summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/theories7/ZArith/Zcomplements.v
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'theories7/ZArith/Zcomplements.v')
-rw-r--r--theories7/ZArith/Zcomplements.v212
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 212 deletions
diff --git a/theories7/ZArith/Zcomplements.v b/theories7/ZArith/Zcomplements.v
deleted file mode 100644
index 72d837b6..00000000
--- a/theories7/ZArith/Zcomplements.v
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,212 +0,0 @@
-(************************************************************************)
-(* v * The Coq Proof Assistant / The Coq Development Team *)
-(* <O___,, * CNRS-Ecole Polytechnique-INRIA Futurs-Universite Paris Sud *)
-(* \VV/ **************************************************************)
-(* // * This file is distributed under the terms of the *)
-(* * GNU Lesser General Public License Version 2.1 *)
-(************************************************************************)
-
-(*i $Id: Zcomplements.v,v 1.1.2.1 2004/07/16 19:31:43 herbelin Exp $ i*)
-
-Require ZArithRing.
-Require ZArith_base.
-Require Omega.
-Require Wf_nat.
-V7only [Import Z_scope.].
-Open Local Scope Z_scope.
-
-V7only [Set Implicit Arguments.].
-
-(**********************************************************************)
-(** About parity *)
-
-Lemma two_or_two_plus_one : (x:Z) { y:Z | `x = 2*y`}+{ y:Z | `x = 2*y+1`}.
-Proof.
-Intro x; NewDestruct x.
-Left ; Split with ZERO; Reflexivity.
-
-NewDestruct p.
-Right ; Split with (POS p); Reflexivity.
-
-Left ; Split with (POS p); Reflexivity.
-
-Right ; Split with ZERO; Reflexivity.
-
-NewDestruct p.
-Right ; Split with (NEG (add xH p)).
-Rewrite NEG_xI.
-Rewrite NEG_add.
-Omega.
-
-Left ; Split with (NEG p); Reflexivity.
-
-Right ; Split with `-1`; Reflexivity.
-Qed.
-
-(**********************************************************************)
-(** The biggest power of 2 that is stricly less than [a]
-
- Easy to compute: replace all "1" of the binary representation by
- "0", except the first "1" (or the first one :-) *)
-
-Fixpoint floor_pos [a : positive] : positive :=
- Cases a of
- | xH => xH
- | (xO a') => (xO (floor_pos a'))
- | (xI b') => (xO (floor_pos b'))
- end.
-
-Definition floor := [a:positive](POS (floor_pos a)).
-
-Lemma floor_gt0 : (x:positive) `(floor x) > 0`.
-Proof.
-Intro.
-Compute.
-Trivial.
-Qed.
-
-Lemma floor_ok : (a:positive)
- `(floor a) <= (POS a) < 2*(floor a)`.
-Proof.
-Unfold floor.
-Intro a; NewInduction a as [p|p|].
-
-Simpl.
-Repeat Rewrite POS_xI.
-Rewrite (POS_xO (xO (floor_pos p))).
-Rewrite (POS_xO (floor_pos p)).
-Omega.
-
-Simpl.
-Repeat Rewrite POS_xI.
-Rewrite (POS_xO (xO (floor_pos p))).
-Rewrite (POS_xO (floor_pos p)).
-Rewrite (POS_xO p).
-Omega.
-
-Simpl; Omega.
-Qed.
-
-(**********************************************************************)
-(** Two more induction principles over [Z]. *)
-
-Theorem Z_lt_abs_rec : (P: Z -> Set)
- ((n: Z) ((m: Z) `|m|<|n|` -> (P m)) -> (P n)) -> (p: Z) (P p).
-Proof.
-Intros P HP p.
-LetTac Q:=[z]`0<=z`->(P z)*(P `-z`).
-Cut (Q `|p|`);[Intros|Apply (Z_lt_rec Q);Auto with zarith].
-Elim (Zabs_dec p);Intro eq;Rewrite eq;Elim H;Auto with zarith.
-Unfold Q;Clear Q;Intros.
-Apply pair;Apply HP.
-Rewrite Zabs_eq;Auto;Intros.
-Elim (H `|m|`);Intros;Auto with zarith.
-Elim (Zabs_dec m);Intro eq;Rewrite eq;Trivial.
-Rewrite Zabs_non_eq;Auto with zarith.
-Rewrite Zopp_Zopp;Intros.
