From f18e6146f4fd6ed5b8ded10a3e602f5f64f919f4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Stephane Glondu Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2010 16:15:08 -0400 Subject: Imported Upstream version 8.3~rc1+dfsg --- plugins/nsatz/NsatzR.v | 407 ------------------------------------------------- 1 file changed, 407 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 plugins/nsatz/NsatzR.v (limited to 'plugins/nsatz/NsatzR.v') diff --git a/plugins/nsatz/NsatzR.v b/plugins/nsatz/NsatzR.v deleted file mode 100644 index 41e02c76..00000000 --- a/plugins/nsatz/NsatzR.v +++ /dev/null @@ -1,407 +0,0 @@ -(************************************************************************) -(* v * The Coq Proof Assistant / The Coq Development Team *) -(* x = y. -intros x y H; replace x with ((x - y) + y); - [rewrite H | idtac]; ring. -Qed. - -Lemma psos_r1: forall x y, x = y -> x - y = 0. -intros x y H; rewrite H; ring. -Qed. - -Lemma nsatzR_not1: forall x y:R, x<>y -> exists z:R, z*(x-y)-1=0. -intros. -exists (1/(x-y)). -field. -unfold not. -unfold not in H. -intros. -apply H. -replace x with ((x-y)+y). -rewrite H0. -ring. -ring. -Qed. - -Lemma nsatzR_not1_0: forall x:R, x<>0 -> exists z:R, z*x-1=0. -intros. -exists (1/(x)). -field. -auto. -Qed. - - -Ltac equalities_to_goal := - lazymatch goal with - | H: (@eq R ?x 0) |- _ => try revert H - | H: (@eq R 0 ?x) |- _ => - try generalize (sym_equal H); clear H - | H: (@eq R ?x ?y) |- _ => - try generalize (psos_r1 _ _ H); clear H - end. - -Lemma nsatzR_not2: 1<>0. -auto with *. -Qed. - -Lemma nsatzR_diff: forall x y:R, x<>y -> x-y<>0. -intros. -intro; apply H. -replace x with (x-y+y) by ring. -rewrite H0; ring. -Qed. - -(* Removes x<>0 from hypothesis *) -Ltac nsatzR_not_hyp:= - match goal with - | H: ?x<>?y |- _ => - match y with - |0 => - let H1:=fresh "Hnsatz" in - let y:=fresh "x" in - destruct (@nsatzR_not1_0 _ H) as (y,H1); clear H - |_ => generalize (@nsatzR_diff _ _ H); clear H; intro - end - end. - -Ltac nsatzR_not_goal := - match goal with - | |- ?x<>?y :> R => red; intro; apply nsatzR_not2 - | |- False => apply nsatzR_not2 - end. - -Ltac nsatzR_begin := - intros; - repeat nsatzR_not_hyp; - try nsatzR_not_goal; - try apply psos_r1b; - repeat equalities_to_goal. - -(* code de Benjamin *) - -Definition PolZ := Pol Z. -Definition PEZ := PExpr Z. - -Definition P0Z : PolZ := @P0 Z 0%Z. - -Definition PolZadd : PolZ -> PolZ -> PolZ := - @Padd Z 0%Z Zplus Zeq_bool. - -Definition PolZmul : PolZ -> PolZ -> PolZ := - @Pmul Z 0%Z 1%Z Zplus Zmult Zeq_bool. - -Definition PolZeq := @Peq Z Zeq_bool. - -Definition norm := - @norm_aux Z 0%Z 1%Z Zplus Zmult Zminus Zopp Zeq_bool. - -Fixpoint mult_l (la : list PEZ) (lp: list PolZ) : PolZ := - match la, lp with - | a::la, p::lp => PolZadd (PolZmul (norm a) p) (mult_l la lp) - | _, _ => P0Z - end. - -Fixpoint compute_list (lla: list (list PEZ)) (lp:list PolZ) := - match lla with - | List.nil => lp - | la::lla => compute_list lla ((mult_l la lp)::lp) - end. - -Definition check (lpe:list PEZ) (qe:PEZ) (certif: list (list PEZ) * list PEZ) := - let (lla, lq) := certif in - let lp := List.map norm lpe in - PolZeq (norm qe) (mult_l lq (compute_list lla lp)). - - -(* Correction *) -Definition PhiR : list R -> PolZ -> R := - (Pphi 0 Rplus Rmult (gen_phiZ 0 1 Rplus Rmult Ropp)). - -Definition PEevalR : list R -> PEZ -> R := - PEeval 0 Rplus Rmult Rminus Ropp (gen_phiZ 0 1 Rplus Rmult