From a4c7f8bd98be2a200489325ff7c5061cf80ab4f3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Enrico Tassi Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2016 16:53:30 +0100 Subject: Imported Upstream version 8.6 --- test-suite/bugs/closed/5123.v | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+) create mode 100644 test-suite/bugs/closed/5123.v (limited to 'test-suite/bugs/closed/5123.v') diff --git a/test-suite/bugs/closed/5123.v b/test-suite/bugs/closed/5123.v new file mode 100644 index 00000000..bcde510e --- /dev/null +++ b/test-suite/bugs/closed/5123.v @@ -0,0 +1,33 @@ +(* IN 8.5pl2 and 8.6 (4da2131), the following shows different typeclass resolution behaviors following an unshelve tactical vs. an Unshelve command: *) + +(*Pose an open constr to prevent immediate typeclass resolution in holes:*) +Tactic Notation "opose" open_constr(x) "as" ident(H) := pose x as H. + +Inductive vect A : nat -> Type := +| vnil : vect A 0 +| vcons : forall (h:A) (n:nat), vect A n -> vect A (S n). + +Class Eqdec A := eqdec : forall a b : A, {a=b}+{a<>b}. + +Require Bool. + +Instance Bool_eqdec : Eqdec bool := Bool.bool_dec. + +Context `{vect_sigT_eqdec : forall A : Type, Eqdec A -> Eqdec {a : nat & vect A a}}. + +Typeclasses eauto := debug. + +Goal True. + unshelve opose (@vect_sigT_eqdec _ _ _ _) as H. + all:cycle 2. + eapply existT. (*BUG: Why does this do typeclass resolution in the evar?*) + Focus 5. +Abort. + +Goal True. + opose (@vect_sigT_eqdec _ _ _ _) as H. + Unshelve. + all:cycle 3. + eapply existT. (*This does no typeclass resultion, which is correct.*) + Focus 5. +Abort. \ No newline at end of file -- cgit v1.2.3