(**********************************************************************) (* Notations for if and let (submitted by Roland Zumkeller) *) Notation "a ? b ; c" := (if a then b else c) (at level 10). Check (true ? 0 ; 1). Check if true as x return (if x then nat else bool) then 0 else true. Notation "'proj1' t" := (let (a,_) := t in a) (at level 1). Check (fun e : nat * nat => proj1 e). Notation "'decomp' a 'as' x , y 'in' b" := (let (x,y) := a in b) (at level 1). Check (decomp (true,true) as t, u in (t,u)). (**********************************************************************) (* Behaviour wrt to binding variables (submitted by Roland Zumkeller) *) Notation "! A" := (forall _:nat, A) (at level 60). Check ! (0=0). Check forall n, n=0. Check forall n:nat, 0=0. (**********************************************************************) (* Conflict between notation and notation below coercions *) (* Case of a printer conflict *) Require Import BinInt. Coercion Zpos : positive >-> Z. Open Scope Z_scope. (* Check that (Zpos 3) is better printed by the printer for Z than by the printer for positive *) Check (3 + Zpos 3). (* Case of a num printer only below coercion (submitted by Georges Gonthier) *) Open Scope nat_scope. Inductive znat : Set := Zpos (n : nat) | Zneg (m : nat). Coercion Zpos: nat >-> znat. Delimit Scope znat_scope with znat. Open Scope znat_scope. Variable addz : znat -> znat -> znat. Notation "z1 + z2" := (addz z1 z2) : znat_scope. (* Check that "3+3", where 3 is in nat and the coercion to znat is implicit, is printed the same way, and not "S 2 + S 2" as if numeral printing was only tested with coercion still present *) Check (3+3). (**********************************************************************) (* Check recursive notations *) Require Import List. Notation "[ x ; .. ; y ]" := (cons x .. (cons y nil) ..). Check [1;2;4]. Reserved Notation "( x ; y , .. , z )" (at level 0). Notation "( x ; y , .. , z )" := (pair .. (pair x y) .. z). Check (1;2,4).