Goal forall a b c : nat, a = b -> b = c -> forall d, a+d=c+d. intros. (* "compatibility" mode: specializing a global name means a kind of generalize *) specialize eq_trans. intros _. specialize eq_trans with (1:=H)(2:=H0). intros _. specialize eq_trans with (x:=a)(y:=b)(z:=c). intros _. specialize eq_trans with (1:=H)(z:=c). intros _. specialize eq_trans with nat a b c. intros _. specialize (@eq_trans nat). intros _. specialize (@eq_trans _ a b c). intros _. specialize (eq_trans (x:=a)). intros _. specialize (eq_trans (x:=a)(y:=b)). intros _. specialize (eq_trans H H0). intros _. specialize (eq_trans H0 (z:=b)). intros _. (* local "in place" specialization *) assert (Eq:=eq_trans). specialize Eq. specialize Eq with (1:=H)(2:=H0). Undo. specialize Eq with (x:=a)(y:=b)(z:=c). Undo. specialize Eq with (1:=H)(z:=c). Undo. specialize Eq with nat a b c. Undo. specialize (Eq nat). Undo. specialize (Eq _ a b c). Undo. (* no implicit argument for Eq, hence no (Eq (x:=a)) *) specialize (Eq _ _ _ _ H H0). Undo. specialize (Eq _ _ _ b H0). Undo. (* (** strange behavior to inspect more precisely *) (* 1) proof aspect : let H:= ... in (fun H => ..) H presque ok... *) (* 2) echoue moins lorsque zero premise de mangé *) specialize eq_trans with (1:=Eq). (* mal typé !! *) (* 3) *) specialize eq_trans with _ a b c. intros _. (* Anomaly: Evar ?88 was not declared. Please report. *) *) Abort. (* Test use of pose proof and assert as a specialize *) Goal True -> (True -> 0=0) -> False -> 0=0. intros H0 H H1. pose proof (H I) as H. (* Check that the hypothesis is in 2nd position by removing the top one *) match goal with H:_ |- _ => clear H end. match goal with H:_ |- _ => exact H end. Qed. Goal True -> (True -> 0=0) -> False -> 0=0. intros H0 H H1. assert (H:=H I). (* Check that the hypothesis is in 2nd position by removing the top one *) match goal with H:_ |- _ => clear H end. match goal with H:_ |- _ => exact H end. Qed. (* Test specialize as *) Goal (forall x, x=0) -> 1=0. intros. specialize (H 1) as ->. reflexivity. Qed.