summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/theories7/IntMap/Addec.v
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'theories7/IntMap/Addec.v')
-rw-r--r--theories7/IntMap/Addec.v179
1 files changed, 179 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/theories7/IntMap/Addec.v b/theories7/IntMap/Addec.v
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..50dc1480
--- /dev/null
+++ b/theories7/IntMap/Addec.v
@@ -0,0 +1,179 @@
+(************************************************************************)
+(* v * The Coq Proof Assistant / The Coq Development Team *)
+(* <O___,, * CNRS-Ecole Polytechnique-INRIA Futurs-Universite Paris Sud *)
+(* \VV/ **************************************************************)
+(* // * This file is distributed under the terms of the *)
+(* * GNU Lesser General Public License Version 2.1 *)
+(************************************************************************)
+(*i $Id: Addec.v,v 1.1.2.1 2004/07/16 19:31:26 herbelin Exp $ i*)
+
+(** Equality on adresses *)
+
+Require Bool.
+Require Sumbool.
+Require ZArith.
+Require Addr.
+
+Fixpoint ad_eq_1 [p1,p2:positive] : bool :=
+ Cases p1 p2 of
+ xH xH => true
+ | (xO p'1) (xO p'2) => (ad_eq_1 p'1 p'2)
+ | (xI p'1) (xI p'2) => (ad_eq_1 p'1 p'2)
+ | _ _ => false
+ end.
+
+Definition ad_eq := [a,a':ad]
+ Cases a a' of
+ ad_z ad_z => true
+ | (ad_x p) (ad_x p') => (ad_eq_1 p p')
+ | _ _ => false
+ end.
+
+Lemma ad_eq_correct : (a:ad) (ad_eq a a)=true.
+Proof.
+ NewDestruct a; Trivial.
+ NewInduction p; Trivial.
+Qed.
+
+Lemma ad_eq_complete : (a,a':ad) (ad_eq a a')=true -> a=a'.
+Proof.
+ NewDestruct a. NewDestruct a'; Trivial. NewDestruct p.
+ Discriminate 1.
+ Discriminate 1.
+ Discriminate 1.
+ NewDestruct a'. Intros. Discriminate H.
+ Unfold ad_eq. Intros. Cut p=p0. Intros. Rewrite H0. Reflexivity.
+ Generalize Dependent p0.
+ NewInduction p as [p IHp|p IHp|]. NewDestruct p0; Intro H.
+ Rewrite (IHp p0). Reflexivity.
+ Exact H.
+ Discriminate H.
+ Discriminate H.
+ NewDestruct p0; Intro H. Discriminate H.
+ Rewrite (IHp p0 H). Reflexivity.
+ Discriminate H.
+ NewDestruct p0; Intro H. Discriminate H.
+ Discriminate H.
+ Trivial.
+Qed.
+
+Lemma ad_eq_comm : (a,a':ad) (ad_eq a a')=(ad_eq a' a).
+Proof.
+ Intros. Cut (b,b':bool)(ad_eq a a')=b->(ad_eq a' a)=b'->b=b'.
+ Intros. Apply H. Reflexivity.
+ Reflexivity.
+ NewDestruct b. Intros. Cut a=a'.
+ Intro. Rewrite H1 in H0. Rewrite (ad_eq_correct a') in H0. Exact H0.
+ Apply ad_eq_complete. Exact H.
+ NewDestruct b'. Intros. Cut a'=a.
+ Intro. Rewrite H1 in H. Rewrite H1 in H0. Rewrite <- H. Exact H0.
+ Apply ad_eq_complete. Exact H0.
+ Trivial.
+Qed.
+
+Lemma ad_xor_eq_true : (a,a':ad) (ad_xor a a')=ad_z -> (ad_eq a a')=true.
+Proof.
+ Intros. Rewrite (ad_xor_eq a a' H). Apply ad_eq_correct.
+Qed.
+
+Lemma ad_xor_eq_false :
+ (a,a':ad) (p:positive) (ad_xor a a')=(ad_x p) -> (ad_eq a a')=false.
+Proof.
+ Intros. Elim (sumbool_of_bool (ad_eq a a')). Intro H0.
+ Rewrite (ad_eq_complete a a' H0) in H. Rewrite (ad_xor_nilpotent a') in H. Discriminate H.
+ Trivial.
+Qed.
+
+Lemma ad_bit_0_1_not_double : (a:ad) (ad_bit_0 a)=true ->
+ (a0:ad) (ad_eq (ad_double a0) a)=false.
+Proof.
+ Intros. Elim (sumbool_of_bool (ad_eq (ad_double a0) a)). Intro H0.
+ Rewrite <- (ad_eq_complete ? ? H0) in H. Rewrite (ad_double_bit_0 a0) in H. Discriminate H.
+ Trivial.
+Qed.
+
+Lemma ad_not_div_2_not_double : (a,a0:ad) (ad_eq (ad_div_2 a) a0)=false ->
+ (ad_eq a (ad_double a0))=false.
+Proof.
+ Intros. Elim (sumbool_of_bool (ad_eq (ad_double a0) a)). Intro H0.
