(* -*- coq-prog-args: ("-emacs-U" "-top" "Coq.Classes.Morphisms"); compile-command: "make -C ../.. TIME='time'" -*- *) (************************************************************************) (* v * The Coq Proof Assistant / The Coq Development Team *) (* Type) (D : B -> Type) (R : A -> B -> Prop) (R' : forall (x : A) (y : B), C x -> D y -> Prop) : (forall x : A, C x) -> (forall x : B, D x) -> Prop := fun f g => forall x y, R x y -> R' x y (f x) (g y). (** The non-dependent version is an instance where we forget dependencies. *) Definition respectful (A B : Type) (R : relation A) (R' : relation B) : relation (A -> B) := Eval compute in @respectful_hetero A A (fun _ => B) (fun _ => B) R (fun _ _ => R'). (** Notations reminiscent of the old syntax for declaring morphisms. *) Delimit Scope signature_scope with signature. Arguments Scope Morphism [type_scope signature_scope]. Notation " R ++> R' " := (@respectful _ _ (R%signature) (R'%signature)) (right associativity, at level 55) : signature_scope. Notation " R ==> R' " := (@respectful _ _ (R%signature) (R'%signature)) (right associativity, at level 55) : signature_scope. Notation " R --> R' " := (@respectful _ _ (inverse (R%signature)) (R'%signature)) (right associativity, at level 55) : signature_scope. Arguments Scope respectful [type_scope type_scope signature_scope signature_scope]. Open Local Scope signature_scope. (** We can build a PER on the Coq function space if we have PERs on the domain and codomain. *) Program Instance respectful_per [ PER A (R : relation A), PER B (R' : relation B) ] : PER (A -> B) (R ==> R'). Next Obligation. Proof with auto. assert(R x0 x0). transitivity y0... symmetry... transitivity (y x0)... Qed. (** Subrelations induce a morphism on the identity, not used for morphism search yet. *) Lemma subrelation_id_morphism [ subrelation A R₁ R₂ ] : Morphism (R₁ ==> R₂) id. Proof. firstorder. Qed. (** The subrelation property goes through products as usual. *) Instance morphisms_subrelation [ sub : subrelation A R₁ R₂ ] : ! subrelation (B -> A) (R ==> R₁) (R ==> R₂). Proof. firstorder. Qed. Instance morphisms_subrelation_left [ sub : subrelation A R₂ R₁ ] : ! subrelation (A -> B) (R₁ ==> R) (R₂ ==> R) | 3. Proof. firstorder. Qed. (** [Morphism] is itself a covariant morphism for [subrelation]. *) Lemma subrelation_morphism [ sub : subrelation A R₁ R₂, mor : Morphism A R₁ m ] : Morphism R₂ m. Proof. intros. apply sub. apply mor. Qed. Instance morphism_subrelation_morphism : Morphism (subrelation ++> @eq _ ==> impl) (@Morphism A). Proof. reduce. subst. firstorder. Qed. (** We use an external tactic to manage the application of subrelation, which is otherwise always applicable. We allow its use only once per branch. *) Inductive subrelation_done : Prop := did_subrelation : subrelation_done. Ltac subrelation_tac := match goal with | [ _ : subrelation_done |- _ ] => fail 1 | [ |- @Morphism _ _ _ ] => let H := fresh "H" in set(H:=did_subrelation) ; eapply @subrelation_morphism end. Hint Extern 4 (@Morphism _ _ _) => subrelation_tac : typeclass_instances. (** Essential subrelation instances for [iff], [impl] and [pointwise_relation]. *) Instance iff_impl_subrelation : subrelation iff impl. Proof. firstorder. Qed. Instance iff_inverse_impl_subrelation : subrelation iff (inverse impl). Proof. firstorder. Qed. Instance pointwise_subrelation [ sub : subrelation A R R' ] : subrelation (pointwise_relation (A:=B) R) (pointwise_relation R') | 4. Proof. reduce. unfold pointwise_relation in *. apply sub. apply H. Qed. (** The complement of a relation conserves its morphisms. *) Program Instance complement_morphism [ mR : Morphism (A -> A -> Prop) (RA ==> RA ==> iff) R ] : Morphism (RA ==> RA ==> iff) (complement R). Next Obligation. Proof. unfold complement. pose (mR x y H x0 y0 H0). intuition. Qed. (** The [inverse] too, actually the [flip] instance is a bit more general. *) Program Instance flip_morphism [ mor : Morphism (A -> B -> C) (RA ==> RB ==> RC) f ] : Morphism (RB ==> RA ==> RC) (flip f). Next