(************************************************************************) (* v * The Coq Proof Assistant / The Coq Development Team *) (* CClosure.whd_val infos (CClosure.inject t)) let whd_delta env= let infos=CClosure.create_clos_infos CClosure.all env in (fun t -> CClosure.whd_val infos (CClosure.inject t)) (* decompose member of equality in an applicative format *) (** FIXME: evar leak *) let sf_of env sigma c = e_sort_of env (ref sigma) c let rec decompose_term env sigma t= match kind_of_term (whd env t) with App (f,args)-> let tf=decompose_term env sigma f in let targs=Array.map (decompose_term env sigma) args in Array.fold_left (fun s t->Appli (s,t)) tf targs | Prod (_,a,_b) when not (Termops.dependent (mkRel 1) _b) -> let b = Termops.pop _b in let sort_b = sf_of env sigma b in let sort_a = sf_of env sigma a in Appli(Appli(Product (sort_a,sort_b) , decompose_term env sigma a), decompose_term env sigma b) | Construct c -> let (((mind,i_ind),i_con),u)= c in let canon_mind = mind_of_kn (canonical_mind mind) in let canon_ind = canon_mind,i_ind in let (oib,_)=Global.lookup_inductive (canon_ind) in let nargs=constructor_nallargs_env env (canon_ind,i_con) in Constructor {ci_constr= ((canon_ind,i_con),u); ci_arity=nargs; ci_nhyps=nargs-oib.mind_nparams} | Ind c -> let (mind,i_ind),u = c in let canon_mind = mind_of_kn (canonical_mind mind) in let canon_ind = canon_mind,i_ind in (Symb (mkIndU (canon_ind,u))) | Const (c,u) -> let canon_const = constant_of_kn (canonical_con c) in (Symb (mkConstU (canon_const,u))) | Proj (p, c) -> let canon_const kn = constant_of_kn (canonical_con kn) in let p' = Projection.map canon_const p in (Appli (Symb (mkConst (Projection.constant p')), decompose_term env sigma c)) | _ -> let t = strip_outer_cast t in if closed0 t then Symb t else raise Not_found (* decompose equality in members and type *) open Globnames let atom_of_constr env sigma term = let wh = (whd_delta env term) in let kot = kind_of_term wh in match kot with App (f,args)-> if is_global (Lazy.force _eq) f && Int.equal (Array.length args) 3 then `Eq (args.(0), decompose_term env sigma args.(1), decompose_term env sigma args.(2)) else `Other (decompose_term env sigma term) | _ -> `Other (decompose_term env sigma term) let rec pattern_of_constr env sigma c = match kind_of_term (whd env c) with App (f,args)-> let pf = decompose_term env sigma f in let pargs,lrels = List.split (Array.map_to_list (pattern_of_constr env sigma) args) in PApp (pf,List.rev pargs), List.fold_left Int.Set.union Int.Set.empty lrels | Prod (_,a,_b) when not (Termops.dependent (mkRel 1) _b) -> let b = Termops.pop _b in let pa,sa = pattern_of_constr env sigma a in let pb,sb = pattern_of_constr env sigma b in let sort_b = sf_of env sigma b in let sort_a = sf_of env sigma a in PApp(Product (sort_a,sort_b), [pa;pb]),(Int.Set.union sa sb) | Rel i -> PVar i,Int.Set.singleton i | _ -> let pf = decompose_term env sigma c in PApp (pf,[]),Int.Set.empty let non_trivial = function PVar _ -> false | _ -> true let patterns_of_constr env sigma nrels term= let f,args= try destApp (whd_delta env term) with DestKO -> raise Not_found in if is_global (Lazy.force _eq) f && Int.equal (Array.length args) 3 then let patt1,rels1 = pattern_of_constr env sigma args.(1) and patt2,rels2 = pattern_of_constr env sigma args.