Merge branch 'experimental/upstream' into upstream

1 files changed, 584 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/plugins/setoid_ring/Ncring_polynom.v b/plugins/setoid_ring/Ncring_polynom.v
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..8e4b613f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/plugins/setoid_ring/Ncring_polynom.v
@@ -0,0 +1,584 @@
+(************************************************************************)
+(*  v      *   The Coq Proof Assistant  /  The Coq Development Team     *)
+(* <O___,, *   INRIA - CNRS - LIX - LRI - PPS - Copyright 1999-2012     *)
+(*   \VV/  **************************************************************)
+(*    //   *      This file is distributed under the terms of the       *)
+(*         *       GNU Lesser General Public License Version 2.1        *)
+(************************************************************************)
+
+(*  A <X1,...,Xn>: non commutative polynomials on a commutative ring A *)
+
+Set Implicit Arguments.
+Require Import Setoid.
+Require Import BinList.
+Require Import BinPos.
+Require Import BinNat.
+Require Import BinInt.
+Require Export Ring_polynom. (* n'utilise que PExpr *)
+Require Export Ncring.
+
+Section MakeRingPol.
+
+Context (C R:Type) `{Rh:Ring_morphism C R}.
+
+Variable phiCR_comm: forall (c:C)(x:R), x * [c] == [c] * x.
+
+ Ltac rsimpl := repeat (gen_rewrite || rewrite phiCR_comm).
+ Ltac add_push := gen_add_push .
+
+(* Definition of non commutative multivariable polynomials 
+   with coefficients in C :
+ *)
+
+ Inductive Pol : Type :=
+  | Pc : C -> Pol
+  | PX : Pol -> positive -> positive -> Pol -> Pol. 
+    (* PX P i n Q represents P * X_i^n + Q *)
+Definition cO:C . exact ring0. Defined.
+Definition cI:C . exact ring1. Defined.
+
+ Definition P0 := Pc 0.
+ Definition P1 := Pc 1.
+
+Variable Ceqb:C->C->bool.
+Class Equalityb (A : Type):= {equalityb : A -> A -> bool}.
+Notation "x =? y" := (equalityb x y) (at level 70, no associativity).
+Variable Ceqb_eq: forall x y:C, Ceqb x y = true -> (x == y).
+
+Instance equalityb_coef : Equalityb C :=
+  {equalityb x y := Ceqb x y}.
+
+ Fixpoint Peq (P P' : Pol) {struct P'} : bool :=
+  match P, P' with
+  | Pc c, Pc c' => c =? c'
+  | PX P i n Q, PX P' i' n' Q' =>
+    match Pos.compare i i', Pos.compare n n' with
+    | Eq, Eq => if Peq P P' then Peq Q Q' else false
+    | _,_ => false
+    end
+  | _, _ => false
+  end.
+
+Instance equalityb_pol : Equalityb Pol :=
+  {equalityb x y := Peq x y}.
+
+(* Q a ses variables de queue < i *)
+ Definition mkPX P i n Q :=
+  match P with
+  | Pc c => if c =? 0 then Q else PX P i n Q 
+  | PX P' i' n' Q' => 
+       match Pos.compare i i' with
+        | Eq => if Q' =? P0 then PX P' i (n + n') Q else PX P i n Q
+        | _ => PX P i n Q
+       end
+  end.
+
+ Definition mkXi i n := PX P1 i n P0.
+
+ Definition mkX i := mkXi i 1.
+
+ (** Opposite of addition *)
+
+ Fixpoint Popp (P:Pol) : Pol :=
+  match P with
+  | Pc c => Pc (- c)
+  | PX P i n Q => PX (Popp P) i n (Popp Q)
+  end.
+
+ Notation "-- P" := (Popp P)(at level 30).
+
+ (** Addition et subtraction *)
+
+ Fixpoint PaddCl (c:C)(P:Pol) {struct P} : Pol :=
+  match P with
+  | Pc c1 => Pc (c + c1)
+  | PX P i n Q => PX P i n (PaddCl c Q)
+  end.
+
+(* Q quelconque *)
+
+Section PaddX.
+Variable Padd:Pol->Pol->Pol.
+Variable P:Pol.
