(************************************************************************) (* v * The Coq Proof Assistant / The Coq Development Team *) (* Errors.errorlabstrm "Some timeout function" (Pp.str"Timeout!") | Exception e -> Errors.print e | TacticFailure e -> Errors.print e | _ -> Pervasives.raise Errors.Unhandled end (** {6 Non-logical layer} *) (** The non-logical monad is a simple [unit -> 'a] (i/o) monad. The operations are simple wrappers around corresponding usual operations and require little documentation. *) module NonLogical = struct (* The functions in this module follow the pattern that they are defined with the form [(); fun ()->...]. This is an optimisation which signals to the compiler that the function is usually partially applied up to the [();]. Without this annotation, partial applications can be significantly slower. Documentation of this behaviour can be found at: https://ocaml.janestreet.com/?q=node/30 *) include Monad.Make(struct type 'a t = unit -> 'a let return a = (); fun () -> a let (>>=) a k = (); fun () -> k (a ()) () let (>>) a k = (); fun () -> a (); k () let map f a = (); fun () -> f (a ()) end) type 'a ref = 'a Pervasives.ref let ignore a = (); fun () -> ignore (a ()) let ref a = (); fun () -> Pervasives.ref a (** [Pervasives.(:=)] *) let (:=) r a = (); fun () -> r := a (** [Pervasives.(!)] *) let (!) = fun r -> (); fun () -> ! r (** [Pervasives.raise]. Except that exceptions are wrapped with {!Exception}. *) let raise ?info = fun e -> (); fun () -> Exninfo.raise ?info (Exception e) (** [try ... with ...] but restricted to {!Exception}. *) let catch = fun s h -> (); fun () -> try s () with Exception e as src -> let (src, info) = Errors.push src in h (e, info) () let read_line = fun () -> try Pervasives.read_line () with e -> let (e, info) = Errors.push e in raise ~info e () let print_char = fun c -> (); fun () -> print_char c let timeout = fun n t -> (); fun () -> Control.timeout n t (Exception Timeout) let make f = (); fun () -> try f () with e when Errors.noncritical e -> let (e, info) = Errors.push e in Util.iraise (Exception e, info) (** Use the current logger. The buffer is also flushed. *) let print_debug s = make (fun _ -> Pp.msg_info s;Pp.pp_flush ()) let print_info s = make (fun _ -> Pp.msg_info s;Pp.pp_flush ()) let print_warning s = make (fun _ -> Pp.msg_warning s;Pp.pp_flush ()) let print_error s = make (fun _ -> Pp.msg_error s;Pp.pp_flush ()) let print_notice s = make (fun _ -> Pp.msg_notice s;Pp.pp_flush ()) let run = fun x -> try x () with Exception e as src -> let (src, info) = Errors.push src in Util.iraise (e, info) end (** {6 Logical layer} *) (** The logical monad is a backtracking monad on top of which is layered a state monad (which is used to implement all of read/write, read only, and write only effects). The state monad being layered on top of the backtracking monad makes it so that the state is backtracked on failure. Backtracking differs from regular exception in that, writing (+) for exception catching and (>>=) for bind, we require the following extra distributivity laws: x+(y+z) = (x+y)+z zero+x = x x+zero = x (x+y)>>=k = (x>>=k)+(y>>=k) *) (** A view type for the logical monad, which is a form of list, hence we can decompose it with as a list. *) type ('a, 'b) list_view = | Nil of Exninfo.iexn | Cons of 'a * 'b module type Param = sig (** Read only *) type e (** Write only *) type w (** [w] must be a monoid *) val wunit : w val wprod : w -> w -> w (** Read-write *) type s (** Update-only. Essentially a writer on [u->u]. *) type u (** [u] must be pointed. *) val uunit : u end module Logical (P:Param) = struct (** All three of environment, writer and state are coded as a single state-passing-style monad.