From 9ebf44d84754adc5b64fcf612c6816c02c80462d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Benjamin Barenblat Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2019 19:29:23 -0500 Subject: Imported Upstream version 8.9.0 --- test-suite/misc/7595/FOO.v | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+) create mode 100644 test-suite/misc/7595/FOO.v (limited to 'test-suite/misc/7595/FOO.v') diff --git a/test-suite/misc/7595/FOO.v b/test-suite/misc/7595/FOO.v new file mode 100644 index 00000000..30c957d3 --- /dev/null +++ b/test-suite/misc/7595/FOO.v @@ -0,0 +1,39 @@ +Require Import Test.base. + +Lemma dec_stable `{Decision P} : ¬¬P → P. +Proof. firstorder. Qed. + +(** The tactic [destruct_decide] destructs a sumbool [dec]. If one of the +components is double negated, it will try to remove the double negation. *) +Tactic Notation "destruct_decide" constr(dec) "as" ident(H) := + destruct dec as [H|H]; + try match type of H with + | ¬¬_ => apply dec_stable in H + end. +Tactic Notation "destruct_decide" constr(dec) := + let H := fresh in destruct_decide dec as H. + + +(** * Monadic operations *) +Instance option_guard: MGuard option := λ P dec A f, + match dec with left H => f H | _ => None end. + +(** * Tactics *) +Tactic Notation "case_option_guard" "as" ident(Hx) := + match goal with + | H : context C [@mguard option _ ?P ?dec] |- _ => + change (@mguard option _ P dec) with (λ A (f : P → option A), + match @decide P dec with left H' => f H' | _ => None end) in *; + destruct_decide (@decide P dec) as Hx + | |- context C [@mguard option _ ?P ?dec] => + change (@mguard option _ P dec) with (λ A (f : P → option A), + match @decide P dec with left H' => f H' | _ => None end) in *; + destruct_decide (@decide P dec) as Hx + end. +Tactic Notation "case_option_guard" := + let H := fresh in case_option_guard as H. + +(* This proof failed depending on the name of the module. *) +Lemma option_guard_True {A} P `{Decision P} (mx : option A) : + P → (guard P; mx) = mx. +Proof. intros. case_option_guard. reflexivity. contradiction. Qed. -- cgit v1.2.3