(************************************************************************) (* v * The Coq Proof Assistant / The Coq Development Team *) (* m ~= n. Proof. intros n m H1 H2; symmetry in H2; false_hyp H2 H1. Qed. Theorem NZE_stepl : forall x y z : NZ, x == y -> x == z -> z == y. Proof. intros x y z H1 H2; now rewrite <- H1. Qed. Declare Left Step NZE_stepl. (* The right step lemma is just the transitivity of NZeq *) Declare Right Step (proj1 (proj2 NZeq_equiv)). Theorem NZsucc_inj : forall n1 n2 : NZ, S n1 == S n2 -> n1 == n2. Proof. intros n1 n2 H. apply NZpred_wd in H. now do 2 rewrite NZpred_succ in H. Qed. (* The following theorem is useful as an equivalence for proving bidirectional induction steps *) Theorem NZsucc_inj_wd : forall n1 n2 : NZ, S n1 == S n2 <-> n1 == n2. Proof. intros; split. apply NZsucc_inj. apply NZsucc_wd. Qed. Theorem NZsucc_inj_wd_neg : forall n m : NZ, S n ~= S m <-> n ~= m. Proof. intros; now rewrite NZsucc_inj_wd. Qed. (* We cannot prove that the predecessor is injective, nor that it is left-inverse to the successor at this point *) Section CentralInduction. Variable A : predicate NZ. Hypothesis A_wd : predicate_wd NZeq A. Add Morphism A with signature NZeq ==> iff as A_morph. Proof. apply A_wd. Qed. Theorem NZcentral_induction : forall z : NZ, A z -> (forall n : NZ, A n <-> A (S n)) -> forall n : NZ, A n. Proof. intros z Base Step; revert Base; pattern z; apply NZinduction. solve_predicate_wd. intro; now apply NZinduction. intro; pose proof (Step n); tauto. Qed. End CentralInduction. Tactic Notation "NZinduct" ident(n) := induction_maker n ltac:(apply NZinduction). Tactic Notation "NZinduct" ident(n) constr(u) := induction_maker n ltac:(apply NZcentral_induction with (z := u)). End NZBasePropFunct.