Ropp) - Nnat.nat_of_N pow. - -Lemma P0Z_correct : forall l, PhiR l P0Z = 0. -Proof. trivial. Qed. - - -Lemma PolZadd_correct : forall P' P l, - PhiR l (PolZadd P P') = (PhiR l P + PhiR l P'). -Proof. - refine (Padd_ok Rset Rext (Rth_ARth Rset Rext (F_R Rfield)) - (gen_phiZ_morph Rset Rext (F_R Rfield))). -Qed. - -Lemma PolZmul_correct : forall P P' l, - PhiR l (PolZmul P P') = (PhiR l P * PhiR l P'). -Proof. - refine (Pmul_ok Rset Rext (Rth_ARth Rset Rext (F_R Rfield)) - (gen_phiZ_morph Rset Rext (F_R Rfield))). -Qed. - -Lemma norm_correct : - forall (l : list R) (pe : PEZ), PEevalR l pe = PhiR l (norm pe). -Proof. - intros;apply (norm_aux_spec Rset Rext (Rth_ARth Rset Rext (F_R Rfield)) - (gen_phiZ_morph Rset Rext (F_R Rfield)) R_power_theory) with (lmp:= List.nil). - compute;trivial. -Qed. - -Lemma PolZeq_correct : forall P P' l, - PolZeq P P' = true -> - PhiR l P = PhiR l P'. -Proof. - intros;apply - (Peq_ok Rset Rext (gen_phiZ_morph Rset Rext (F_R Rfield)));trivial. -Qed. - -Fixpoint Cond0 (A:Type) (Interp:A->R) (l:list A) : Prop := - match l with - | List.nil => True - | a::l => Interp a = 0 /\ Cond0 A Interp l - end. - -Lemma mult_l_correct : forall l la lp, - Cond0 PolZ (PhiR l) lp -> - PhiR l (mult_l la lp) = 0. -Proof. - induction la;simpl;intros;trivial. - destruct lp;trivial. - simpl in H;destruct H. - rewrite PolZadd_correct, PolZmul_correct, H, IHla;[ring | trivial]. -Qed. - -Lemma compute_list_correct : forall l lla lp, - Cond0 PolZ (PhiR l) lp -> - Cond0 PolZ (PhiR l) (compute_list lla lp). -Proof. - induction lla;simpl;intros;trivial. - apply IHlla;simpl;split;trivial. - apply mult_l_correct;trivial. -Qed. - -Lemma check_correct : - forall l lpe qe certif, - check lpe qe certif = true -> - Cond0 PEZ (PEevalR l) lpe -> - PEevalR l qe = 0. -Proof. - unfold check;intros l lpe qe (lla, lq) H2 H1. - apply PolZeq_correct with (l:=l) in H2. - rewrite norm_correct, H2. - apply mult_l_correct. - apply compute_list_correct. - clear H2 lq lla qe;induction lpe;simpl;trivial. - simpl in H1;destruct H1. - rewrite <- norm_correct;auto. -Qed. - -(* fin du code de Benjamin *) - -Lemma nsatzR_l3:forall c p r, ~c=0 -> c*p^r=0 -> p=0. -intros. -elim (Rmult_integral _ _ H0);intros. - absurd (c=0);auto. - - clear H0; induction r; simpl in *. - contradict H1; discrR. - - elim (Rmult_integral _ _ H1); auto. -Qed. - - -Ltac generalise_eq_hyps:= - repeat - (match goal with - |h : (?p = ?q)|- _ => revert h - end). - -Ltac lpol_goal t := - match t with - | ?a = 0 -> ?b => - let r:= lpol_goal b in - constr:(a::r) - | ?a = 0 => constr:(a::nil) - end. - -Fixpoint IPR p {struct p}: R := - match p with - xH => 1 - | xO xH => 1 + 1 - | xO p1 => 2 * (IPR p1) - | xI xH => 1 + (1 + 1) - | xI p1 => 1 + 2 * (IPR p1) - end. - -Definition IZR1 z := - match z with Z0 => 0 - | Zpos p => IPR p - | Zneg p => -(IPR p) - end. - -Fixpoint interpret3 t fv {struct t}: R := - match t with - | (PEadd t1 t2) => - let v1 := interpret3 t1 fv in - let v2 := interpret3 t2 fv in (v1 + v2) - | (PEmul t1 t2) => - let v1 := interpret3 t1 fv in - let v2 := interpret3 t2 fv in (v1 * v2) - | (PEsub t1 t2) => - let v1 := interpret3 t1 fv in - let v2 := interpret3 t2 fv in (v1 - v2) - | (PEopp t1) => - let v1 := interpret3 t1 fv in (-v1) - | (PEpow t1 t2) => - let v1 := interpret3 t1 fv in v1 ^(Nnat.nat_of_N t2) - | (PEc t1) => (IZR1 t1) - | (PEX n) => List.nth (pred (nat_of_P n)) fv 0 - end. - -(* lp est incluse dans