Obligation. Proof. apply mor ; auto. Qed. (** Every Transitive relation gives rise to a binary morphism on [impl], contravariant in the first argument, covariant in the second. *) Program Instance trans_contra_co_morphism [ Transitive A R ] : Morphism (R --> R ++> impl) R. Next Obligation. Proof with auto. transitivity x... transitivity x0... Qed. (* (** Dually... *) *) (* Program Instance [ Transitive A R ] => *) (* trans_co_contra_inv_impl_morphism : Morphism (R ++> R --> inverse impl) R. *) (* Next Obligation. *) (* Proof with auto. *) (* apply* trans_contra_co_morphism ; eauto. eauto. *) (* Qed. *) (** Morphism declarations for partial applications. *) Program Instance trans_contra_inv_impl_morphism [ Transitive A R ] : Morphism (R --> inverse impl) (R x). Next Obligation. Proof with auto. transitivity y... Qed. Program Instance trans_co_impl_morphism [ Transitive A R ] : Morphism (R ==> impl) (R x). Next Obligation. Proof with auto. transitivity x0... Qed. Program Instance trans_sym_co_inv_impl_morphism [ Transitive A R, Symmetric A R ] : Morphism (R ==> inverse impl) (R x). Next Obligation. Proof with auto. transitivity y... Qed. Program Instance trans_sym_contra_impl_morphism [ Transitive A R, Symmetric _ R ] : Morphism (R --> impl) (R x). Next Obligation. Proof with auto. transitivity x0... Qed. Program Instance equivalence_partial_app_morphism [ Equivalence A R ] : Morphism (R ==> iff) (R x). Next Obligation. Proof with auto. split. intros ; transitivity x0... intros. transitivity y... symmetry... Qed. (** Every Transitive relation induces a morphism by "pushing" an [R x y] on the left of an [R x z] proof to get an [R y z] goal. *) Program Instance trans_co_eq_inv_impl_morphism [ Transitive A R ] : Morphism (R ==> (@eq A) ==> inverse impl) R. Next Obligation. Proof with auto. transitivity y... Qed. (* Program Instance [ Transitive A R ] => *) (* trans_contra_eq_impl_morphism : Morphism (R --> (@eq A) ==> impl) R. *) (* Next Obligation. *) (* Proof with auto. *) (* transitivity x... *) (* Qed. *) (** Every Symmetric and Transitive relation gives rise to an equivariant morphism. *) Program Instance trans_sym_morphism [ Transitive A R, Symmetric _ R ] : Morphism (R ==> R ==> iff) R. Next Obligation. Proof with auto. split ; intros. transitivity x0... transitivity x... transitivity y... transitivity y0... Qed. Program Instance equiv_morphism [ Equivalence A R ] : Morphism (R ==> R ==> iff) R. Next Obligation. Proof with auto. split ; intros. transitivity x0... transitivity x... symmetry... transitivity y... transitivity y0... symmetry... Qed. (** In case the rewrite happens at top level. *) Program Instance iff_inverse_impl_id : Morphism (iff ==> inverse impl) id. Program Instance inverse_iff_inverse_impl_id : Morphism (iff --> inverse impl) id. Program Instance iff_impl_id : Morphism (iff ==> impl) id. Program Instance inverse_iff_impl_id : Morphism (iff --> impl) id. (** Coq functions are morphisms for leibniz equality, applied only if really needed. *) (* Instance (A : Type) [ Reflexive B R ] => *) (* eq_reflexive_morphism : Morphism (@Logic.eq A ==> R) m | 3. *) (* Proof. simpl_relation. Qed. *) Instance reflexive_eq_dom_reflexive (A : Type) [ Reflexive B R' ] : Reflexive (@Logic.eq A ==> R'). Proof. simpl_relation. Qed. (** [respectful] is a morphism for relation equivalence. *) Instance respectful_morphism : Morphism (relation_equivalence ++> relation_equivalence ++> relation_equivalence) (@respectful A B). Proof. reduce. unfold respectful, relation_equivalence, predicate_equivalence in * ; simpl in *. split ; intros. rewrite <- H0. apply H1. rewrite H. assumption. rewrite H0. apply H1. rewrite <- H. assumption. Qed. (** Every element in the carrier of a reflexive relation is a morphism for this relation. We use a proxy class for this case which is used internally to discharge reflexivity constraints. The [Reflexive] instance will almost always be used, but it won't apply in general to any kind of [Morphism (A -> B) _ _] goal, making proof-search much slower. A cleaner solution would be to be able to set different priorities in different hint bases and select a particular hint database for resolution of a type class constraint.