summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/theories/Logic/ClassicalUniqueChoice.v
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'theories/Logic/ClassicalUniqueChoice.v')
-rw-r--r--theories/Logic/ClassicalUniqueChoice.v79
1 files changed, 79 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/theories/Logic/ClassicalUniqueChoice.v b/theories/Logic/ClassicalUniqueChoice.v
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..79bef2af
--- /dev/null
+++ b/theories/Logic/ClassicalUniqueChoice.v
@@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
+(************************************************************************)
+(* v * The Coq Proof Assistant / The Coq Development Team *)
+(* <O___,, * CNRS-Ecole Polytechnique-INRIA Futurs-Universite Paris Sud *)
+(* \VV/ **************************************************************)
+(* // * This file is distributed under the terms of the *)
+(* * GNU Lesser General Public License Version 2.1 *)
+(************************************************************************)
+
+(*i $Id: ClassicalUniqueChoice.v 8893 2006-06-04 18:04:53Z herbelin $ i*)
+
+(** This file provides classical logic and unique choice *)
+
+(** Classical logic and unique choice, as shown in
+ [ChicliPottierSimpson02], implies the double-negation of
+ excluded-middle in [Set], hence it implies a strongly classical
+ world. Especially it conflicts with the impredicativity of [Set].
+
+ [ChicliPottierSimpson02] Laurent Chicli, Loïc Pottier, Carlos
+ Simpson, Mathematical Quotients and Quotient Types in Coq,
+ Proceedings of TYPES 2002, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2646,
+ Springer Verlag. *)
+
+Require Export Classical.
+
+Axiom
+ dependent_unique_choice :
+ forall (A:Type) (B:A -> Type) (R:forall x:A, B x -> Prop),
+ (forall x : A, exists! y : B x, R x y) ->
+ (exists f : (forall x:A, B x), forall x:A, R x (f x)).
+
+(** Unique choice reifies functional relations into functions *)
+
+Theorem unique_choice :
+ forall (A B:Type) (R:A -> B -> Prop),
+ (forall x:A, exists! y : B, R x y) ->
+ (exists f:A->B, forall x:A, R x (f x)).
+Proof.
+intros A B.
+apply (dependent_unique_choice A (fun _ => B)).
+Qed.
+
+(** The followig proof comes from [ChicliPottierSimpson02] *)
+
+Require Import Setoid.
+
+Theorem classic_set : ((forall P:Prop, {P} + {~ P}) -> False) -> False.
+Proof.
+intro HnotEM.
+set (R := fun A b => A /\ true = b \/ ~ A /\ false = b).
+assert (H : exists f : Prop -> bool, (forall A:Prop, R A (f A))).
+apply unique_choice.
+intro A.
+destruct (classic A) as [Ha| Hnota].
+ exists true; split.
+ left; split; [ assumption | reflexivity ].
+ intros y [[_ Hy]| [Hna _]].
+ assumption.
+ contradiction.
+ exists false; split.
+ right; split; [ assumption | reflexivity ].
+ intros y [[Ha _]| [_ Hy]].
+ contradiction.
+ assumption.
+destruct H as [f Hf].
+apply HnotEM.
+intro P.
+assert (HfP := Hf P).
+(* Elimination from Hf to Set is not allowed but from f to Set yes ! *)
+destruct (f P).
+ left.
+ destruct HfP as [[Ha _]| [_ Hfalse]].
+ assumption.
+ discriminate.
+ right.
+ destruct HfP as [[_ Hfalse]| [Hna _]].
+ discriminate.
+ assumption.
+Qed.
+