Zpos x', Zpos y' => Zpos (x' * y') | Zpos x', Zneg y' => Zneg (x' * y') | Zneg x', Zpos y' => Zneg (x' * y') | Zneg x', Zneg y' => Zpos (x' * y') end. Infix "*" := Zmult : Z_scope. (** Comparison of integers *) Definition Zcompare (x y:Z) := match x, y with | Z0, Z0 => Eq | Z0, Zpos y' => Lt | Z0, Zneg y' => Gt | Zpos x', Z0 => Gt | Zpos x', Zpos y' => (x' ?= y')%positive Eq | Zpos x', Zneg y' => Gt | Zneg x', Z0 => Lt | Zneg x', Zpos y' => Lt | Zneg x', Zneg y' => CompOpp ((x' ?= y')%positive Eq) end. Infix "?=" := Zcompare (at level 70, no associativity) : Z_scope. Ltac elim_compare com1 com2 := case (Dcompare (com1 ?= com2)%Z); [ idtac | let x := fresh "H" in (intro x; case x; clear x) ]. (** Sign function *) Definition Zsgn (z:Z) : Z := match z with | Z0 => Z0 | Zpos p => Zpos 1 | Zneg p => Zneg 1 end. (** Direct, easier to handle variants of successor and addition *) Definition Zsucc' (x:Z) := match x with | Z0 => Zpos 1 | Zpos x' => Zpos (Psucc x') | Zneg x' => ZPminus 1 x' end. Definition Zpred' (x:Z) := match x with | Z0 => Zneg 1 | Zpos x' => ZPminus x' 1 | Zneg x' => Zneg (Psucc x') end. Definition Zplus' (x y:Z) := match x, y with | Z0, y => y | x, Z0 => x | Zpos x', Zpos y' => Zpos (x' + y') | Zpos x', Zneg y' => ZPminus x' y' | Zneg x', Zpos y' => ZPminus y' x' | Zneg x', Zneg y' => Zneg (x' + y') end. Open Local Scope Z_scope. (**********************************************************************) (** Inductive specification of Z *) Theorem Zind : forall P:Z -> Prop, P Z0 -> (forall x:Z, P x -> P (Zsucc' x)) -> (forall x:Z, P x -> P (Zpred' x)) -> forall n:Z, P n. Proof. intros P H0 Hs Hp z; destruct z. assumption. apply Pind with (P := fun p => P (Zpos p)). change (P (Zsucc' Z0)) in |- *; apply Hs; apply H0. intro n; exact (Hs (Zpos n)). apply Pind with (P := fun p => P (Zneg p)). change (P (Zpred' Z0)) in |- *; apply Hp; apply H0. intro n; exact (Hp (Zneg n)). Qed. (**********************************************************************) (** Properties of opposite on binary integer numbers *) Theorem Zopp_neg : forall p:positive, - Zneg p = Zpos p. Proof. reflexivity. Qed. (** [opp] is involutive *) Theorem Zopp_involutive : forall n:Z, - - n = n. Proof. intro x; destruct x; reflexivity. Qed. (** Injectivity of the opposite *) Theorem Zopp_inj : forall n m:Z, - n = - m -> n = m. Proof. intros x y; case x; case y; simpl in |- *; intros; [ trivial | discriminate H | discriminate H | discriminate H | simplify_eq H; intro E; rewrite E; trivial | discriminate H | discriminate H | discriminate H | simplify_eq H; intro E; rewrite E; trivial ]. Qed. (**********************************************************************) (* Properties of the direct definition of successor and predecessor *) Lemma Zpred'_succ' : forall n:Z, Zpred' (Zsucc' n) = n. Proof. intro x; destruct x; simpl in |- *. reflexivity. destruct p; simpl in |- *; try rewrite Pdouble_minus_one_o_succ_eq_xI; reflexivity. destruct p; simpl in |- *; try rewrite Psucc_o_double_minus_one_eq_xO; reflexivity. Qed. Lemma Zsucc'_discr : forall n:Z, n <> Zsucc' n. Proof. intro x; destruct x; simpl in |- *. discriminate. injection; apply Psucc_discr. destruct p; simpl in |- *. discriminate. intro H; symmetry in H; injection H; apply