+
+(* Xi^n * P + Q
+les variables de tete de Q ne sont pas forcement < i 
+mais Q est normalisé : variables de tete decroissantes *)
+
+Fixpoint PaddX (i n:positive)(Q:Pol){struct Q}:=
+  match Q with
+  | Pc c => mkPX P i n Q
+  | PX P' i' n' Q' => 
+      match Pos.compare i i' with
+      | (* i > i' *)
+        Gt => mkPX P i n Q
+      | (* i < i' *)
+        Lt => mkPX P' i' n' (PaddX i n Q')
+      | (* i = i' *)
+        Eq => match Z.pos_sub n n' with
+              | (* n > n' *) 
+                Zpos k => mkPX (PaddX i k P') i' n' Q'
+              | (* n = n' *)
+                Z0 => mkPX (Padd P P') i n Q'
+              | (* n < n' *)
+                Zneg k => mkPX (Padd P (mkPX P' i k P0)) i n Q'
+              end
+      end
+  end.
+
+End PaddX.
+
+Fixpoint Padd (P1 P2: Pol) {struct P1} : Pol :=
+  match P1 with
+  | Pc c => PaddCl c P2
+  | PX P' i' n' Q' =>
+      PaddX Padd P' i' n' (Padd Q' P2)
+  end.
+
+ Notation "P ++ P'" := (Padd P P').
+
+Definition Psub(P P':Pol):= P ++ (--P').
+
+ Notation "P -- P'" := (Psub P P')(at level 50).
+
+ (** Multiplication *)
+
+ Fixpoint PmulC_aux (P:Pol) (c:C)  {struct P} : Pol :=
+  match P with
+  | Pc c' => Pc (c' * c)
+  | PX P i n Q => mkPX (PmulC_aux P c) i n (PmulC_aux Q c)
+  end.
+
+ Definition PmulC P c :=
+  if c =? 0 then P0 else
+  if c =? 1 then P else PmulC_aux P c.
+
+ Fixpoint Pmul (P1 P2 : Pol) {struct P2} : Pol :=
+   match P2 with
+   | Pc c => PmulC P1 c
+   | PX P i n Q =>
+     PaddX Padd (Pmul P1 P) i n (Pmul P1 Q)
+   end.
+
+ Notation "P ** P'" := (Pmul P P')(at level 40).
+
+ Definition Psquare (P:Pol) : Pol := P ** P.
+
+
+ (** Evaluation of a polynomial towards R *)
+
+ Fixpoint Pphi(l:list R) (P:Pol) {struct P} : R :=
+  match P with
+  | Pc c => [c]
+  | PX P i n Q =>
+     let x := nth 0 i l in
+     let xn := pow_pos x n in
+   (Pphi l P) * xn + (Pphi l Q)
+  end.
+
+ Reserved Notation "P @ l " (at level 10, no associativity).
+ Notation "P @ l " := (Pphi l P).
+
+ (** Proofs *)
+
+ Ltac destr_pos_sub H :=
+  match goal with |- context [Z.pos_sub ?x ?y] =>
+   assert (H := Z.pos_sub_discr x y); destruct (Z.pos_sub x y)
+  end.
+
+ Lemma Peq_ok : forall P P',
+    (P =? P') = true -> forall l, P@l == P'@ l.
+ Proof.
+ induction P;destruct P';simpl;intros ;try easy.
+ - now apply ring_morphism_eq, Ceqb_eq.
+ - specialize (IHP1 P'1). specialize (IHP2 P'2).
+   simpl in IHP1, IHP2.
+   destruct (Pos.compare_spec p p1); try discriminate;
+   destruct (Pos.compare_spec p0 p2); try discriminate.
+   destruct (Peq P2 P'1); try discriminate.
+   subst; now rewrite IHP1, IHP2.
+ Qed.
+
+ Lemma Pphi0 : forall l, P0@l == 0.
+ Proof.
+  intros;simpl. 
+ rewrite ring_morphism0. reflexivity.
+ Qed.
+
+ Lemma Pphi1 : forall l,  P1@l == 1.
+ Proof.
+  intros;simpl; rewrite ring_morphism1. reflexivity.
+ Qed.
+
+ Lemma mkPX_ok : forall l P i n Q,
+  (mkPX P i n Q)@l == P@l * (pow_pos (nth 0 i l) n) + Q@l.
+ Proof.
+  intros l P i n Q;unfold mkPX.
+  destruct P;try (simpl;reflexivity).
+  assert (Hh := ring_morphism_eq  c 0). 
+simpl; case_eq (Ceqb c 0);simpl;try reflexivity.
+intros.
+  rewrite Hh. rewrite ring_morphism0.
+  rsimpl. apply Ceqb_eq. trivial.
+  destruct (Pos.compare_spec i p).
+  assert (Hh := @Peq_ok P3 P0). case_eq (P3=? P0). intro. simpl. 
+  rewrite Hh. 
