(* Cases with let-in in constructors types *) Inductive t : Set := k : let x := t in x -> x. Print t_rect. Record TT : Type := CTT { f1 := 0 : nat; f2: nat; f3 : f1=f1 }. Eval cbv in fun d:TT => match d return 0 = 0 with CTT a _ b => b end. Eval lazy in fun d:TT => match d return 0 = 0 with CTT a _ b => b end. (* Do not contract nested patterns with dependent return type *) (* see bug #1699 *) Require Import Arith. Definition proj (x y:nat) (P:nat -> Type) (def:P x) (prf:P y) : P y := match eq_nat_dec x y return P y with | left eqprf => match eqprf in (_ = z) return (P z) with | refl_equal => def end | _ => prf end. Print proj. (* Use notations even below aliases *) Require Import List. Fixpoint foo (A:Type) (l:list A) : option A := match l with | nil => None | x0 :: nil => Some x0 | x0 :: (x1 :: xs) as l0 => foo A l0 end. Print foo. (* Accept and use notation with binded parameters *) Inductive I (A: Type) : Type := C : A -> I A. Notation "x <: T" := (C T x) (at level 38). Definition uncast A (x : I A) := match x with | x <: _ => x end. Print uncast. (* Do not duplicate the matched term *) Axiom A : nat -> bool. Definition foo' := match A 0 with | true => true | x => x end. Print foo'. (* Was bug #3293 (eta-expansion at "match" printing time was failing because of let-in's interpreted as being part of the expansion) *) Axiom b : bool. Axiom P : bool -> Prop. Inductive B : Prop := AC : P b -> B. Definition f : B -> True. Proof. intros [x]. destruct b as [|] ; exact Logic.I. Defined. Print f. (* Was enhancement request #5142 (error message reported on the most general return clause heuristic) *) Inductive gadt : Type -> Type := | gadtNat : nat -> gadt nat | gadtTy : forall T, T -> gadt T. Fail Definition gadt_id T (x: gadt T) : gadt T := match x with | gadtNat n => gadtNat n end. (* A variant of #5142 (see Satrajit Roy's example on coq-club (Oct 17, 2016)) *) Inductive type:Set:=Nat. Inductive tbinop:type->type->type->Set:= TPlus : tbinop Nat Nat Nat. Inductive texp:type->Set:= |TNConst:nat->texp Nat |TBinop:forall t1 t2 t, tbinop t1 t2 t->texp t1->texp t2->texp t. Definition typeDenote(t:type):Set:= match t with Nat => nat end. (* We expect a failure on TBinop *) Fail Fixpoint texpDenote t (e:texp t):typeDenote t:= match e with | TNConst n => n | TBinop t1 t2 _ b e1 e2 => O end.