double_moins_un_xO_discr. discriminate. Qed. (**********************************************************************) (** Other properties of binary integer numbers *) Lemma ZL0 : 2%nat = (1 + 1)%nat. Proof. reflexivity. Qed. (**********************************************************************) (** Properties of the addition on integers *) (** zero is left neutral for addition *) Theorem Zplus_0_l : forall n:Z, Z0 + n = n. Proof. intro x; destruct x; reflexivity. Qed. (** zero is right neutral for addition *) Theorem Zplus_0_r : forall n:Z, n + Z0 = n. Proof. intro x; destruct x; reflexivity. Qed. (** addition is commutative *) Theorem Zplus_comm : forall n m:Z, n + m = m + n. Proof. intro x; induction x as [| p| p]; intro y; destruct y as [| q| q]; simpl in |- *; try reflexivity. rewrite Pplus_comm; reflexivity. rewrite ZC4; destruct ((q ?= p)%positive Eq); reflexivity. rewrite ZC4; destruct ((q ?= p)%positive Eq); reflexivity. rewrite Pplus_comm; reflexivity. Qed. (** opposite distributes over addition *) Theorem Zopp_plus_distr : forall n m:Z, - (n + m) = - n + - m. Proof. intro x; destruct x as [| p| p]; intro y; destruct y as [| q| q]; simpl in |- *; reflexivity || destruct ((p ?= q)%positive Eq); reflexivity. Qed. (** opposite is inverse for addition *) Theorem Zplus_opp_r : forall n:Z, n + - n = Z0. Proof. intro x; destruct x as [| p| p]; simpl in |- *; [ reflexivity | rewrite (Pcompare_refl p); reflexivity | rewrite (Pcompare_refl p); reflexivity ]. Qed. Theorem Zplus_opp_l : forall n:Z, - n + n = Z0. Proof. intro; rewrite Zplus_comm; apply Zplus_opp_r. Qed. Hint Local Resolve Zplus_0_l Zplus_0_r. (** addition is associative *) Lemma weak_assoc : forall (p q:positive) (n:Z), Zpos p + (Zpos q + n) = Zpos p + Zpos q + n. Proof. intros x y z'; case z'; [ auto with arith | intros z; simpl in |- *; rewrite Pplus_assoc; auto with arith | intros z; simpl in |- *; ElimPcompare y z; intros E0; rewrite E0; ElimPcompare (x + y)%positive z; intros E1; rewrite E1; [ absurd ((x + y ?= z)%positive Eq = Eq); [ (* Case 1 *) rewrite nat_of_P_gt_Gt_compare_complement_morphism; [ discriminate | rewrite nat_of_P_plus_morphism; rewrite (Pcompare_Eq_eq y z E0); elim (ZL4 x); intros k E2; rewrite E2; simpl in |- *; unfold gt, lt in |- *; apply le_n_S; apply le_plus_r ] | assumption ] | absurd ((x + y ?= z)%positive Eq = Lt); [ (* Case 2 *) rewrite nat_of_P_gt_Gt_compare_complement_morphism; [ discriminate | rewrite nat_of_P_plus_morphism; rewrite (Pcompare_Eq_eq y z E0); elim (ZL4 x); intros k E2; rewrite E2; simpl in |- *; unfold gt, lt in |- *; apply le_n_S; apply le_plus_r ] | assumption ] | rewrite (Pcompare_Eq_eq y z E0); (* Case 3 *) elim (Pminus_mask_Gt (x + z) z); [ intros t H; elim H; intros H1 H2; elim H2; intros H3 H4; unfold Pminus in |- *; rewrite H1; cut (x = t); [ intros E; rewrite E; auto with arith | apply Pplus_reg_r with (r := z); rewrite <- H3; rewrite Pplus_comm; trivial with arith ] | pattern z at 1 in |- *; rewrite <- (Pcompare_Eq_eq y z E0); assumption ] | elim (Pminus_mask_Gt z y); [ (* Case 4 *) intros k H; elim H; intros H1 H2; elim H2; intros H3 H4; unfold Pminus at 1 in |- *; rewrite H1; cut (x = k); [ intros E; rewrite E; rewrite (Pcompare_refl k); trivial with arith | apply Pplus_reg_r with (r := y); rewrite (Pplus_comm k y); rewrite H3; apply Pcompare_Eq_eq; assumption ] | apply ZC2; assumption ] | elim (Pminus_mask_Gt z y); [ (* Case 5 *) intros k H; elim H; intros H1 H2; elim H2; intros H3 H4; unfold Pminus at 1 3 5 in |- *; rewrite H1; cut ((x ?