+ Rewrite <- (ad_eq_complete ? ? H0) in H. Rewrite (ad_double_div_2 a0) in H.
+ Rewrite (ad_eq_correct a0) in H. Discriminate H.
+ Intro. Rewrite ad_eq_comm. Assumption.
+Qed.
+
+Lemma ad_bit_0_0_not_double_plus_un : (a:ad) (ad_bit_0 a)=false ->
+ (a0:ad) (ad_eq (ad_double_plus_un a0) a)=false.
+Proof.
+ Intros. Elim (sumbool_of_bool (ad_eq (ad_double_plus_un a0) a)). Intro H0.
+ Rewrite <- (ad_eq_complete ? ? H0) in H. Rewrite (ad_double_plus_un_bit_0 a0) in H.
+ Discriminate H.
+ Trivial.
+Qed.
+
+Lemma ad_not_div_2_not_double_plus_un : (a,a0:ad) (ad_eq (ad_div_2 a) a0)=false ->
+ (ad_eq (ad_double_plus_un a0) a)=false.
+Proof.
+ Intros. Elim (sumbool_of_bool (ad_eq a (ad_double_plus_un a0))). Intro H0.
+ Rewrite (ad_eq_complete ? ? H0) in H. Rewrite (ad_double_plus_un_div_2 a0) in H.
+ Rewrite (ad_eq_correct a0) in H. Discriminate H.
+ Intro H0. Rewrite ad_eq_comm. Assumption.
+Qed.
+
+Lemma ad_bit_0_neq :
+ (a,a':ad) (ad_bit_0 a)=false -> (ad_bit_0 a')=true -> (ad_eq a a')=false.
+Proof.
+ Intros. Elim (sumbool_of_bool (ad_eq a a')). Intro H1. Rewrite (ad_eq_complete ? ? H1) in H.
+ Rewrite H in H0. Discriminate H0.
+ Trivial.
+Qed.
+
+Lemma ad_div_eq :
+ (a,a':ad) (ad_eq a a')=true -> (ad_eq (ad_div_2 a) (ad_div_2 a'))=true.
+Proof.
+ Intros. Cut a=a'. Intros. Rewrite H0. Apply ad_eq_correct.
+ Apply ad_eq_complete. Exact H.
+Qed.
+
+Lemma ad_div_neq : (a,a':ad) (ad_eq (ad_div_2 a) (ad_div_2 a'))=false ->
+ (ad_eq a a')=false.
+Proof.
+ Intros. Elim (sumbool_of_bool (ad_eq a a')). Intro H0.
+ Rewrite (ad_eq_complete ? ? H0) in H. Rewrite (ad_eq_correct (ad_div_2 a')) in H. Discriminate H.
+ Trivial.
+Qed.
+
+Lemma ad_div_bit_eq : (a,a':ad) (ad_bit_0 a)=(ad_bit_0 a') ->
+ (ad_div_2 a)=(ad_div_2 a') -> a=a'.
+Proof.
+ Intros. Apply ad_faithful. Unfold eqf. NewDestruct n.
+ Rewrite ad_bit_0_correct. Rewrite ad_bit_0_correct. Assumption.
+ Rewrite <- ad_div_2_correct. Rewrite <- ad_div_2_correct.
+ Rewrite H0. Reflexivity.
+Qed.
+
+Lemma ad_div_bit_neq : (a,a':ad) (ad_eq a a')=false -> (ad_bit_0 a)=(ad_bit_0 a') ->
+ (ad_eq (ad_div_2 a) (ad_div_2 a'))=false.
+Proof.
+ Intros. Elim (sumbool_of_bool (ad_eq (ad_div_2 a) (ad_div_2 a'))). Intro H1.
+ Rewrite (ad_div_bit_eq ? ? H0 (ad_eq_complete ? ? H1)) in H.
+ Rewrite (ad_eq_correct a') in H. Discriminate H.
+ Trivial.
+Qed.
+
+Lemma ad_neq : (a,a':ad) (ad_eq a a')=false ->
+ (ad_bit_0 a)=(negb (ad_bit_0 a')) \/ (ad_eq (ad_div_2 a) (ad_div_2 a'))=false.
+Proof.
+ Intros. Cut (ad_bit_0 a)=(ad_bit_0 a')\/(ad_bit_0 a)=(negb (ad_bit_0 a')).
+ Intros. Elim H0. Intro. Right . Apply ad_div_bit_neq. Assumption.
+ Assumption.
+ Intro. Left . Assumption.
+ Case (ad_bit_0 a); Case (ad_bit_0 a'); Auto.
+Qed.
+
+Lemma ad_double_or_double_plus_un : (a:ad)
+ {a0:ad | a=(ad_double a0)}+{a1:ad | a=(ad_double_plus_un a1)}.
+Proof.
+ Intro. Elim (sumbool_of_bool (ad_bit_0 a)). Intro H. Right . Split with (ad_div_2 a).
+ Rewrite (ad_div_2_double_plus_un a H). Reflexivity.
+ Intro H. Left . Split with (ad_div_2 a). Rewrite (ad_div_2_double a H). Reflexivity.
+Qed.