fv. La met en tete. *) - -Ltac parametres_en_tete fv lp := - match fv with - | (@nil _) => lp - | (@cons _ ?x ?fv1) => - let res := AddFvTail x lp in - parametres_en_tete fv1 res - end. - -Ltac append1 a l := - match l with - | (@nil _) => constr:(cons a l) - | (cons ?x ?l) => let l' := append1 a l in constr:(cons x l') - end. - -Ltac rev l := - match l with - |(@nil _) => l - | (cons ?x ?l) => let l' := rev l in append1 x l' - end. - - -Ltac nsatz_call_n info nparam p rr lp kont := - nsatz_compute (PEc info :: PEc nparam :: PEpow p rr :: lp); - match goal with - | |- (?c::PEpow _ ?r::?lq0)::?lci0 = _ -> _ => - intros _; - set (lci:=lci0); - set (lq:=lq0); - kont c rr lq lci - end. - -Ltac nsatz_call radicalmax info nparam p lp kont := - let rec try_n n := - lazymatch n with - | 0%N => fail - | _ => -(* idtac "Trying power: " n;*) - (let r := eval compute in (Nminus radicalmax (Npred n)) in - nsatz_call_n info nparam p r lp kont) || - let n' := eval compute in (Npred n) in try_n n' - end in - try_n radicalmax. - - -Ltac nsatzR_gen radicalmax info lparam lvar n RNG lH _rl := - get_Pre RNG (); - let mkFV := Ring_tac.get_RingFV RNG in - let mkPol := Ring_tac.get_RingMeta RNG in - generalise_eq_hyps; - let t := Get_goal in - let lpol := lpol_goal t in - intros; - let fv := - match lvar with - | nil => - let fv1 := FV_hypo_tac mkFV ltac:(get_Eq RNG) lH in - let fv1 := list_fold_right mkFV fv1 lpol in - rev fv1 - (* heuristique: les dernieres variables auront le poid le plus fort *) - | _ => lvar - end in - check_fv fv; - (*idtac "variables:";idtac fv;*) - let nparam := eval compute in (Z_of_nat (List.length lparam)) in - let fv := parametres_en_tete fv lparam in - idtac "variables:"; idtac fv; - (* idtac "nparam:"; idtac nparam;*) - let lpol := list_fold_right - ltac:(fun p l => let p' := mkPol p fv in constr:(p'::l)) - (@nil (PExpr Z)) - lpol in - let lpol := eval compute in (List.rev lpol) in - (*idtac lpol;*) - let SplitPolyList kont := - match lpol with - | ?p2::?lp2 => kont p2 lp2 - | _ => idtac "polynomial not in the ideal" - end in - SplitPolyList ltac:(fun p lp => - set (p21:=p) ; - set (lp21:=lp); - nsatz_call radicalmax info nparam p lp ltac:(fun c r lq lci => - set (q := PEmul c (PEpow p21 r)); - let Hg := fresh "Hg" in - assert (Hg:check lp21 q (lci,lq) = true); - [ (vm_compute;reflexivity) || idtac "invalid nsatz certificate" - | let Hg2 := fresh "Hg" in - assert (Hg2: interpret3 q fv = 0); - [ simpl; apply (@check_correct fv lp21 q (lci,lq) Hg); simpl; - repeat (split;[assumption|idtac]); exact I - | simpl in Hg2; simpl; - apply nsatzR_l3 with (interpret3 c fv) (Nnat.nat_of_N r);simpl; - [ discrR || idtac "could not prove discrimination result" - | exact Hg2] - ] - ])). - -Ltac nsatzRpv radicalmax info lparam lvar:= - nsatzR_begin; - intros; - let G := Get_goal in - ring_lookup - (PackRing ltac:(nsatzR_gen radicalmax info lparam lvar ring_subst_niter)) - [] G. - -Ltac nsatzR := nsatzRpv 6%N 1%Z (@nil R) (@nil R). -Ltac nsatzRradical radicalmax := nsatzRpv radicalmax 1%Z (@nil R) (@nil R). -Ltac nsatzRparameters lparam := nsatzRpv 6%N 1%Z lparam (@nil R). - -Tactic Notation "nsatz" := nsatzR. -Tactic Notation "nsatz" "with" "lexico" := - nsatzRpv 6%N 2%Z (@nil R) (@nil R). -Tactic Notation "nsatz" "with" "lexico" "sugar":= - nsatzRpv 6%N 3%Z (@nil R) (@nil R). -Tactic Notation "nsatz" "without" "sugar":= - nsatzRpv 6%N 0%Z (@nil R) (@nil R). - - -- cgit v1.2.3