(************************************************************************) (* v * The Coq Proof Assistant / The Coq Development Team *) (* mt()) let explain_logic_error_no_anomaly = ref (fun e -> mt()) let msg_tac_debug s = Proofview.NonLogical.print_debug (s++fnl()) let msg_tac_notice s = Proofview.NonLogical.print_notice (s++fnl()) (* Prints the goal *) let db_pr_goal gl = let env = Proofview.Goal.env gl in let concl = Proofview.Goal.concl gl in let penv = print_named_context env in let pc = print_constr_env env concl in str" " ++ hv 0 (penv ++ fnl () ++ str "============================" ++ fnl () ++ str" " ++ pc) ++ fnl () let db_pr_goal = Proofview.Goal.nf_enter begin fun gl -> let pg = db_pr_goal gl in Proofview.tclLIFT (msg_tac_notice (str "Goal:" ++ fnl () ++ pg)) end (* Prints the commands *) let help () = msg_tac_debug (str "Commands: = Continue" ++ fnl() ++ str " h/? = Help" ++ fnl() ++ str " r = Run times" ++ fnl() ++ str " r = Run up to next idtac " ++ fnl() ++ str " s = Skip" ++ fnl() ++ str " x = Exit") (* Prints the goal and the command to be executed *) let goal_com tac = Proofview.tclTHEN db_pr_goal (Proofview.tclLIFT (msg_tac_debug (str "Going to execute:" ++ fnl () ++ Hook.get prtac tac))) (* [run (new_ref _)] gives us a ref shared among [NonLogical.t] expressions. It avoids parametrizing everything over a reference. *) let skipped = Proofview.NonLogical.run (Proofview.NonLogical.ref 0) let skip = Proofview.NonLogical.run (Proofview.NonLogical.ref 0) let breakpoint = Proofview.NonLogical.run (Proofview.NonLogical.ref None) let rec drop_spaces inst i = if String.length inst > i && inst.[i] == ' ' then drop_spaces inst (i+1) else i let possibly_unquote s = if String.length s >= 2 && s.[0] == '"' && s.[String.length s - 1] == '"' then String.sub s 1 (String.length s - 2) else s (* (Re-)initialize debugger *) let db_initialize = let open Proofview.NonLogical in (skip:=0) >> (skipped:=0) >> (breakpoint:=None) let int_of_string s = try Proofview.NonLogical.return (int_of_string s) with e -> Proofview.NonLogical.raise e let string_get s i = try Proofview.NonLogical.return (String.get s i) with e -> Proofview.NonLogical.raise e (* Gives the number of steps or next breakpoint of a run command *) let run_com inst = let open Proofview.NonLogical in string_get inst 0 >>= fun first_char -> if first_char ='r' then let i = drop_spaces inst 1 in if String.length inst > i then let s = String.sub inst i (String.length inst - i) in if inst.[0] >= '0' && inst.[0] <= '9' then int_of_string s >>= fun num -> (if num<0 then invalid_arg "run_com" else return ()) >> (skip:=num) >> (skipped:=0) else breakpoint:=Some (possibly_unquote s) else invalid_arg "run_com" else invalid_arg "run_com" (* Prints the run counter *) let run ini = let open Proofview.NonLogical in if not ini then begin Proofview.NonLogical.print_notice (str"\b\r\b\r") >> !skipped >>= fun skipped -> msg_tac_debug (str "Executed expressions: " ++ int skipped ++ fnl()) end >> !skipped >>= fun x -> skipped := x+1 else return () (* Prints the prompt *) let rec prompt level = (* spiwack: avoid overriding by the open below *) let runtrue = run true in begin let open Proofview.NonLogical in Proofview.NonLogical.print_notice (fnl () ++ str "TcDebug (" ++ int level ++ str ") > ") >> let exit = (skip:=0) >> (skipped:=0) >> raise Sys.Break in Proofview.NonLogical.catch Proofview.NonLogical.read_line begin function (e, info) -> match e with | End_of_file -> exit | e -> raise ~info e end >>= fun inst -> match inst with | "" -> return (DebugOn (level+1)) | "s" -> return (DebugOff) | "x" -> Proofview.NonLogical.print_char '\b' >> exit | "h"| "?" -> begin help () >> prompt level end | _ -> Proofview.NonLogical.catch (run_com inst >> runtrue >> return (DebugOn (level+1))) begin function (e, info) -> match e with | Failure _ | Invalid_argument _ -> prompt level | e -> raise ~info e end end (* Prints the state and waits for an instruction *) (* spiwack: the only reason why we need to take the continuation [f] as an argument rather than returning the new level directly seems to be that [f] is wrapped in with "explain_logic_error". I don't think it serves any purpose in the current design, so we could just drop that. *) let debug_prompt lev tac f = (* spiwack: avoid overriding by the open below *) let runfalse = run false