From 164c6861860e6b52818c031f901ffeff91fca16a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Enrico Tassi <gareuselesinge@debian.org>
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 16:56:33 +0100
Subject: Imported Upstream version 8.5

---
 theories/Logic/ClassicalFacts.v | 7 +++----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

(limited to 'theories/Logic/ClassicalFacts.v')

diff --git a/theories/Logic/ClassicalFacts.v b/theories/Logic/ClassicalFacts.v
index 6f736e45..c947062a 100644
--- a/theories/Logic/ClassicalFacts.v
+++ b/theories/Logic/ClassicalFacts.v
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 (* -*- coding: utf-8 -*- *)
 (************************************************************************)
 (*  v      *   The Coq Proof Assistant  /  The Coq Development Team     *)
-(* <O___,, *   INRIA - CNRS - LIX - LRI - PPS - Copyright 1999-2015     *)
+(* <O___,, *   INRIA - CNRS - LIX - LRI - PPS - Copyright 1999-2016     *)
 (*   \VV/  **************************************************************)
 (*    //   *      This file is distributed under the terms of the       *)
 (*         *       GNU Lesser General Public License Version 2.1        *)
@@ -442,10 +442,10 @@ Section Proof_irrelevance_WEM_CC.
   Theorem wproof_irrelevance_cc : ~~(b1 = b2).
   Proof.
     intros h.
-    refine (let NB := exist (fun P=>~~P -> P) B _ in _).
+    unshelve (refine (let NB := exist (fun P=>~~P -> P) B _ in _)).
     { exact (fun _ => b1). }
     pose proof (NoRetractToNegativeProp.paradox NB p2b b2p (wp2p2 h) wp2p1) as paradox.
-    refine (let F := exist (fun P=>~~P->P) False _ in _).
+    unshelve (refine (let F := exist (fun P=>~~P->P) False _ in _)).
     { auto. }
     exact (paradox F).
   Qed.
@@ -658,4 +658,3 @@ Proof.
     exists x; intro; exact Hx.
     exists x0; exact Hnot.
 Qed.
-
-- 
cgit v1.2.3