diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'test-suite/output')
28 files changed, 344 insertions, 25 deletions
diff --git a/test-suite/output/Arguments_renaming.out b/test-suite/output/Arguments_renaming.out index e73312c6..c0b04eb5 100644 --- a/test-suite/output/Arguments_renaming.out +++ b/test-suite/output/Arguments_renaming.out @@ -1,6 +1,5 @@ The command has indeed failed with message: -To rename arguments the "rename" flag must be specified. -Argument A renamed to B. +Flag "rename" expected to rename A into B. File "stdin", line 2, characters 0-25: Warning: This command is just asserting the names of arguments of identity. If this is what you want add ': assert' to silence the warning. If you want @@ -113,5 +112,4 @@ Argument z cannot be declared implicit. The command has indeed failed with message: Extra arguments: y. The command has indeed failed with message: -To rename arguments the "rename" flag must be specified. -Argument A renamed to R. +Flag "rename" expected to rename A into R. diff --git a/test-suite/output/BadOptionValueType.out b/test-suite/output/BadOptionValueType.out new file mode 100644 index 00000000..34d8518a --- /dev/null +++ b/test-suite/output/BadOptionValueType.out @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ +The command has indeed failed with message: +Bad type of value for this option: expected int, got string. +The command has indeed failed with message: +Bad type of value for this option: expected bool, got string. +The command has indeed failed with message: +Bad type of value for this option: expected bool, got int. +The command has indeed failed with message: +Bad type of value for this option: expected bool, got int. diff --git a/test-suite/output/BadOptionValueType.v b/test-suite/output/BadOptionValueType.v new file mode 100644 index 00000000..b61c3757 --- /dev/null +++ b/test-suite/output/BadOptionValueType.v @@ -0,0 +1,4 @@ +Fail Set Default Timeout "2". +Fail Set Debug Eauto "yes". +Fail Set Debug Eauto 1. +Fail Set Implicit Arguments 1. diff --git a/test-suite/output/Cases.out b/test-suite/output/Cases.out index 419dcadb..dfab400b 100644 --- a/test-suite/output/Cases.out +++ b/test-suite/output/Cases.out @@ -169,3 +169,5 @@ fun x : K => match x with | _ => 2 end : K -> nat +The command has indeed failed with message: +Pattern "S _, _" is redundant in this clause. diff --git a/test-suite/output/Cases.v b/test-suite/output/Cases.v index caf3b287..e4fa7044 100644 --- a/test-suite/output/Cases.v +++ b/test-suite/output/Cases.v @@ -163,6 +163,7 @@ match goal with |- ?y + _ = _ => pose (match y as y with 0 => 0 | S n => 0 end) match goal with |- ?y + _ = _ => pose (match y as y return y=y with 0 => eq_refl | S n => eq_refl end) end. match goal with |- ?y + _ = _ => pose (match y return y=y with 0 => eq_refl | S n => eq_refl end) end. Show. +Abort. Lemma lem5 (p:nat) : eq_refl p = eq_refl p. let y := fresh "n" in (* Checking that y is hidden *) @@ -216,3 +217,6 @@ Check fun x => match x with a3 | a4 => 3 | _ => 2 end. Check fun x => match x with a3 => 3 | a2 | a1 => 4 | _ => 2 end. Check fun x => match x with a4 => 3 | a2 | a1 => 4 | _ => 2 end. Check fun x => match x with a3 | a4 | a1 => 3 | _ => 2 end. + +(* Test redundant clause within a disjunctive pattern *) +Fail Check fun n m => match n, m with 0, 0 | _, S _ | S 0, _ | S (S _ | _), _ => false end. diff --git a/test-suite/output/Deprecation.out b/test-suite/output/Deprecation.out new file mode 100644 index 00000000..7e290847 --- /dev/null +++ b/test-suite/output/Deprecation.out @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +File "stdin", line 5, characters 0-3: +Warning: Tactic foo is deprecated since X.Y. Use idtac instead. +[deprecated-tactic,deprecated] diff --git a/test-suite/output/Deprecation.v b/test-suite/output/Deprecation.v new file mode 100644 index 00000000..04d5eb3d --- /dev/null +++ b/test-suite/output/Deprecation.v @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ +#[deprecated(since = "X.Y", note = "Use idtac instead.")] + Ltac foo := idtac. + +Goal True. +foo. +Abort. diff --git a/test-suite/output/Errors.out b/test-suite/output/Errors.out index 38d055b2..24180c45 100644 --- a/test-suite/output/Errors.out +++ b/test-suite/output/Errors.out @@ -8,3 +8,11 @@ Unable to unify "nat" with "True". The command has indeed failed with message: Ltac call to "instantiate ( (ident) := (lglob) )" failed. Instance is not well-typed in the environment of ?x. +The command has indeed failed with message: +Cannot infer the domain of the type of f. +The command has indeed failed with message: +Cannot infer the domain of the implicit parameter A of id whose type is +"Type". +The command has indeed failed with message: +Cannot infer the codomain of the type of f in environment: +x : nat diff --git a/test-suite/output/Errors.v b/test-suite/output/Errors.v index 424d2480..c9b50913 100644 --- a/test-suite/output/Errors.v +++ b/test-suite/output/Errors.v @@ -25,3 +25,9 @@ eexists ?[x]. destruct H1 as [x1 H1]. Fail instantiate (x:=projT1 x1). Abort. + +(* Test some messages for non solvable evars *) + +Fail Goal forall a f, f a = 0. +Fail Goal forall f x, id f x = 0. +Fail Goal forall f P, P (f 0). diff --git a/test-suite/output/Notations.out b/test-suite/output/Notations.out index b60b1ee8..94b86fc2 100644 --- a/test-suite/output/Notations.out +++ b/test-suite/output/Notations.out @@ -125,13 +125,15 @@ s : nat fun _ : nat => 9 : nat -> nat -fun (x : nat) (p : x = x) => match p with - | ONE => ONE - end = p +fun (x : nat) (p : x = x) => +match p in (_ = n) return (n = n) with +| ONE => ONE +end = p : forall x : nat, x = x -> Prop -fun (x : nat) (p : x = x) => match p with - | 1 => 1 - end = p +fun (x : nat) (p : x = x) => +match p in (_ = n) return (n = n) with +| 1 => 1 +end = p : forall x : nat, x = x -> Prop bar 0 : nat diff --git a/test-suite/output/Notations3.out b/test-suite/output/Notations3.out index 5ab61616..d32cf67e 100644 --- a/test-suite/output/Notations3.out +++ b/test-suite/output/Notations3.out @@ -246,3 +246,9 @@ Notation ============================ ##@% ^^^ +myfoo01 tt + : nat +myfoo01 tt + : nat +myfoo01 tt + : nat diff --git a/test-suite/output/Notations3.v b/test-suite/output/Notations3.v index 876aaa39..180e8d33 100644 --- a/test-suite/output/Notations3.v +++ b/test-suite/output/Notations3.v @@ -399,3 +399,14 @@ Show. Abort. End Issue7731. + +Module Issue8126. + +Definition myfoo (x : nat) (y : nat) (z : unit) := y. +Notation myfoo0 := (@myfoo 0). +Notation myfoo01 := (@myfoo0 1). +Check myfoo 0 1 tt. (* was printing [myfoo0 1 HI], but should print [myfoo01 HI] *) +Check myfoo0 1 tt. (* was printing [myfoo0 1 HI], but should print [myfoo01 HI] *) +Check myfoo01 tt. (* was printing [myfoo0 1 HI], but should print [myfoo01 HI] *) + +End Issue8126. diff --git a/test-suite/output/Notations4.out b/test-suite/output/Notations4.out new file mode 100644 index 00000000..46784d18 --- /dev/null +++ b/test-suite/output/Notations4.out @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ +[< 0 > + < 1 > * < 2 >] + : nat +[< b > + < b > * < 2 >] + : nat +[<< # 0 >>] + : option nat +[1 {f 1}] + : Expr +fun (x : nat) (y z : Expr) => [1 + y z + {f x}] + : nat -> Expr -> Expr -> Expr +fun e : Expr => +match e with +| [x y + z] => [x + y z] +| [1 + 1] => [1] +| _ => [e + e] +end + : Expr -> Expr +[(1 + 1)] + : Expr diff --git a/test-suite/output/Notations4.v b/test-suite/output/Notations4.v new