= k)%positive Eq = Lt); [ intros E2; rewrite E2; elim (Pminus_mask_Gt k x); [ intros i H5; elim H5; intros H6 H7; elim H7; intros H8 H9; elim (Pminus_mask_Gt z (x + y)); [ intros j H10; elim H10; intros H11 H12; elim H12; intros H13 H14; unfold Pminus in |- *; rewrite H6; rewrite H11; cut (i = j); [ intros E; rewrite E; auto with arith | apply (Pplus_reg_l (x + y)); rewrite H13; rewrite (Pplus_comm x y); rewrite <- Pplus_assoc; rewrite H8; assumption ] | apply ZC2; assumption ] | apply ZC2; assumption ] | apply nat_of_P_lt_Lt_compare_complement_morphism; apply plus_lt_reg_l with (p := nat_of_P y); do 2 rewrite <- nat_of_P_plus_morphism; apply nat_of_P_lt_Lt_compare_morphism; rewrite H3; rewrite Pplus_comm; assumption ] | apply ZC2; assumption ] | elim (Pminus_mask_Gt z y); [ (* Case 6 *) intros k H; elim H; intros H1 H2; elim H2; intros H3 H4; elim (Pminus_mask_Gt (x + y) z); [ intros i H5; elim H5; intros H6 H7; elim H7; intros H8 H9; unfold Pminus in |- *; rewrite H1; rewrite H6; cut ((x ?= k)%positive Eq = Gt); [ intros H10; elim (Pminus_mask_Gt x k H10); intros j H11; elim H11; intros H12 H13; elim H13; intros H14 H15; rewrite H10; rewrite H12; cut (i = j); [ intros H16; rewrite H16; auto with arith | apply (Pplus_reg_l (z + k)); rewrite <- (Pplus_assoc z k j); rewrite H14; rewrite (Pplus_comm z k); rewrite <- Pplus_assoc; rewrite H8; rewrite (Pplus_comm x y); rewrite Pplus_assoc; rewrite (Pplus_comm k y); rewrite H3; trivial with arith ] | apply nat_of_P_gt_Gt_compare_complement_morphism; unfold lt, gt in |- *; apply plus_lt_reg_l with (p := nat_of_P y); do 2 rewrite <- nat_of_P_plus_morphism; apply nat_of_P_lt_Lt_compare_morphism; rewrite H3; rewrite Pplus_comm; apply ZC1; assumption ] | assumption ] | apply ZC2; assumption ] | absurd ((x + y ?= z)%positive Eq = Eq); [ (* Case 7 *) rewrite nat_of_P_gt_Gt_compare_complement_morphism; [ discriminate | rewrite nat_of_P_plus_morphism; unfold gt in |- *; apply lt_le_trans with (m := nat_of_P y); [ apply nat_of_P_lt_Lt_compare_morphism; apply ZC1; assumption | apply le_plus_r ] ] | assumption ] | absurd ((x + y ?= z)%positive Eq = Lt); [ (* Case 8 *) rewrite nat_of_P_gt_Gt_compare_complement_morphism; [ discriminate | unfold gt in |- *; apply lt_le_trans with (m := nat_of_P y); [ exact (nat_of_P_gt_Gt_compare_morphism y z E0) | rewrite nat_of_P_plus_morphism; apply le_plus_r ] ] | assumption ] | elim Pminus_mask_Gt with (1 := E0); intros k H1; (* Case 9 *) elim Pminus_mask_Gt with (1 := E1); intros i H2; elim H1; intros H3 H4; elim H4; intros H5 H6; elim H2; intros H7 H8; elim H8; intros H9 H10; unfold Pminus in |- *; rewrite H3; rewrite H7; cut ((x + k)%positive = i); [ intros E; rewrite E; auto with arith | apply (Pplus_reg_l z); rewrite (Pplus_comm x k); rewrite Pplus_assoc; rewrite H5; rewrite H9; rewrite Pplus_comm; trivial with arith ] ] ]. Qed. Hint Local Resolve weak_assoc. Theorem Zplus_assoc : forall n m p:Z, n + (m + p) = n + m + p. Proof. intros x y z; case x; case