-Elim (H `|m|`);Intros;Auto with zarith.
-Elim (Zabs_dec m);Intro eq;Rewrite eq;Trivial.
-Qed.
-
-Theorem Z_lt_abs_induction : (P: Z -> Prop)
- ((n: Z) ((m: Z) `|m|<|n|` -> (P m)) -> (P n)) -> (p: Z) (P p).
-Proof.
-Intros P HP p.
-LetTac Q:=[z]`0<=z`->(P z) /\ (P `-z`).
-Cut (Q `|p|`);[Intros|Apply (Z_lt_induction Q);Auto with zarith].
-Elim (Zabs_dec p);Intro eq;Rewrite eq;Elim H;Auto with zarith.
-Unfold Q;Clear Q;Intros.
-Split;Apply HP.
-Rewrite Zabs_eq;Auto;Intros.
-Elim (H `|m|`);Intros;Auto with zarith.
-Elim (Zabs_dec m);Intro eq;Rewrite eq;Trivial.
-Rewrite Zabs_non_eq;Auto with zarith.
-Rewrite Zopp_Zopp;Intros.
-Elim (H `|m|`);Intros;Auto with zarith.
-Elim (Zabs_dec m);Intro eq;Rewrite eq;Trivial.
-Qed.
-V7only [Unset Implicit Arguments.].
-
-(** To do case analysis over the sign of [z] *)
-
-Lemma Zcase_sign : (x:Z)(P:Prop)
- (`x=0` -> P) ->
- (`x>0` -> P) ->
- (`x<0` -> P) -> P.
-Proof.
-Intros x P Hzero Hpos Hneg.
-Induction x.
-Apply Hzero; Trivial.
-Apply Hpos; Apply POS_gt_ZERO.
-Apply Hneg; Apply NEG_lt_ZERO.
-Save.
-
-Lemma sqr_pos : (x:Z)`x*x >= 0`.
-Proof.
-Intro x.
-Apply (Zcase_sign x `x*x >= 0`).
-Intros H; Rewrite H; Omega.
-Intros H; Replace `0` with `0*0`.
-Apply Zge_Zmult_pos_compat; Omega.
-Omega.
-Intros H; Replace `0` with `0*0`.
-Replace `x*x` with `(-x)*(-x)`.
-Apply Zge_Zmult_pos_compat; Omega.
-Ring.
-Omega.
-Save.
-
-(**********************************************************************)
-(** A list length in Z, tail recursive. *)
-
-Require PolyList.
-
-Fixpoint Zlength_aux [acc: Z; A:Set; l:(list A)] : Z := Cases l of
- nil => acc
- | (cons _ l) => (Zlength_aux (Zs acc) A l)
-end.
-
-Definition Zlength := (Zlength_aux 0).
-Implicits Zlength [1].
-
-Section Zlength_properties.
-
-Variable A:Set.
-
-Implicit Variable Type l:(list A).
-
-Lemma Zlength_correct : (l:(list A))(Zlength l)=(inject_nat (length l)).
-Proof.
-Assert (l:(list A))(acc:Z)(Zlength_aux acc A l)=acc+(inject_nat (length l)).
-Induction l.
-Simpl; Auto with zarith.
-Intros; Simpl (length (cons a l0)); Rewrite inj_S.
-Simpl; Rewrite H; Auto with zarith.
-Unfold Zlength; Intros; Rewrite H; Auto.
-Qed.
-
-Lemma Zlength_nil : (Zlength 1!A (nil A))=0.
-Proof.
-Auto.
-Qed.
-
-Lemma Zlength_cons : (x:A)(l:(list A))(Zlength (cons x l))=(Zs (Zlength l)).
-Proof.
-Intros; Do 2 Rewrite Zlength_correct.
-Simpl (length (cons x l)); Rewrite inj_S; Auto.
-Qed.
-
-Lemma Zlength_nil_inv : (l:(list A))(Zlength l)=0 -> l=(nil ?).
-Proof.
-Intro l; Rewrite Zlength_correct.
-Case l; Auto.
-Intros x l'; Simpl (length (cons x l')).
-Rewrite inj_S.
-Intros; ElimType False; Generalize (ZERO_le_inj (length l')); Omega.
-Qed.
-
-End Zlength_properties.
-
-Implicits Zlength_correct [1].
-Implicits Zlength_cons [1].
-Implicits Zlength_nil_inv [1].