*) type state = { rstate : P.e; ustate : P.u; wstate : P.w; sstate : P.s; } (** Double-continuation backtracking monads are reasonable folklore for "search" implementations (including the Tac interactive prover's tactics). Yet it's quite hard to wrap your head around these. I recommand reading a few times the "Backtracking, Interleaving, and Terminating Monad Transformers" paper by O. Kiselyov, C. Shan, D. Friedman, and A. Sabry. The peculiar shape of the monadic type is reminiscent of that of the continuation monad transformer. The paper also contains the rationale for the [split] abstraction. An explanation of how to derive such a monad from mathematical principles can be found in "Kan Extensions for Program Optimisation" by Ralf Hinze. A somewhat concrete view is that the type ['a iolist] is, in fact the impredicative encoding of the following stream type: [type 'a _iolist' = Nil of exn | Cons of 'a*'a iolist' and 'a iolist = 'a _iolist NonLogical.t] Using impredicative encoding avoids intermediate allocation and is, empirically, very efficient in Ocaml. It also has the practical benefit that the monadic operation are independent of the underlying monad, which simplifies the code and side-steps the limited inlining of Ocaml. In that vision, [bind] is simply [concat_map] (though the cps version is significantly simpler), [plus] is concatenation, and [split] is pattern-matching. *) type rich_exn = Exninfo.iexn type 'a iolist = { iolist : 'r. state -> (rich_exn -> 'r NonLogical.t) -> ('a -> state -> (rich_exn -> 'r NonLogical.t) -> 'r NonLogical.t) -> 'r NonLogical.t } include Monad.Make(struct type 'a t = 'a iolist let return x = { iolist = fun s nil cons -> cons x s nil } let (>>=) m f = { iolist = fun s nil cons -> m.iolist s nil (fun x s next -> (f x).iolist s next cons) } let (>>) m f = { iolist = fun s nil cons -> m.iolist s nil (fun () s next -> f.iolist s next cons) } let map f m = { iolist = fun s nil cons -> m.iolist s nil (fun x s next -> cons (f x) s next) } end) let zero e = { iolist = fun _ nil cons -> nil e } let plus m1 m2 = { iolist = fun s nil cons -> m1.iolist s (fun e -> (m2 e).iolist s nil cons) cons } let ignore m = { iolist = fun s nil cons -> m.iolist s nil (fun _ s next -> cons () s next) } let lift m = { iolist = fun s nil cons -> NonLogical.(m >>= fun x -> cons x s nil) } (** State related *) let get = { iolist = fun s nil cons -> cons s.sstate s nil } let set (sstate : P.s) = { iolist = fun s nil cons -> cons () { s with sstate } nil } let modify (f : P.s -> P.s) = { iolist = fun s nil cons -> cons () { s with sstate = f s.sstate } nil } let current = { iolist = fun s nil cons -> cons s.rstate s nil } let local e m = { iolist = fun s nil cons -> m.iolist { s with rstate = e } nil (fun x s' next -> cons x {s' with rstate = s.rstate} next) } let put w = { iolist = fun s nil cons -> cons () { s with wstate = P.wprod s.wstate w } nil } let update (f : P.u -> P.u) = { iolist = fun s nil cons -> cons () { s with ustate = f s.ustate } nil } (** List observation *) let once m = { iolist = fun s nil cons -> m.iolist s nil (fun x s _ -> cons x s nil) } let break f m = { iolist = fun s nil cons -> m.iolist s nil (fun x s next -> cons x s (fun e -> match f e with None -> next e | Some e -> nil e)) } (** For [reflect] and [split] see the "Backtracking, Interleaving, and Terminating Monad Transformers" paper. *) type 'a reified = ('a, rich_exn -> 'a reified) list_view NonLogical.t let rec reflect (m : ('a * state) reified) : 'a iolist = { iolist = fun s0 nil cons -> let next = function | Nil e -> nil e | Cons ((x, s), l) -> cons x s (fun e -> (reflect (l e)).iolist s0 nil cons) in NonLogical.(m >>= next) } let split m : ('a, rich_exn -> 'a t) list_view t = let rnil e = NonLogical.return (Nil e) in let rcons p s l = NonLogical.return (Cons ((p, s), l)) in { iolist = fun s nil cons -> let open NonLogical in m.iolist s rnil rcons >>= begin function | Nil e -> cons (Nil e) s nil | Cons ((x, s), l) -> let l e = reflect (l e) in cons (Cons (x, l)) s nil end } let run m r s = let s = { wstate = P.wunit; ustate = P.uunit; rstate = r; sstate = s } in let rnil e = NonLogical.return (Nil e) in let rcons x s l = let p = (x, s.sstate, s.wstate, s.ustate) in NonLogical.return (Cons (p, l)) in m.iolist s rnil rcons let repr x = x end