y; case z; auto with arith; intros; [ rewrite (Zplus_comm (Zneg p0)); rewrite weak_assoc; rewrite (Zplus_comm (Zpos p1 + Zneg p0)); rewrite weak_assoc; rewrite (Zplus_comm (Zpos p1)); trivial with arith | apply Zopp_inj; do 4 rewrite Zopp_plus_distr; do 2 rewrite Zopp_neg; rewrite Zplus_comm; rewrite <- weak_assoc; rewrite (Zplus_comm (- Zpos p1)); rewrite (Zplus_comm (Zpos p0 + - Zpos p1)); rewrite (weak_assoc p); rewrite weak_assoc; rewrite (Zplus_comm (Zpos p0)); trivial with arith | rewrite Zplus_comm; rewrite (Zplus_comm (Zpos p0) (Zpos p)); rewrite <- weak_assoc; rewrite Zplus_comm; rewrite (Zplus_comm (Zpos p0)); trivial with arith | apply Zopp_inj; do 4 rewrite Zopp_plus_distr; do 2 rewrite Zopp_neg; rewrite (Zplus_comm (- Zpos p0)); rewrite weak_assoc; rewrite (Zplus_comm (Zpos p1 + - Zpos p0)); rewrite weak_assoc; rewrite (Zplus_comm (Zpos p)); trivial with arith | apply Zopp_inj; do 4 rewrite Zopp_plus_distr; do 2 rewrite Zopp_neg; apply weak_assoc | apply Zopp_inj; do 4 rewrite Zopp_plus_distr; do 2 rewrite Zopp_neg; apply weak_assoc ]. Qed. Lemma Zplus_assoc_reverse : forall n m p:Z, n + m + p = n + (m + p). Proof. intros; symmetry in |- *; apply Zplus_assoc. Qed. (** Associativity mixed with commutativity *) Theorem Zplus_permute : forall n m p:Z, n + (m + p) = m + (n + p). Proof. intros n m p; rewrite Zplus_comm; rewrite <- Zplus_assoc; rewrite (Zplus_comm p n); trivial with arith. Qed. (** addition simplifies *) Theorem Zplus_reg_l : forall n m p:Z, n + m = n + p -> m = p. intros n m p H; cut (- n + (n + m) = - n + (n + p)); [ do 2 rewrite Zplus_assoc; rewrite (Zplus_comm (- n) n); rewrite Zplus_opp_r; simpl in |- *; trivial with arith | rewrite H; trivial with arith ]. Qed. (** addition and successor permutes *) Lemma Zplus_succ_l : forall n m:Z, Zsucc n + m = Zsucc (n + m). Proof. intros x y; unfold Zsucc in |- *; rewrite (Zplus_comm (x + y)); rewrite Zplus_assoc; rewrite (Zplus_comm (Zpos 1)); trivial with arith. Qed. Lemma Zplus_succ_r : forall n m:Z, Zsucc (n + m) = n + Zsucc m. Proof. intros n m; unfold Zsucc in |- *; rewrite Zplus_assoc; trivial with arith. Qed. Lemma Zplus_succ_comm : forall n m:Z, Zsucc n + m = n + Zsucc m. Proof. unfold Zsucc in |- *; intros n m; rewrite <- Zplus_assoc; rewrite (Zplus_comm (Zpos 1)); trivial with arith. Qed. (** Misc properties, usually redundant or non natural *) Lemma Zplus_0_r_reverse : forall n:Z, n = n + Z0. Proof. symmetry in |- *; apply Zplus_0_r. Qed. Lemma Zplus_0_simpl_l : forall n m:Z, n + Z0 = m -> n = m. Proof. intros n m; rewrite Zplus_0_r; intro; assumption. Qed. Lemma Zplus_0_simpl_l_reverse : forall n m:Z, n = m + Z0 -> n = m. Proof. intros n m; rewrite Zplus_0_r; intro; assumption. Qed. Lemma Zplus_eq_compat : forall n m p q:Z, n = m -> p = q -> n + p = m + q. Proof. intros; rewrite H; rewrite H0; reflexivity. Qed. Lemma Zplus_opp_expand : forall n m p:Z, n + - m = n + - p + (p + - m). Proof. intros x y z. rewrite <- (Zplus_assoc x). rewrite (Zplus_assoc (- z)). rewrite Zplus_opp_l. reflexivity. Qed. (**********************************************************************) (** Properties of successor and predecessor on binary integer numbers *) Theorem Zsucc_discr : forall n:Z, n <> Zsucc n. Proof. intros n; cut (Z0 <> Zpos 1); [ unfold not in |- *; intros H1 H2; apply H1; apply (Zplus_reg_l n); rewrite Zplus_0_r; exact H2 | discriminate ]. Qed. Theorem Zpos_succ_morphism : forall p:positive, Zpos (Psucc p) = Zsucc (Zpos p). Proof. intro; rewrite Pplus_one_succ_r; unfold Zsucc in |- *; simpl in |- *; trivial with arith. Qed. (** successor and predecessor are inverse functions *) Theorem Zsucc_pred : forall n:Z, n = Zsucc (Zpred n). Proof. intros n; unfold Zsucc, Zpred in |- *; rewrite <- Zplus_assoc; simpl in |- *; rewrite Zplus_0_r; trivial with arith. Qed. Hint Immediate Zsucc_pred: zarith. Theorem Zpred_succ : forall n:Z, n = Zpred (Zsucc n). Proof. intros m; unfold Zpred, Zsucc in |- *; rewrite <- Zplus_assoc; simpl in |- *; rewrite Zplus_comm; auto with arith. Qed. Theorem Zsucc_inj : forall n m:Z, Zsucc n = Zsucc m -> n = m. Proof. intros n m H. change (Zneg 1 + Zpos 1 + n = Zneg 1 + Zpos 1 + m) in |- *; do 2 rewrite <- Zplus_assoc; do 2 rewrite (Zplus_comm (Zpos 1)); unfold Zsucc in H; rewrite H; trivial with arith. Qed. (** Misc properties, usually redundant or non natural *) Lemma Zsucc_eq_compat : forall n m:Z, n = m -> Zsucc n = Zsucc m. Proof. intros n m H; rewrite H; reflexivity. Qed. Lemma Zsucc_inj_contrapositive : forall n m:Z, n <> m -> Zsucc n <> Zsucc m. Proof. unfold not in |- *; intros n m H1 H2; apply H1; apply Zsucc_inj; assumption. Qed. (**********************************************************************) (** Properties of subtraction on binary integer numbers *) Lemma Zminus_0_r : forall n:Z, n - Z0 = n. Proof. intro; unfold Zminus in |- *; simpl in |- *; rewrite Zplus_0_r; trivial with arith. Qed. Lemma Zminus_0_l_reverse : forall n:Z, n = n - Z0. Proof. intro; symmetry in |- *; apply Zminus_0_r. Qed. Lemma Zminus_diag : forall n:Z, n - n = Z0. Proof. intro; unfold Zminus in |- *; rewrite Zplus_opp_r; trivial with arith. Qed. Lemma Zminus_diag_reverse : forall n:Z, Z0 = n - n. Proof. intro; symmetry in |- *; apply Zminus_diag. Qed. Lemma Zplus_minus_eq : forall n m p:Z, n = m + p -> p = n - m. Proof. intros n m p H; unfold Zminus in |- *; apply (Zplus_reg_l m); rewrite (Zplus_comm m (n + - m)); rewrite <- Zplus_assoc; rewrite Zplus_opp_l; rewrite Zplus_0_r; rewrite H; trivial with arith. Qed. Lemma Zminus_plus : forall n m:Z, n + m - n = m. Proof. intros n m; unfold Zminus in |- *; rewrite (Zplus_comm n m); rewrite <- Zplus_assoc; rewrite Zplus_opp_r; apply Zplus_0_r. Qed. Lemma Zplus_minus : forall n m:Z, n + (m - n) = m. Proof. unfold Zminus in |- *; intros n m; rewrite Zplus_permute; rewrite Zplus_opp_r; apply Zplus_0_r. Qed. Lemma Zminus_succ_l : forall n m:Z, Zsucc (n - m) = Zsucc n - m. Proof. intros n m; unfold Zminus, Zsucc in |- *; rewrite (Zplus_comm n (- m)); rewrite <- Zplus_assoc; apply Zplus_comm. Qed. Lemma Zminus_plus_simpl_l : forall n m p:Z, p + n - (p + m) = n - m. Proof. intros n m p; unfold Zminus in |- *; rewrite Zopp_plus_distr; rewrite Zplus_assoc; rewrite (Zplus_comm p); rewrite <- (Zplus_assoc n p); rewrite Zplus_opp_r; rewrite Zplus_0_r; trivial with arith. Qed. Lemma Zminus_plus_simpl_l_reverse : forall n m p:Z, n - m = p + n - (p + m). Proof. intros; symmetry in |- *; apply Zminus_plus_simpl_l. Qed. Lemma Zminus_plus_simpl_r : forall n m p:Z, n + p - (m + p) = n - m. intros x y n. unfold Zminus in |- *. rewrite Zopp_plus_distr. rewrite (Zplus_comm (- y) (- n)). rewrite Zplus_assoc. rewrite <- (Zplus_assoc x n (- n)). rewrite (Zplus_opp_r n). rewrite <- Zplus_0_r_reverse. reflexivity. Qed. (** Misc redundant properties *) Lemma Zeq_minus : forall n m:Z, n = m -> n - m = Z0. Proof. intros x y H; rewrite H; symmetry in |- *; apply Zminus_diag_reverse. Qed. Lemma Zminus_eq : forall n m:Z, n - m = Z0 -> n = m. Proof. intros x y H; rewrite <- (Zplus_minus y x); rewrite H; apply Zplus_0_r. Qed. (**********************************************************************) (** Properties of multiplication on binary integer numbers *) Theorem Zpos_mult_morphism : forall p q:positive, Zpos (p*q) = Zpos p * Zpos q. Proof. auto. Qed. (** One is neutral for multiplication *) Theorem Zmult_1_l : forall n:Z, Zpos 1 * n = n. Proof. intro x; destruct x; reflexivity. Qed. Theorem Zmult_1_r : forall n:Z, n * Zpos 1 = n. Proof. intro x; destruct x; simpl in |- *; try rewrite Pmult_1_r; reflexivity. Qed. (** Zero property of multiplication *) Theorem Zmult_0_l : forall n:Z, Z0 * n = Z0. Proof. intro x; destruct x; reflexivity. Qed. Theorem Zmult_0_r : forall n:Z, n * Z0 = Z0. Proof. intro x; destruct x; reflexivity. Qed. Hint Local Resolve Zmult_0_l Zmult_0_r. Lemma Zmult_0_r_reverse : forall n:Z, Z0 = n * Z0. Proof. intro x; destruct x; reflexivity. Qed. (** Commutativity of multiplication *) Theorem Zmult_comm : forall n m:Z, n * m = m * n. Proof. intros x y; destruct x as [| p| p]; destruct y as [| q| q]; simpl in |- *; try rewrite (Pmult_comm p q); reflexivity. Qed. (** Associativity of multiplication *) Theorem Zmult_assoc : forall n m p:Z, n * (m * p) = n * m * p. Proof. intros x y z; destruct x; destruct y; destruct z; simpl in |- *; try rewrite Pmult_assoc; reflexivity. Qed. Lemma Zmult_assoc_reverse : forall n m p:Z, n * m * p = n * (m * p). Proof. intros n m p; rewrite Zmult_assoc; trivial with arith. Qed. (** Associativity mixed with commutativity *) Theorem Zmult_permute : forall n m p:Z, n * (m * p) = m * (n * p). Proof. intros x y z; rewrite (Zmult_assoc y x z); rewrite (Zmult_comm y x). apply Zmult_assoc. Qed. (** Z is integral *) Theorem Zmult_integral_l : forall n m:Z, n <> Z0 -> m * n = Z0 -> m = Z0. Proof. intros x y; destruct x as [| p| p]. intro H; absurd (Z0 = Z0); trivial. intros _ H; destruct y as [| q| q]; reflexivity || discriminate. intros _ H; destruct y as [| q| q]; reflexivity || discriminate. Qed. Theorem Zmult_integral : forall n m:Z, n * m = Z0 -> n = Z0 \/ m = Z0. Proof. intros x y; destruct x; destruct y; auto; simpl in |- *; intro H; discriminate H. Qed. Lemma Zmult_1_inversion_l : forall n m:Z, n * m = Zpos 1 -> n = Zpos 1 \/ n = Zneg 1. Proof. intros x y; destruct x as [| p| p]; intro; [ discriminate | left | right ]; (destruct y as [| q| q]; try discriminate; simpl in H; injection H; clear H; intro H; rewrite Pmult_1_inversion_l with (1 := H); reflexivity). Qed. (** Multiplication and Opposite *) Theorem Zopp_mult_distr_l : forall n m:Z, - (n * m) = - n * m. Proof. intros x y; destruct x; destruct y; reflexivity. Qed. Theorem Zopp_mult_distr_r : forall n m:Z, - (n * m) = n * - m. intros x y; rewrite (Zmult_comm x y); rewrite