file mode 100644 index 00000000..6bdbf1be --- /dev/null +++ b/test-suite/output/Notations4.v @@ -0,0 +1,72 @@ +(* An example with constr subentries *) + +Module A. + +Declare Custom Entry myconstr. + +Notation "[ x ]" := x (x custom myconstr at level 6). +Notation "x + y" := (Nat.add x y) (in custom myconstr at level 5). +Notation "x * y" := (Nat.mul x y) (in custom myconstr at level 4). +Notation "< x >" := x (in custom myconstr at level 3, x constr at level 10). +Check [ < 0 > + < 1 > * < 2 >]. + +Axiom a : nat. +Notation b := a. +Check [ < b > + < a > * < 2 >]. + +Declare Custom Entry anotherconstr. + +Notation "[ x ]" := x (x custom myconstr at level 6). +Notation "<< x >>" := x (in custom myconstr at level 3, x custom anotherconstr at level 10). +Notation "# x" := (Some x) (in custom anotherconstr at level 8, x constr at level 9). +Check [ << # 0 >> ]. + +End A. + +Module B. + +Inductive Expr := + | Mul : Expr -> Expr -> Expr + | Add : Expr -> Expr -> Expr + | One : Expr. + +Declare Custom Entry expr. +Notation "[ expr ]" := expr (expr custom expr at level 2). +Notation "1" := One (in custom expr at level 0). +Notation "x y" := (Mul x y) (in custom expr at level 1, left associativity). +Notation "x + y" := (Add x y) (in custom expr at level 2, left associativity). +Notation "( x )" := x (in custom expr at level 0, x at level 2). +Notation "{ x }" := x (in custom expr at level 0, x constr). +Notation "x" := x (in custom expr at level 0, x ident). + +Axiom f : nat -> Expr. +Check [1 {f 1}]. +Check fun x y z => [1 + y z + {f x}]. +Check fun e => match e with +| [x y + z] => [x + y z] +| [1 + 1] => [1] +| y => [y + e] +end. + +End B. + +Module C. + +Inductive Expr := + | Add : Expr -> Expr -> Expr + | One : Expr. + +Declare Custom Entry expr. +Notation "[ expr ]" := expr (expr custom expr at level 1). +Notation "1" := One (in custom expr at level 0). +Notation "x + y" := (Add x y) (in custom expr at level 2, left associativity). +Notation "( x )" := x (in custom expr at level 0, x at level 2). + +(* Check the use of a two-steps coercion from constr to expr 1 then + from expr 0 to expr 2 (note that camlp5 parsing is more tolerant + and does not require parentheses to parse from level 2 while at + level 1) *) + +Check [1 + 1]. + +End C. diff --git a/test-suite/output/PrintInfos.out b/test-suite/output/PrintInfos.out index 1307a8f2..975b2ef7 100644 --- a/test-suite/output/PrintInfos.out +++ b/test-suite/output/PrintInfos.out @@ -85,8 +85,8 @@ bar : forall x : nat, x = 0 Argument x is implicit and maximally inserted Module Coq.Init.Peano -Notation existS2 := existT2 -Expands to: Notation Coq.Init.Specif.existS2 +Notation sym_eq := eq_sym +Expands to: Notation Coq.Init.Logic.sym_eq Inductive eq (A : Type) (x : A) : A -> Prop := eq_refl : x = x For eq: Argument A is implicit and maximally inserted diff --git a/test-suite/output/PrintInfos.v b/test-suite/output/PrintInfos.v index a498db3e..62aa80f8 100644 --- a/test-suite/output/PrintInfos.v +++ b/test-suite/output/PrintInfos.v @@ -26,8 +26,7 @@ About bar. Print bar. About Peano. (* Module *) -Set Warnings "-deprecated". -About existS2. (* Notation *) +About sym_eq. (* Notation *) Arguments eq_refl {A} {x}, {A} x. Print eq_refl. @@ -46,4 +45,3 @@ Goal forall n:nat, let g := newdef in n <> newdef n -> newdef n <> n -> False. About g. (* search hypothesis *) About h. (* search hypothesis *) Abort. - diff --git a/test-suite/output/RecordMissingField.out b/test-suite/output/RecordMissingField.out new file mode 100644 index 00000000..7c80a606 --- /dev/null +++ b/test-suite/output/RecordMissingField.out @@ -0,0 +1,4 @@ +File "stdin", line 8, characters 5-22: +Error: Cannot infer field y2p of record point2d in environment: +p : point2d + diff --git a/test-suite/output/RecordMissingField.v b/test-suite/output/RecordMissingField.v new file mode 100644 index 00000000..84f1748f --- /dev/null +++ b/test-suite/output/RecordMissingField.v @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ +(** Check for error message when missing a record field. Error message +should contain missing field, and the inferred type of the record **) + +Record point2d := mkPoint { x2p: nat; y2p: nat }. + + +Definition increment_x (p: point2d) : point2d := + {| x2p := x2p p + 1; |}. diff --git a/test-suite/output/UnclosedBlocks.out b/test-suite/output/UnclosedBlocks.out index b83e94ad..31481e84 100644 --- a/test-suite/output/UnclosedBlocks.out +++ b/test-suite/output/UnclosedBlocks.out @@ -1,3 +1,2 @@ - Error: The section Baz, module type Bar and module Foo need to be closed. diff --git a/test-suite/output/Unicode.out b/test-suite/output/Unicode.out new file mode 100644 index 00000000..a57b3bba --- /dev/null +++ b/test-suite/output/Unicode.out @@ -0,0 +1,41 @@ +1 subgoal + + very_very_long_type_name1 : Type + very_very_long_type_name2 : Type + f : very_very_long_type_name1 → very_very_long_type_name2 → Prop + ============================ + True + → True + → ∀ (x : very_very_long_type_name1) (y : very_very_long_type_name2), + f x y ∧ f x y ∧ f x y ∧ f x y ∧ f x y ∧ f x y +1 subgoal + + very_very_long_type_name1 : Type + very_very_long_type_name2 : Type + f : very_very_long_type_name1 → very_very_long_type_name2 → Prop + ============================ + True + → True + → ∀ (x : very_very_long_type_name2) (y : very_very_long_type_name1) + (z : very_very_long_type_name2), f y x ∧ f y z +1 subgoal + + very_very_long_type_name1 : Type + very_very_long_type_name2 : Type + f : very_very_long_type_name1 → very_very_long_type_name2 → Prop + ============================ + True + → True + → ∀ (x : very_very_long_type_name2) (y : very_very_long_type_name1) + (z : very_very_long_type_name2), + f y x ∧ f y z ∧ f y x ∧ f y z ∧ f y x ∧ f y z +1 subgoal + + very_very_long_type_name1 : Type + very_very_long_type_name2 : Type + f : very_very_long_type_name1 → very_very_long_type_name2 → Prop + ============================ + True + → True + → ∃ (x : very_very_long_type_name1) (y : very_very_long_type_name2), + f x y ∧ f x y ∧ f x y ∧ f x y ∧ f x y ∧ f x y diff --git a/test-suite/output/Unicode.v b/test-suite/output/Unicode.v new file mode 100644 index 00000000..42b07e5a --- /dev/null +++ b/test-suite/output/Unicode.v @@ -0,0 +1,28 @@ +Require Import Coq.Unicode.Utf8. + +Section test. +Context (very_very_long_type_name1 : Type) (very_very_long_type_name2 : Type). +Context (f : very_very_long_type_name1 -> very_very_long_type_name2 -> Prop). + +Lemma test : True -> True -> + forall (x : very_very_long_type_name1) (y : very_very_long_type_name2), + f x y /\ f x y /\ f x y /\ f x y /\ f x y /\ f x y. +Proof. Show. Abort. + +Lemma test : True -> True -> + forall (x : very_very_long_type_name2) (y : very_very_long_type_name1) + (z : very_very_long_type_name2), + f y x /\ f y z. +Proof. Show. Abort. + +Lemma test : True -> True -> + forall (x : very_very_long_type_name2) (y : very_very_long_type_name1) + (z : very_very_long_type_name2), + f y x /\ f y z /\ f y x /\ f y z /\ f y x /\ f y z. +Proof. Show. Abort. + +Lemma test : True -> True -> + exists (x : very_very_long_type_name1) (y : very_very_long_type_name2), + f x y /\ f x y /\ f x y /\ f x y /\ f x y /\ f x y. +Proof. Show. Abort. +End test. diff --git a/test-suite/output/bug5778.out b/test-suite/output/bug5778.out index 91ceb1b5..d6056c50 100644 --- a/test-suite/output/bug5778.out +++ b/test-suite/output/bug5778.out @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ The command has indeed failed with message: -In nested Ltac calls to "c", "abs" and "abstract b ltac:(())", last call -failed. +In nested Ltac calls to "c", "abs", "abstract b ltac:(())", +"b", "a", "pose (I : I)" and "(I : I)", last term evaluation failed. The term "I" has type "True" which should be Set, Prop or Type. diff --git a/test-suite/output/bug6404.out b/test-suite/output/bug6404.out new file mode 100644 index 00000000..05464755 --- /dev/null +++ b/test-suite/output/bug6404.out @@ -0,0 +1,4 @@ +The command has indeed failed with message: +In nested Ltac calls to "c", "abs", "transparent_abstract (tactic3)", +"b", "a", "pose (I : I)" and "(I : I)", last term evaluation failed. +The term "I" has type "True" which should be Set, Prop or Type. diff --git a/test-suite/output/bug6404.v b/test-suite/output/bug6404.v new file mode 100644 index 00000000..bbe6b1a0 --- /dev/null +++ b/test-suite/output/bug6404.v @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ +Ltac a _ := pose (I : I). +Ltac b _ := a (). +Ltac abs _ := transparent_abstract b (). +Ltac c _ := abs (). +Goal True. + Fail c (). +Abort. diff --git a/test-suite/output/ltac.v b/test-suite/output/ltac.v index 6adbe95d..901b1e3a 100644 --- a/test-suite/output/ltac.v +++ b/test-suite/output/ltac.v @@ -37,17 +37,20 @@ Fail g1 I. Fail f1 I. Fail g2 I. Fail f2 I. +Abort. Ltac h x := injection x. Goal True -> False. Fail h I. intro H. Fail h H. +Abort. (* Check printing of the "var" argument "Hx" *) Ltac m H := idtac H; exact H. Goal True. let a:=constr:(let Hx := 0 in ltac:(m Hx)) in idtac. +Abort. (* Check consistency of interpretation scopes (#4398) *) diff --git a/test-suite/output/ltac_missing_args.out b/test-suite/output/ltac_missing_args.out index 7326f137..8a00cd3f 100644 --- a/test-suite/output/ltac_missing_args.out +++ b/test-suite/output/ltac_missing_args.out @@ -1,25 +1,25 @@ The command has indeed failed with message: -The user-defined tactic "Top.foo" was not fully applied: +The user-defined tactic "foo" was not fully applied: There is a missing argument for variable x, no arguments at all were provided. The command has indeed failed with message: -The user-defined tactic "Top.bar" was not fully applied: +The user-defined tactic "bar" was not fully applied: There is a missing argument for variable x, no arguments at all were provided. The command has indeed failed with message: -The user-defined tactic "Top.bar" was not fully applied: +The user-defined tactic "bar" was not fully applied: There are missing arguments for variables y and _, an argument was provided for variable x. The command has indeed failed with message: -The user-defined tactic "Top.baz" was not fully applied: +The user-defined tactic "baz" was not fully applied: There is a missing argument for variable x, no arguments at all were provided. The command has indeed failed with message: -The user-defined tactic "Top.qux" was not fully applied: +The user-defined tactic "qux" was not fully applied: There is a missing argument for variable x, no arguments at all were provided. The command has indeed failed with message: -The user-defined tactic "Top.mydo" was not fully applied: +The user-defined tactic "mydo" was not fully applied: There is a missing argument for variable _, no arguments at all were provided. The command has indeed failed with message: @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ An unnamed user-defined tactic was not fully applied: There is a missing argument for variable _, no arguments at all were provided. The command has indeed failed with message: -The user-defined tactic "Top.rec" was not fully applied: +The user-defined tactic "rec" was not fully applied: There is a missing argument for variable