(2) in let valid1 = if not (Int.equal (Int.Set.cardinal rels1) nrels) then Creates_variables else if non_trivial patt1 then Normal else Trivial args.(0) and valid2 = if not (Int.equal (Int.Set.cardinal rels2) nrels) then Creates_variables else if non_trivial patt2 then Normal else Trivial args.(0) in if valid1 != Creates_variables || valid2 != Creates_variables then nrels,valid1,patt1,valid2,patt2 else raise Not_found else raise Not_found let rec quantified_atom_of_constr env sigma nrels term = match kind_of_term (whd_delta env term) with Prod (id,atom,ff) -> if is_global (Lazy.force _False) ff then let patts=patterns_of_constr env sigma nrels atom in `Nrule patts else quantified_atom_of_constr (Environ.push_rel (LocalAssum (id,atom)) env) sigma (succ nrels) ff | _ -> let patts=patterns_of_constr env sigma nrels term in `Rule patts let litteral_of_constr env sigma term= match kind_of_term (whd_delta env term) with | Prod (id,atom,ff) -> if is_global (Lazy.force _False) ff then match (atom_of_constr env sigma atom) with `Eq(t,a,b) -> `Neq(t,a,b) | `Other(p) -> `Nother(p) else begin try quantified_atom_of_constr (Environ.push_rel (LocalAssum (id,atom)) env) sigma 1 ff with Not_found -> `Other (decompose_term env sigma term) end | _ -> atom_of_constr env sigma term (* store all equalities from the context *) let make_prb gls depth additionnal_terms = let env=pf_env gls in let sigma=sig_sig gls in let state = empty depth gls in let pos_hyps = ref [] in let neg_hyps =ref [] in List.iter (fun c -> let t = decompose_term env sigma c in ignore (add_term state t)) additionnal_terms; List.iter (fun decl -> let (id,_,e) = Context.Named.Declaration.to_tuple decl in begin let cid=mkVar id in match litteral_of_constr env sigma e with `Eq (t,a,b) -> add_equality state cid a b | `Neq (t,a,b) -> add_disequality state (Hyp cid) a b | `Other ph -> List.iter (fun (cidn,nh) -> add_disequality state (HeqnH (cid,cidn)) ph nh) !neg_hyps; pos_hyps:=(cid,ph):: !pos_hyps | `Nother nh -> List.iter (fun (cidp,ph) -> add_disequality state (HeqnH (cidp,cid)) ph nh) !pos_hyps; neg_hyps:=(cid,nh):: !neg_hyps | `Rule patts -> add_quant state id true patts | `Nrule patts -> add_quant state id false patts end) (Environ.named_context_of_val (Goal.V82.nf_hyps gls.sigma gls.it)); begin match atom_of_constr env sigma (Evarutil.nf_evar sigma (pf_concl gls)) with `Eq (t,a,b) -> add_disequality state Goal a b | `Other g -> List.iter (fun (idp,ph) -> add_disequality state (HeqG idp) ph g) !pos_hyps end; state (* indhyps builds the array of arrays of constructor hyps for (ind largs) *) let build_projection intype (cstr:pconstructor) special default gls= let ci= (snd(fst cstr)) in let body=Equality.build_selector (pf_env gls) (project gls) ci (mkRel 1) intype special default in let id=pf_get_new_id (Id.of_string "t") gls in mkLambda(Name id,intype,body) (* generate an adhoc tactic following the proof tree *) let _M =mkMeta let app_global f args k = Tacticals.pf_constr_of_global (Lazy.force f) (fun fc -> k (mkApp (fc, args))) let new_app_global f args k = Tacticals.New.pf_constr_of_global (Lazy.force f) (fun fc -> k (mkApp (fc, args))) let new_refine c = Proofview.V82.tactic (refine c) let assert_before n c = Proofview.Goal.enter { enter = begin fun gl -> let evm, _ = Tacmach.New.pf_apply