Zopp_mult_distr_l; apply Zmult_comm. Qed. Lemma Zopp_mult_distr_l_reverse : forall n m:Z, - n * m = - (n * m). Proof. intros x y; symmetry in |- *; apply Zopp_mult_distr_l. Qed. Theorem Zmult_opp_comm : forall n m:Z, - n * m = n * - m. intros x y; rewrite Zopp_mult_distr_l_reverse; rewrite Zopp_mult_distr_r; trivial with arith. Qed. Theorem Zmult_opp_opp : forall n m:Z, - n * - m = n * m. Proof. intros x y; destruct x; destruct y; reflexivity. Qed. Theorem Zopp_eq_mult_neg_1 : forall n:Z, - n = n * Zneg 1. intro x; induction x; intros; rewrite Zmult_comm; auto with arith. Qed. (** Distributivity of multiplication over addition *) Lemma weak_Zmult_plus_distr_r : forall (p:positive) (n m:Z), Zpos p * (n + m) = Zpos p * n + Zpos p * m. Proof. intros x y' z'; case y'; case z'; auto with arith; intros y z; (simpl in |- *; rewrite Pmult_plus_distr_l; trivial with arith) || (simpl in |- *; ElimPcompare z y; intros E0; rewrite E0; [ rewrite (Pcompare_Eq_eq z y E0); rewrite (Pcompare_refl (x * y)); trivial with arith | cut ((x * z ?= x * y)%positive Eq = Lt); [ intros E; rewrite E; rewrite Pmult_minus_distr_l; [ trivial with arith | apply ZC2; assumption ] | apply nat_of_P_lt_Lt_compare_complement_morphism; do 2 rewrite nat_of_P_mult_morphism; elim (ZL4 x); intros h H1; rewrite H1; apply mult_S_lt_compat_l; exact (nat_of_P_lt_Lt_compare_morphism z y E0) ] | cut ((x * z ?= x * y)%positive Eq = Gt); [ intros E; rewrite E; rewrite Pmult_minus_distr_l; auto with arith | apply nat_of_P_gt_Gt_compare_complement_morphism; unfold gt in |- *; do 2 rewrite nat_of_P_mult_morphism; elim (ZL4 x); intros h H1; rewrite H1; apply mult_S_lt_compat_l; exact (nat_of_P_gt_Gt_compare_morphism z y E0) ] ]). Qed. Theorem Zmult_plus_distr_r : forall n m p:Z, n * (m + p) = n * m + n * p. Proof. intros x y z; case x; [ auto with arith | intros x'; apply weak_Zmult_plus_distr_r | intros p; apply Zopp_inj; rewrite Zopp_plus_distr; do 3 rewrite <- Zopp_mult_distr_l_reverse; rewrite Zopp_neg; apply weak_Zmult_plus_distr_r ]. Qed. Theorem Zmult_plus_distr_l : forall n m p:Z, (n + m) * p = n * p + m * p. Proof. intros n m p; rewrite Zmult_comm; rewrite Zmult_plus_distr_r; do 2 rewrite (Zmult_comm p); trivial with arith. Qed. (** Distributivity of multiplication over subtraction *) Lemma Zmult_minus_distr_r : forall n m p:Z, (n - m) * p = n * p - m * p. Proof. intros x y z; unfold Zminus in |- *. rewrite <- Zopp_mult_distr_l_reverse. apply Zmult_plus_distr_l. Qed. Lemma Zmult_minus_distr_l : forall n m p:Z, p * (n - m) = p * n - p * m. Proof. intros x y z; rewrite (Zmult_comm z (x - y)). rewrite (Zmult_comm z x). rewrite (Zmult_comm z y). apply Zmult_minus_distr_r. Qed. (** Simplification of multiplication for non-zero integers *) Lemma Zmult_reg_l : forall n m p:Z, p <> Z0 -> p * n = p * m -> n = m. Proof. intros x y z H H0. generalize (Zeq_minus _ _ H0). intro. apply Zminus_eq. rewrite <- Zmult_minus_distr_l in H1. clear H0; destruct (Zmult_integral _ _ H1). contradiction. trivial. Qed. Lemma Zmult_reg_r : forall n m p:Z, p <> Z0 -> n * p = m * p -> n = m. Proof. intros x y z Hz. rewrite (Zmult_comm x z). rewrite (Zmult_comm y z). intro; apply Zmult_reg_l with z; assumption. Qed. (** Addition and multiplication by 2 *) Lemma Zplus_diag_eq_mult_2 : forall n:Z, n + n = n * Zpos 2. Proof. intros x; pattern x at 1 2 in |- *; rewrite <- (Zmult_1_r x); rewrite <- Zmult_plus_distr_r; reflexivity. Qed. (** Multiplication and successor *) Lemma Zmult_succ_r : forall n m:Z, n * Zsucc m = n * m + n. Proof. intros n m; unfold Zsucc in |- *; rewrite Zmult_plus_distr_r; rewrite (Zmult_comm n (Zpos 1)); rewrite Zmult_1_l; trivial with arith. Qed. Lemma Zmult_succ_r_reverse : forall n m:Z, n * m + n = n * Zsucc m. Proof. intros; symmetry in |- *; apply Zmult_succ_r. Qed. Lemma Zmult_succ_l : forall n m:Z, Zsucc n * m = n * m + m. Proof. intros n m; unfold Zsucc in |- *; rewrite Zmult_plus_distr_l; rewrite Zmult_1_l; trivial with arith. Qed. Lemma Zmult_succ_l_reverse : forall n m:Z, n * m + m = Zsucc n * m. Proof. intros; symmetry in |- *; apply Zmult_succ_l. Qed. (** Misc redundant properties *) Lemma Z_eq_mult : forall n m:Z, m = Z0 -> m * n = Z0. intros x y H; rewrite H; auto with arith. Qed. (**********************************************************************) (** Relating binary positive numbers and binary integers *) Lemma Zpos_xI : forall p:positive, Zpos (xI p) = Zpos 2 * Zpos p + Zpos 1. Proof. intro; apply refl_equal. Qed. Lemma Zpos_xO : forall p:positive, Zpos (xO p) = Zpos 2 * Zpos p. Proof. intro; apply refl_equal. Qed. Lemma Zneg_xI : forall p:positive, Zneg (xI p) = Zpos 2 * Zneg p - Zpos 1. Proof. intro; apply refl_equal. Qed. Lemma Zneg_xO : forall p:positive, Zneg (xO p) = Zpos 2 * Zneg p. Proof. reflexivity. Qed. Lemma Zpos_plus_distr : forall p q:positive, Zpos (p + q) = Zpos p + Zpos q. Proof. intros p p'; destruct p; [ destruct p' as [p0| p0| ] | destruct p' as [p0| p0| ] | destruct p' as [p| p| ] ]; reflexivity. Qed. Lemma Zneg_plus_distr : forall p q:positive, Zneg (p + q) = Zneg p + Zneg q. Proof. intros p p'; destruct p; [ destruct p' as [p0| p0| ] | destruct p' as [p0| p0| ] | destruct p' as [p| p| ] ]; reflexivity. Qed. (**********************************************************************) (** Order relations *) Definition Zlt (x y:Z) := (x ?= y) = Lt. Definition Zgt (x y:Z) := (x ?= y) = Gt. Definition Zle (x y:Z) := (x ?= y) <> Gt. Definition Zge (x y:Z) := (x ?= y) <> Lt. Definition Zne (x y:Z) := x <> y. Infix "<=" := Zle : Z_scope. Infix "<" := Zlt : Z_scope. Infix ">=" := Zge : Z_scope. Infix ">" := Zgt : Z_scope. Notation "x <= y <= z" := (x <= y /\ y <= z) : Z_scope. Notation "x <= y < z" := (x <= y /\ y < z) : Z_scope. Notation "x < y < z" := (x < y /\ y < z) : Z_scope. Notation "x < y <= z" := (x < y /\ y <= z) : Z_scope. (**********************************************************************) (** Absolute value on integers *) Definition Zabs_nat (x:Z) : nat := match x with | Z0 => 0%nat | Zpos p => nat_of_P p | Zneg p => nat_of_P p end. Definition Zabs (z:Z) : Z := match z with | Z0 => Z0 | Zpos p => Zpos p | Zneg p => Zpos p end. (**********************************************************************) (** From [nat] to [Z] *) Definition Z_of_nat (x:nat) := match x with | O => Z0 | S y => Zpos (P_of_succ_nat y) end. Require Import BinNat. Definition Zabs_N (z:Z) := match z with | Z0 => 0%N | Zpos p => Npos p | Zneg p => Npos p end. Definition Z_of_N (x:N) := match x with | N0 => Z0 | Npos p => Zpos p end.