x, no arguments at all were provided. The command has indeed failed with message: diff --git a/test-suite/output/ssr_explain_match.out b/test-suite/output/ssr_explain_match.out new file mode 100644 index 00000000..32cfb354 --- /dev/null +++ b/test-suite/output/ssr_explain_match.out @@ -0,0 +1,55 @@ +File "stdin", line 12, characters 0-61: +Warning: Notation "_ - _" was already used in scope nat_scope. +[notation-overridden,parsing] +File "stdin", line 12, characters 0-61: +Warning: Notation "_ <= _" was already used in scope nat_scope. +[notation-overridden,parsing] +File "stdin", line 12, characters 0-61: +Warning: Notation "_ < _" was already used in scope nat_scope. +[notation-overridden,parsing] +File "stdin", line 12, characters 0-61: +Warning: Notation "_ >= _" was already used in scope nat_scope. +[notation-overridden,parsing] +File "stdin", line 12, characters 0-61: +Warning: Notation "_ > _" was already used in scope nat_scope. +[notation-overridden,parsing] +File "stdin", line 12, characters 0-61: +Warning: Notation "_ <= _ <= _" was already used in scope nat_scope. +[notation-overridden,parsing] +File "stdin", line 12, characters 0-61: +Warning: Notation "_ < _ <= _" was already used in scope nat_scope. +[notation-overridden,parsing] +File "stdin", line 12, characters 0-61: +Warning: Notation "_ <= _ < _" was already used in scope nat_scope. +[notation-overridden,parsing] +File "stdin", line 12, characters 0-61: +Warning: Notation "_ < _ < _" was already used in scope nat_scope. +[notation-overridden,parsing] +File "stdin", line 12, characters 0-61: +Warning: Notation "_ + _" was already used in scope nat_scope. +[notation-overridden,parsing] +File "stdin", line 12, characters 0-61: +Warning: Notation "_ * _" was already used in scope nat_scope. +[notation-overridden,parsing] +BEGIN INSTANCES +instance: (x + y + z) matches: (x + y + z) +instance: (x + y) matches: (x + y) +instance: (x + y) matches: (x + y) +END INSTANCES +BEGIN INSTANCES +instance: (addnC (x + y) z) matches: (x + y + z) +instance: (addnC x y) matches: (x + y) +instance: (addnC x y) matches: (x + y) +END INSTANCES +BEGIN INSTANCES +instance: (addnA x y z) matches: (x + y + z) +END INSTANCES +BEGIN INSTANCES +instance: (addnA x y z) matches: (x + y + z) +instance: (addnC z (x + y)) matches: (x + y + z) +instance: (addnC y x) matches: (x + y) +instance: (addnC y x) matches: (x + y) +END INSTANCES +The command has indeed failed with message: +Ltac call to "ssrinstancesoftpat (cpattern)" failed. +Not supported diff --git a/test-suite/output/ssr_explain_match.v b/test-suite/output/ssr_explain_match.v new file mode 100644 index 00000000..56ca24b6 --- /dev/null +++ b/test-suite/output/ssr_explain_match.v @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ +(************************************************************************) +(* * The Coq Proof Assistant / The Coq Development Team *) +(* v * INRIA, CNRS and contributors - Copyright 1999-2018 *) +(* <O___,, * (see CREDITS file for the list of authors) *) +(* \VV/ **************************************************************) +(* // * This file is distributed under the terms of the *) +(* * GNU Lesser General Public License Version 2.1 *) +(* * (see LICENSE file for the text of the license) *) +(************************************************************************) + +Require Import ssrmatching. +Require Import ssreflect ssrbool TestSuite.ssr_mini_mathcomp. + +Definition addnAC := (addnA, addnC). + +Lemma test x y z : x + y + z = x + y. + +ssrinstancesoftpat (_ + _). +ssrinstancesofruleL2R addnC. +ssrinstancesofruleR2L addnA. +ssrinstancesofruleR2L addnAC. +Fail ssrinstancesoftpat (_ + _ in RHS). (* Not implemented *) +Admitted. |