From de0085539583f59dc7c4bf4e272e18711d565466 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Samuel Mimram Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 14:28:31 +0000 Subject: Imported Upstream version 8.0pl3+8.1beta.2 --- test-suite/failure/inductive1.v | 4 ++ test-suite/failure/inductive2.v | 4 ++ test-suite/failure/inductive3.v | 5 +++ test-suite/success/CanonicalStructure.v | 7 ++++ test-suite/success/Case18.v | 11 ++++-- test-suite/success/Case19.v | 8 ++++ test-suite/success/Funind.v | 70 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- 7 files changed, 97 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) create mode 100644 test-suite/failure/inductive1.v create mode 100644 test-suite/failure/inductive2.v create mode 100644 test-suite/failure/inductive3.v create mode 100644 test-suite/success/CanonicalStructure.v create mode 100644 test-suite/success/Case19.v (limited to 'test-suite') diff --git a/test-suite/failure/inductive1.v b/test-suite/failure/inductive1.v new file mode 100644 index 00000000..3b57d919 --- /dev/null +++ b/test-suite/failure/inductive1.v @@ -0,0 +1,4 @@ +(* A check that sort-polymorphic product is not set too low *) + +Inductive prod (A B:Type) : Type := pair : A -> B -> prod A B. +Check (fun (A:Type) (B:Prop) => (prod A B : Prop)). diff --git a/test-suite/failure/inductive2.v b/test-suite/failure/inductive2.v new file mode 100644 index 00000000..b77474be --- /dev/null +++ b/test-suite/failure/inductive2.v @@ -0,0 +1,4 @@ +(* A check that sort-polymorphic product is not set too low *) + +Inductive prod (A B:Type) : Type := pair : A -> B -> prod A B. +Check (fun (A:Prop) (B:Type) => (prod A B : Prop)). diff --git a/test-suite/failure/inductive3.v b/test-suite/failure/inductive3.v new file mode 100644 index 00000000..e5a4e1b6 --- /dev/null +++ b/test-suite/failure/inductive3.v @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ +(* Check that the nested inductive types positivity check avoids recursively + non uniform parameters (at least if these parameters break positivity) *) + +Inductive t (A:Type) : Type := c : t (A -> A) -> t A. +Inductive u : Type := d : u | e : t u -> u. diff --git a/test-suite/success/CanonicalStructure.v b/test-suite/success/CanonicalStructure.v new file mode 100644 index 00000000..003810cc --- /dev/null +++ b/test-suite/success/CanonicalStructure.v @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ +(* Bug #1172 *) + +Structure foo : Type := Foo { + A : Set; Aopt := option A; unopt : Aopt -> A +}. + +Canonical Structure unopt_nat := @Foo nat (fun _ => O). diff --git a/test-suite/success/Case18.v b/test-suite/success/Case18.v index a57fe413..91c80e88 100644 --- a/test-suite/success/Case18.v +++ b/test-suite/success/Case18.v @@ -3,9 +3,12 @@ Definition g x := match x with ((((1 as x),_) | (_,x)), (_,(2 as y))|(y,_)) => (x,y) end. -Eval compute in (g ((1,2),(3,4))). -(* (1,3) *) +Check (refl_equal _ : g ((1,2),(3,4)) = (1,3)). -Eval compute in (g ((1,4),(3,2))). -(* (1,2) *) +Check (refl_equal _ : g ((1,4),(3,2)) = (1,2)). +Fixpoint max (n m:nat) {struct m} : nat := + match n, m with + | S n', S m' => S (max n' m') + | 0, p | p, 0 => p + end. diff --git a/test-suite/success/Case19.v b/test-suite/success/Case19.v new file mode 100644 index 00000000..9a6ed71a --- /dev/null +++ b/test-suite/success/Case19.v @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ +(* This used to fail in Coq version 8.1 beta due to a non variable + universe (issued by the inductive sort-polymorphism) being sent by + pretyping to the kernel (bug #1182) *) + +Variable T : Type. +Variable x : nat*nat. + +Check let (_, _) := x in sigT (fun _ : T => nat). diff --git a/test-suite/success/Funind.v b/test-suite/success/Funind.v index 939d06c7..1c3e56f2 100644 --- a/test-suite/success/Funind.v +++ b/test-suite/success/Funind.v @@ -29,6 +29,18 @@ intros n m. functional induction ftest n m; auto. Qed. +Lemma test2 : forall m n, ~ 2 = ftest n m. +Proof. +intros n m;intro H. +functional inversion H ftest. +Qed. + +Lemma test3 : forall n m, ftest n m = 0 -> (n = 0 /\ m = 0) \/ n <> 0. +Proof. +functional inversion 1 ftest;auto. +Qed. + + Require Import Arith. Lemma test11 : forall m : nat, ftest 0 m <= 2. intros m. @@ -112,7 +124,8 @@ Function iseven (n : nat) : bool := | S (S m) => iseven m | _ => false end. - + + Function funex (n : nat) : nat := match iseven n with | true => n @@ -122,6 +135,7 @@ Function funex (n : nat) : nat := end end. + Function nat_equal_bool (n m : nat) {struct n} : bool := match n with | O => match m with @@ -151,7 +165,6 @@ Qed. (* reuse this lemma as a scheme:*) - Function nested_lam (n : nat) : nat -> nat := match n with | O => fun m : nat => 0 @@ -184,7 +197,6 @@ auto with arith. auto with arith. Qed. - Function plus_x_not_five'' (n m : nat) {struct n} : nat := let x := nat_equal_bool m 5 in let y := 0 in @@ -206,7 +218,7 @@ Qed. Lemma iseq_eq : forall n m : nat, n = m -> nat_equal_bool n m = true. intros n m. functional induction nat_equal_bool n m; simpl in |- *; intros hyp; auto. -rewrite <- hyp in H1; simpl in H1;tauto. +rewrite <- hyp in y; simpl in y;tauto. inversion hyp. Qed. @@ -280,14 +292,14 @@ destruct n. tauto. destruct n. inversion istr. destruct n. inversion istr. destruct n. tauto. -simpl in *. inversion H1. +simpl in *. inversion H0. Qed. Lemma toto' : forall n m : nat, n = 4 -> istrue (isononeorfour n). intros n. functional induction isononeorfour n; intros m istr; inversion istr. apply istrue0. -rewrite H in H0; simpl in H0;tauto. +rewrite H in y; simpl in y;tauto. Qed. Function ftest4 (n m : nat) : nat := @@ -353,7 +365,7 @@ Function ftest2 (n m : nat) {struct n} : nat := | S p => ftest2 p m end. -Lemma test2 : forall n m : nat, ftest2 n m <= 2. +Lemma test2' : forall n m : nat, ftest2 n m <= 2. intros n m. functional induction ftest2 n m; simpl in |- *; intros; auto. Qed. @@ -367,7 +379,7 @@ Function ftest3 (n m : nat) {struct n} : nat := end end. -Lemma test3 : forall n m : nat, ftest3 n m <= 2. +Lemma test3' : forall n m : nat, ftest3 n m <= 2. intros n m. functional induction ftest3 n m. intros. @@ -442,10 +454,52 @@ intros n m. functional induction ftest6 n m; simpl in |- *; auto. Qed. +(* Some tests with modules *) +Module M. +Function test_m (n:nat) : nat := + match n with + | 0 => 0 + | S n => S (S (test_m n)) + end. +Lemma test_m_is_double : forall n, div2 (test_m n) = n. +Proof. +intros n. +functional induction (test_m n). +reflexivity. +simpl;rewrite IHn0;reflexivity. +Qed. +End M. +(* We redefine a new Function with the same name *) +Function test_m (n:nat) : nat := + pred n. + +Lemma test_m_is_pred : forall n, test_m n = pred n. +Proof. +intro n. +functional induction (test_m n). (* the test_m_ind to use is the last defined saying that test_m = pred*) +reflexivity. +Qed. +(* Checks if the dot notation are correctly treated in infos *) +Lemma M_test_m_is_double : forall n, div2 (M.test_m n) = n. +intro n. +(* here we should apply M.test_m_ind *) +functional induction (M.test_m n). +reflexivity. +simpl;rewrite IHn0;reflexivity. +Qed. +Import M. +(* Now test_m is the one which defines double *) +Lemma test_m_is_double : forall n, div2 (M.test_m n) = n. +intro n. +(* here we should apply M.test_m_ind *) +functional induction (test_m n). +reflexivity. +simpl;rewrite IHn0;reflexivity. +Qed. -- cgit v1.2.3