type_of gl c in Tacticals.New.tclTHEN (Proofview.V82.tactic (Refiner.tclEVARS evm)) (assert_before n c) end } let refresh_type env evm ty = Evarsolve.refresh_universes ~status:Evd.univ_flexible ~refreshset:true (Some false) env evm ty let refresh_universes ty k = Proofview.Goal.enter { enter = begin fun gl -> let env = Proofview.Goal.env gl in let evm = Tacmach.New.project gl in let evm, ty = refresh_type env evm ty in Tacticals.New.tclTHEN (Proofview.V82.tactic (Refiner.tclEVARS evm)) (k ty) end } let rec proof_tac p : unit Proofview.tactic = Proofview.Goal.nf_enter { enter = begin fun gl -> let type_of t = Tacmach.New.pf_unsafe_type_of gl t in try (* type_of can raise exceptions *) match p.p_rule with Ax c -> exact_check c | SymAx c -> let l=constr_of_term p.p_lhs and r=constr_of_term p.p_rhs in refresh_universes (type_of l) (fun typ -> new_app_global _sym_eq [|typ;r;l;c|] exact_check) | Refl t -> let lr = constr_of_term t in refresh_universes (type_of lr) (fun typ -> new_app_global _refl_equal [|typ;constr_of_term t|] exact_check) | Trans (p1,p2)-> let t1 = constr_of_term p1.p_lhs and t2 = constr_of_term p1.p_rhs and t3 = constr_of_term p2.p_rhs in refresh_universes (type_of t2) (fun typ -> let prf = new_app_global _trans_eq [|typ;t1;t2;t3;_M 1;_M 2|] in Tacticals.New.tclTHENS (prf new_refine) [(proof_tac p1);(proof_tac p2)]) | Congr (p1,p2)-> let tf1=constr_of_term p1.p_lhs and tx1=constr_of_term p2.p_lhs and tf2=constr_of_term p1.p_rhs and tx2=constr_of_term p2.p_rhs in refresh_universes (type_of tf1) (fun typf -> refresh_universes (type_of tx1) (fun typx -> refresh_universes (type_of (mkApp (tf1,[|tx1|]))) (fun typfx -> let id = Tacmach.New.of_old (fun gls -> pf_get_new_id (Id.of_string "f") gls) gl in let appx1 = mkLambda(Name id,typf,mkApp(mkRel 1,[|tx1|])) in let lemma1 = app_global _f_equal [|typf;typfx;appx1;tf1;tf2;_M 1|] in let lemma2 = app_global _f_equal [|typx;typfx;tf2;tx1;tx2;_M 1|] in let prf = app_global _trans_eq [|typfx; mkApp(tf1,[|tx1|]); mkApp(tf2,[|tx1|]); mkApp(tf2,[|tx2|]);_M 2;_M 3|] in Tacticals.New.tclTHENS (Proofview.V82.tactic (prf refine)) [Tacticals.New.tclTHEN (Proofview.V82.tactic (lemma1 refine)) (proof_tac p1); Tacticals.New.tclFIRST [Tacticals.New.tclTHEN (Proofview.V82.tactic (lemma2 refine)) (proof_tac p2); reflexivity; Tacticals.New.tclZEROMSG (Pp.str "I don't know how to handle dependent equality")]]))) | Inject (prf,cstr,nargs,argind) -> let ti=constr_of_term prf.p_lhs in let tj=constr_of_term prf.p_rhs in let default=constr_of_term p.p_lhs in let special=mkRel (1+nargs-argind) in refresh_universes (type_of ti) (fun intype -> refresh_universes (type_of default) (fun outtype -> let proj = Tacmach.New.of_old (build_projection intype cstr special default) gl in let injt= app_global _f_equal [|intype;outtype;proj;ti;tj;_M 1|] in Tacticals.New.tclTHEN (Proofview.V82.tactic (injt refine)) (proof_tac prf))) with e when Proofview.V82.catchable_exception e -> Proofview.tclZERO e end } let refute_tac c t1 t2 p = Proofview.Goal.nf_enter { enter = begin fun gl -> let tt1=constr_of_term t1 and tt2=constr_of_term t2 in let hid = Tacmach.New.of_old (pf_get_new_id (Id.of_string "Heq")) gl in let false_t=mkApp (c,[|mkVar hid|]) in let k intype = let neweq= new_app_global _eq [|intype;tt1;tt2|] in Tacticals.New.tclTHENS (neweq (assert_before (Name hid))) [proof_tac p; simplest_elim false_t] in refresh_universes (Tacmach.New.pf_unsafe_type_of gl tt1) k end } let refine_exact_check c gl = let evm, _ = pf_apply type_of gl c in Tacticals.tclTHEN (Refiner.tclEVARS evm) (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (exact_check c)) gl let convert_to_goal_tac c t1 t2 p = Proofview.Goal.nf_enter { enter = begin fun gl -> let tt1=constr_of_term t1 and tt2=constr_of_term t2 in let k sort = let neweq= new_app_global _eq [|sort;tt1;tt2|] in let e = Tacmach.New.of_old (pf_get_new_id (Id.of_string "e")) gl in let x = Tacmach.New.of_old (pf_get_new_id (Id.of_string "X")) gl in let identity=mkLambda (Name x,sort,mkRel 1) in let endt=app_global _eq_rect [|sort;tt1;identity;c;tt2;mkVar e|] in Tacticals.New.tclTHENS (neweq (assert_before (Name e))) [proof_tac p; Proofview.V82.tactic (endt refine_exact_check)] in refresh_universes (Tacmach.New.pf_unsafe_type_of gl tt2) k end } let convert_to_hyp_tac c1 t1 c2 t2 p = Proofview.Goal.nf_enter { enter = begin fun gl -> let tt2=constr_of_term t2 in let h = Tacmach.New.of_old (pf_get_new_id (Id.of_string "H")) gl in let false_t=mkApp (c2,[|mkVar h|]) in Tacticals.New.tclTHENS (assert_before (Name h) tt2) [convert_to_goal_tac c1 t1 t2 p; simplest_elim false_t] end } let discriminate_tac (cstr,u as cstru) p = Proofview.Goal.nf_enter { enter = begin fun gl -> let t1=constr_of_term p.p_lhs and t2=constr_of_term p.p_rhs in let env = Proofview.Goal.env gl in let concl = Proofview.Goal.concl gl in let xid = Tacmach.New.of_old (pf_get_new_id (Id.of_string "X")) gl in let identity = Universes.constr_of_global (Lazy.force _I) in let trivial = Universes.constr_of_global (Lazy.force _True) in let evm = Tacmach.New.project gl in let evm, intype = refresh_type env evm (Tacmach.New.pf_unsafe_type_of gl t1) in let evm, outtype = Evd.new_sort_variable Evd.univ_flexible evm in let outtype = mkSort outtype in let pred = mkLambda(Name xid,outtype,mkRel 1) in let hid = Tacmach.New.of_old (pf_get_new_id (Id.of_string "Heq")) gl in let proj = Tacmach.New.of_old (build_projection intype cstru trivial concl) gl in let injt=app_global _f_equal [|intype;outtype;proj;t1;t2;mkVar hid|] in let endt k = injt (fun injt -> app_global _eq_rect [|outtype;trivial;pred;identity;concl;injt|] k) in let neweq=new_app_global _eq [|intype;t1;t2|] in Tacticals.New.tclTHEN (Proofview.Unsafe.tclEVARS evm) (Tacticals.New.tclTHENS (neweq (assert_before (Name hid))) [proof_tac p; Proofview.V82.tactic (endt refine_exact_check)]) end } (* wrap everything *) let build_term_to_complete uf meta pac = let cinfo = get_constructor_info uf pac.cnode in let real_args = List.map (fun i -> constr_of_term (term uf i)) pac.args in let dummy_args = List.rev (List.init pac.arity meta) in let all_args = List.rev_append real_args dummy_args in applistc (mkConstructU cinfo.ci_constr) all_args let cc_tactic depth additionnal_terms = Proofview.Goal.nf_enter { enter = begin fun gl -> Coqlib.check_required_library Coqlib.logic_module_name; let _ = debug (fun () -> Pp.str "Reading subgoal ...") in let state = Tacmach.New.of_old (fun gls -> make_prb gls depth additionnal_terms) gl in let _ = debug (fun () -> Pp.str "Problem built, solving ...") in let sol = execute true state in let _ = debug (fun () -> Pp.str "Computation completed.") in let uf=forest state in match sol with None -> Tacticals.New.tclFAIL 0 (str "congruence failed") | Some reason -> debug (fun () -> Pp.str "Goal solved, generating proof ..."); match reason with Discrimination (i,ipac,j,jpac) -> let p=build_proof uf (`Discr (i,ipac,j,jpac)) in let cstr=(get_constructor_info uf ipac.cnode).ci_constr in discriminate_tac cstr p | Incomplete -> let env = Proofview.Goal.env gl in let metacnt = ref 0 in let newmeta _ = incr metacnt; _M !metacnt in let terms_to_complete = List.map (build_term_to_complete uf newmeta) (epsilons uf) in Feedback.msg_info (Pp.str "Goal is solvable by congruence but \ some arguments are missing."); Feedback.msg_info (Pp.str " Try " ++ hov 8 begin str "\"congruence with (" ++ prlist_with_sep (fun () -> str ")" ++ spc () ++ str "(") (Termops.print_constr_env env) terms_to_complete ++ str ")\"," end ++ Pp.str " replacing metavariables by arbitrary terms."); Tacticals.New.tclFAIL 0 (str "Incomplete") | Contradiction dis -> let p=build_proof uf (`Prove (dis.lhs,dis.rhs)) in let ta=term uf dis.lhs and tb=term uf dis.rhs in match dis.rule with Goal -> proof_tac p | Hyp id -> refute_tac id ta tb p | HeqG id -> convert_to_goal_tac id ta tb p | HeqnH (ida,idb) -> convert_to_hyp_tac ida ta idb tb p end } let cc_fail gls = errorlabstrm "Congruence" (Pp.str "congruence failed.") let congruence_tac depth l = Tacticals.New.tclORELSE (Tacticals.New.tclTHEN (Tacticals.New.tclREPEAT introf) (cc_tactic depth l)) (Proofview.V82.tactic cc_fail) (* Beware: reflexivity = constructor 1 = apply refl_equal might be slow now, let's rather do something equivalent to a "simple apply refl_equal" *) (* The [f_equal] tactic. It mimics the use of lemmas [f_equal], [f_equal2], etc. This isn't particularly related with congruence, apart from the fact that congruence is called internally. *) let mk_eq f c1 c2 k = Tacticals.New.pf_constr_of_global (Lazy.force f) (fun fc -> Proofview.Goal.enter { enter = begin fun gl -> let open Tacmach.New in let evm, ty = pf_apply type_of gl c1 in let evm, ty = Evarsolve.refresh_universes (Some false) (pf_env gl) evm ty in let term = mkApp (fc, [| ty; c1; c2 |]) in let evm, _ = type_of (pf_env gl) evm term in Tacticals.New.tclTHEN (Proofview.V82.tactic (Refiner.tclEVARS evm)) (k term) end }) let f_equal = Proofview.Goal.nf_enter { enter = begin fun gl -> let concl = Proofview.Goal.concl gl in let cut_eq c1 c2 = try (* type_of can raise an exception *) Tacticals.New.tclTHENS (mk_eq _eq c1 c2 Tactics.cut) [Proofview.tclUNIT ();Tacticals.New.tclTRY ((new_app_global _refl_equal [||]) apply)] with e when Proofview.V82.catchable_exception e -> Proofview.tclZERO e in Proofview.tclORELSE begin match kind_of_term concl with | App (r,[|_;t;t'|]) when Globnames.is_global (Lazy.force _eq) r -> begin match kind_of_term t, kind_of_term t' with | App (f,v), App (f',v') when Int.equal (Array.length v) (Array.length v') -> let rec cuts i = if i < 0 then Tacticals.New.tclTRY (congruence_tac 1000 []) else Tacticals.New.tclTHENFIRST (cut_eq v.(i) v'.(i)) (cuts (i-1)) in cuts (Array.length v - 1) | _ -> Proofview.tclUNIT () end | _ -> Proofview.tclUNIT () end begin function (e, info) -> match e with | Type_errors.TypeError _ -> Proofview.tclUNIT () | e -> Proofview.tclZERO ~info e end end }