diff options
author | 2012-01-12 16:04:54 +0100 | |
---|---|---|
committer | 2012-01-12 16:04:54 +0100 | |
commit | 39efc41237ec906226a3a53d7396d51173495204 (patch) | |
tree | 87cd58d72d43469d2a2a0a127c1060d7c9e0206b /test-suite/output/rewrite-2172.v | |
parent | 5fe4ac437bed43547b3695664974f492b55cb553 (diff) | |
parent | 97fefe1fcca363a1317e066e7f4b99b9c1e9987b (diff) |
Remove non-DFSG contentsupstream/8.4_beta+dfsg
Diffstat (limited to 'test-suite/output/rewrite-2172.v')
-rw-r--r-- | test-suite/output/rewrite-2172.v | 21 |
1 files changed, 21 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/test-suite/output/rewrite-2172.v b/test-suite/output/rewrite-2172.v new file mode 100644 index 00000000..212b1c12 --- /dev/null +++ b/test-suite/output/rewrite-2172.v @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ +(* This checks an error message as reported in bug #2172 *) + +Axiom axiom : forall (E F : nat), E = F. +Lemma test : forall (E F : nat), E = F. +Proof. + intros. +(* This used to raise the following non understandable error message: + + Error: Unable to find an instance for the variable x + + The reason this error was that rewrite generated the proof + + "eq_ind ?A ?x ?P ? ?y (axiom ?E ?F)" + + and the equation ?x=?E was solved in the way ?E:=?x leaving ?x + unresolved. A stupid hack for solve this consisted in ordering + meta=meta equations the other way round (with most recent evars + instantiated first - since they are assumed to come first from the + user in rewrite/induction/destruct calls). +*) + Fail rewrite <- axiom. |