*) Class MorphismProxy A (R : relation A) (m : A) : Prop := respect_proxy : R m m. Instance reflexive_morphism_proxy [ Reflexive A R ] (x : A) : MorphismProxy A R x | 1. Proof. firstorder. Qed. Instance morphism_morphism_proxy [ Morphism A R x ] : MorphismProxy A R x | 2. Proof. firstorder. Qed. (* Instance (A : Type) [ Reflexive B R ] => *) (* eq_reflexive_morphism : Morphism (@Logic.eq A ==> R) m | 3. *) (* Proof. simpl_relation. Qed. *) (** [R] is Reflexive, hence we can build the needed proof. *) Lemma Reflexive_partial_app_morphism [ Morphism (A -> B) (R ==> R') m, MorphismProxy A R x ] : Morphism R' (m x). Proof. simpl_relation. Qed. Ltac partial_application_tactic := let tac x := match type of x with | Type => fail 1 | _ => eapply @Reflexive_partial_app_morphism end in let on_morphism m := match m with | ?m' ?x => tac x | ?m' _ ?x => tac x | ?m' _ _ ?x => tac x | ?m' _ _ _ ?x => tac x | ?m' _ _ _ _ ?x => tac x | ?m' _ _ _ _ _ ?x => tac x | ?m' _ _ _ _ _ _ ?x => tac x | ?m' _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ?x => tac x | ?m' _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ?x => tac x end in match goal with | [ |- @Morphism _ _ ?m ] => on_morphism m end. (* Program Instance [ Morphism (A -> B) (R ==> R') m, Reflexive A R ] (x : A) => *) (* reflexive_partial_app_morphism : Morphism R' (m x). *) Hint Extern 4 (@Morphism _ _ _) => partial_application_tactic : typeclass_instances. Lemma inverse_respectful : forall (A : Type) (R : relation A) (B : Type) (R' : relation B), relation_equivalence (inverse (R ==> R')) (inverse R ==> inverse R'). Proof. intros. unfold flip, respectful. split ; intros ; intuition. Qed. (** Special-purpose class to do normalization of signatures w.r.t. inverse. *) Class (A : Type) => Normalizes (m : relation A) (m' : relation A) : Prop := normalizes : relation_equivalence m m'. Instance inverse_respectful_norm : Normalizes (A -> B) (inverse R ==> inverse R') (inverse (R ==> R')) . Proof. firstorder. Qed. (* If not an inverse on the left, do a double inverse. *) Instance not_inverse_respectful_norm : Normalizes (A -> B) (R ==> inverse R') (inverse (inverse R ==> R')) | 4. Proof. firstorder. Qed. Instance inverse_respectful_rec_norm [ Normalizes B R' (inverse R'') ] : Normalizes (A -> B) (inverse R ==> R') (inverse (R ==> R'')). Proof. red ; intros. pose normalizes as r. setoid_rewrite r. setoid_rewrite inverse_respectful. reflexivity. Qed. (** Once we have normalized, we will apply this instance to simplify the problem. *) Program Instance morphism_inverse_morphism [ Morphism A R m ] : Morphism (inverse R) m | 2. (** Bootstrap !!! *) Instance morphism_morphism : Morphism (relation_equivalence ==> @eq _ ==> iff) (@Morphism A). Proof. simpl_relation. reduce in H. split ; red ; intros. setoid_rewrite <- H. apply H0. setoid_rewrite H. apply H0. Qed. Lemma morphism_releq_morphism [ Normalizes A R R', Morphism _ R' m ] : Morphism R m. Proof. intros. pose respect as r. pose normalizes as norm. setoid_rewrite norm. assumption. Qed. Inductive normalization_done : Prop := did_normalization. Ltac morphism_normalization := match goal with | [ _ : normalization_done |- _ ] => fail 1 | [ |- @Morphism _ _ _ ] => let H := fresh "H" in set(H:=did_normalization) ; eapply @morphism_releq_morphism end. Hint Extern 6 (@Morphism _ _ _) => morphism_normalization : typeclass_instances. (** Every reflexive relation gives rise to a morphism, only for immediately solving goals without variables. *) Lemma reflexive_morphism [ Reflexive A R ] (x : A) : Morphism R x. Proof. firstorder. Qed. Ltac morphism_reflexive := match goal with | [ _ : normalization_done |- _ ] => fail 1 | [ _ : subrelation_done |- _ ] => fail 1 | [ |- @Morphism _ _ _ ] => eapply @reflexive_morphism end. Hint Extern 4 (@Morphism _ _ _) => morphism_reflexive : typeclass_instances.