From 9043add656177eeac1491a73d2f3ab92bec0013c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Benjamin Barenblat <bbaren@debian.org>
Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2018 14:31:27 -0500
Subject: Imported Upstream version 8.8.2

---
 plugins/ltac/profile_ltac.mli | 84 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 84 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 plugins/ltac/profile_ltac.mli

(limited to 'plugins/ltac/profile_ltac.mli')

diff --git a/plugins/ltac/profile_ltac.mli b/plugins/ltac/profile_ltac.mli
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..6a67aab5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/plugins/ltac/profile_ltac.mli
@@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
+(************************************************************************)
+(*         *   The Coq Proof Assistant / The Coq Development Team       *)
+(*  v      *   INRIA, CNRS and contributors - Copyright 1999-2018       *)
+(* <O___,, *       (see CREDITS file for the list of authors)           *)
+(*   \VV/  **************************************************************)
+(*    //   *    This file is distributed under the terms of the         *)
+(*         *     GNU Lesser General Public License Version 2.1          *)
+(*         *     (see LICENSE file for the text of the license)         *)
+(************************************************************************)
+
+
+(** Ltac profiling primitives *)
+
+(* Note(JasonGross): Ltac semantics are a bit insane.  There isn't
+   really a good notion of how many times a tactic has been "called",
+   because tactics can be partially evaluated, and it's unclear
+   whether the number of "calls" should be the number of times the
+   body is fetched and unfolded, or the number of times the code is
+   executed to a value, etc.  The logic in [Tacinterp.eval_tactic]
+   gives a decent approximation, which I believe roughly corresponds
+   to the number of times that the engine runs the tactic value which
+   results from evaluating the tactic expression bound to the name
+   we're considering.  However, this is a poor approximation of the
+   time spent in the tactic; we want to consider time spent evaluating
+   a tactic expression to a tactic value to be time spent in the
+   expression, not just time spent in the caller of the expression.
+   So we need to wrap some nodes in additional profiling calls which
+   don't count towards to total call count.  Whether or not a call
+   "counts" is indicated by the [count_call] boolean argument.
+
+   Unfortunately, at present, we can get very strange call graphs when
+   a named tactic expression never runs as a tactic value: if we have
+   [Ltac t0 := t.] and [Ltac t1 := t0.], then [t1] is considered to
+   run 0(!) times.  It evaluates to [t] during tactic expression
+   evaluation, and although the call trace records the fact that it
+   was called by [t0] which was called by [t1], the tactic running
+   phase never sees this.  Thus we get one call tree (from expression
+   evaluation) that has [t1] calls [t0] calls [t], and another call
+   tree which says that the caller of [t1] calls [t] directly; the
+   expression evaluation time goes in the first tree, and the call
+   count and tactic running time goes in the second tree.  Alas, I
+   suspect that fixing this requires a redesign of how the profiler
+   hooks into the tactic engine. *)
+val do_profile :
+  string -> ('a * Tacexpr.ltac_call_kind) list ->
+    ?count_call:bool -> 'b Proofview.tactic -> 'b Proofview.tactic
+
+val set_profiling : bool -> unit
+
+(* Cut off results < than specified cutoff *)
+val print_results : cutoff:float -> unit
+
+val print_results_tactic : string -> unit
+
+val reset_profile : unit -> unit
+
+val restart_timer : string option -> unit
+
+val finish_timing : prefix:string -> string option -> unit
+
+val do_print_results_at_close : unit -> unit
+
+(* The collected statistics for a tactic. The timing data is collected over all
+ * instances of a given tactic from its parent. E.g. if tactic 'aaa' calls
+ * 'foo' twice, then 'aaa' will contain just one entry for 'foo' with the
+ * statistics of the two invocations combined, and also combined over all
+ * invocations of 'aaa'.
+ * total:     time spent running this tactic and its subtactics (seconds)
+ * local:      time spent running this tactic, minus its subtactics (seconds)
+ * ncalls: the number of invocations of this tactic that have been made
+ * max_total: the greatest running time of a single invocation (seconds)
+ *)
+type treenode = {
+  name : CString.Map.key;
+  total : float;
+  local : float;
+  ncalls : int;
+  max_total : float;
+  children : treenode CString.Map.t
+}
+
+(* Returns the profiling results known by the current process *)
+val get_local_profiling_results : unit -> treenode
+val feedback_results : treenode -> unit
-- 
cgit v1.2.3