in let open Proofview.NonLogical in let (>=) = Proofview.tclBIND in (* What to print and to do next *) let newlevel = Proofview.tclLIFT !skip >= fun initial_skip -> if Int.equal initial_skip 0 then Proofview.tclLIFT !breakpoint >= fun breakpoint -> if Option.is_empty breakpoint then Proofview.tclTHEN (goal_com tac) (Proofview.tclLIFT (prompt lev)) else Proofview.tclLIFT(runfalse >> return (DebugOn (lev+1))) else Proofview.tclLIFT begin (!skip >>= fun s -> skip:=s-1) >> runfalse >> !skip >>= fun new_skip -> (if Int.equal new_skip 0 then skipped:=0 else return ()) >> return (DebugOn (lev+1)) end in newlevel >= fun newlevel -> (* What to execute *) Proofview.tclOR (f newlevel) begin fun (reraise, info) -> Proofview.tclTHEN (Proofview.tclLIFT begin (skip:=0) >> (skipped:=0) >> if Logic.catchable_exception reraise then msg_tac_debug (str "Level " ++ int lev ++ str ": " ++ Pervasives.(!) explain_logic_error reraise) else return () end) (Proofview.tclZERO ~info reraise) end let is_debug db = let open Proofview.NonLogical in !breakpoint >>= fun breakpoint -> match db, breakpoint with | DebugOff, _ -> return false | _, Some _ -> return false | _ -> !skip >>= fun skip -> return (Int.equal skip 0) (* Prints a constr *) let db_constr debug env c = let open Proofview.NonLogical in is_debug debug >>= fun db -> if db then msg_tac_debug (str "Evaluated term: " ++ print_constr_env env c) else return () (* Prints the pattern rule *) let db_pattern_rule debug num r = let open Proofview.NonLogical in is_debug debug >>= fun db -> if db then begin msg_tac_debug (str "Pattern rule " ++ int num ++ str ":" ++ fnl () ++ str "|" ++ spc () ++ Hook.get prmatchrl r) end else return () (* Prints the hypothesis pattern identifier if it exists *) let hyp_bound = function | Anonymous -> str " (unbound)" | Name id -> str " (bound to " ++ pr_id id ++ str ")" (* Prints a matched hypothesis *) let db_matched_hyp debug env (id,_,c) ido = let open Proofview.NonLogical in is_debug debug >>= fun db -> if db then msg_tac_debug (str "Hypothesis " ++ pr_id id ++ hyp_bound ido ++ str " has been matched: " ++ print_constr_env env c) else return () (* Prints the matched conclusion *) let db_matched_concl debug env c = let open Proofview.NonLogical in is_debug debug >>= fun db -> if db then msg_tac_debug (str "Conclusion has been matched: " ++ print_constr_env env c) else return () (* Prints a success message when the goal has been matched *) let db_mc_pattern_success debug = let open Proofview.NonLogical in is_debug debug >>= fun db -> if db then msg_tac_debug (str "The goal has been successfully matched!" ++ fnl() ++ str "Let us execute the right-hand side part..." ++ fnl()) else return () (* Prints a failure message for an hypothesis pattern *) let db_hyp_pattern_failure debug env sigma (na,hyp) = let open Proofview.NonLogical in is_debug debug >>= fun db -> if db then msg_tac_debug (str "The pattern hypothesis" ++ hyp_bound na ++ str " cannot match: " ++ Hook.get prmatchpatt env sigma hyp) else return () (* Prints a matching failure message for a rule *) let db_matching_failure debug = let open Proofview.NonLogical in is_debug debug >>= fun db -> if db then msg_tac_debug (str "This rule has failed due to matching errors!" ++ fnl() ++ str "Let us try the next one...") else return () (* Prints an evaluation failure message for a rule *) let db_eval_failure debug s = let open Proofview.NonLogical in is_debug debug >>= fun db -> if db then let s = str "message \"" ++ s ++ str "\"" in msg_tac_debug (str "This rule has failed due to \"Fail\" tactic (" ++ s ++ str ", level 0)!" ++ fnl() ++ str "Let us try the next one...") else return () (* Prints a logic failure message for a rule *) let db_logic_failure debug err = let open Proofview.NonLogical in is_debug debug >>= fun db -> if db then begin msg_tac_debug (Pervasives.(!) explain_logic_error err) >> msg_tac_debug (str "This rule has failed due to a logic error!" ++ fnl() ++ str "Let us try the next one...") end else return () let is_breakpoint brkname s = match brkname, s with | Some s, MsgString s'::_ -> String.equal s s' | _ -> false let db_breakpoint debug s = let open Proofview.NonLogical in !breakpoint >>= fun opt_breakpoint -> match debug with | DebugOn lev when not (CList.is_empty s) && is_breakpoint opt_breakpoint s -> breakpoint:=None | _ -> return ()