+  rewrite Pphi0. rsimpl. rewrite Pos.add_comm. rewrite pow_pos_add;rsimpl.
+  subst;trivial. reflexivity. trivial. intros. simpl. reflexivity. simpl. reflexivity.
+ simpl. reflexivity.
+ Qed.
+
+Ltac Esimpl :=
+  repeat (progress (
+   match goal with
+   | |- context [?P@?l] =>
+       match P with
+       | P0 => rewrite (Pphi0 l)
+       | P1 => rewrite (Pphi1 l)
+       | (mkPX ?P ?i ?n ?Q) => rewrite (mkPX_ok l P i n Q)
+       end
+   | |- context [[?c]] =>
+       match c with
+       | 0 => rewrite ring_morphism0
+       | 1 => rewrite ring_morphism1
+       | ?x + ?y => rewrite ring_morphism_add
+       | ?x * ?y => rewrite ring_morphism_mul
+       | ?x - ?y => rewrite ring_morphism_sub
+       | - ?x => rewrite ring_morphism_opp
+       end
+   end));
+  simpl; rsimpl.
+
+ Lemma PaddCl_ok : forall c P l, (PaddCl c P)@l == [c] + P@l .
+ Proof.
+  induction P; simpl; intros; Esimpl; try reflexivity.
+ rewrite IHP2. rsimpl. 
+rewrite (ring_add_comm  (P2 @ l * pow_pos (nth 0 p l) p0) [c]).
+reflexivity.
+ Qed.
+
+ Lemma PmulC_aux_ok : forall c P l, (PmulC_aux P c)@l ==  P@l * [c].
+ Proof.
+  induction P;simpl;intros.  rewrite ring_morphism_mul.
+try reflexivity.
+  simpl. Esimpl.  rewrite IHP1;rewrite IHP2;rsimpl. 
+  Qed.
+
+ Lemma PmulC_ok : forall c P l, (PmulC P c)@l ==  P@l * [c].
+ Proof.
+  intros c P l; unfold PmulC.
+  assert (Hh:= ring_morphism_eq c 0);case_eq (c =? 0). intros.
+  rewrite Hh;Esimpl. apply Ceqb_eq;trivial. 
+  assert (H1h:= ring_morphism_eq c 1);case_eq (c =? 1);intros.
+  rewrite H1h;Esimpl. apply Ceqb_eq;trivial.
+  apply PmulC_aux_ok.
+ Qed.
+
+ Lemma Popp_ok : forall P l, (--P)@l == - P@l.
+ Proof.
+  induction P;simpl;intros.
+  Esimpl.
+  rewrite IHP1;rewrite IHP2;rsimpl.
+ Qed.
+
+ Ltac Esimpl2 :=
+  Esimpl;
+  repeat (progress (
+   match goal with
+   | |- context [(PaddCl ?c ?P)@?l] => rewrite (PaddCl_ok c P l)
+   | |- context [(PmulC ?P ?c)@?l] => rewrite (PmulC_ok c P l)
+   | |- context [(--?P)@?l] => rewrite (Popp_ok P l)
+   end)); Esimpl.
+
+Lemma PaddXPX: forall P i n Q,
+  PaddX Padd P i n Q =
+  match Q with
+  | Pc c => mkPX P i n Q
+  | PX P' i' n' Q' => 
+      match Pos.compare i i' with
+      | (* i > i' *)
+        Gt => mkPX P i n Q
+      | (* i < i' *)
+        Lt => mkPX P' i' n' (PaddX Padd P i n Q')
+      | (* i = i' *)
+        Eq => match Z.pos_sub n n' with
+              | (* n > n' *) 
+                Zpos k => mkPX (PaddX Padd P i k P') i' n' Q'
+              | (* n = n' *)
+                Z0 => mkPX (Padd P P') i n Q'
+              | (* n < n' *)
+                Zneg k => mkPX (Padd P (mkPX P' i k P0)) i n Q'
+              end
+      end
+  end.
+induction Q; reflexivity.
+Qed.
+
+Lemma PaddX_ok2 : forall P2,
+   (forall P l, (P2 ++ P) @ l == P2 @ l + P @ l)
+   /\
+   (forall P k n l,
+           (PaddX Padd P2 k n P) @ l == 
+             P2 @ l * pow_pos (nth 0 k l) n  + P @ l).
+induction P2;simpl;intros. split. intros. apply PaddCl_ok.
+ induction P.  unfold PaddX. intros. rewrite mkPX_ok.
+ simpl. rsimpl.
+intros. simpl.
+ destruct (Pos.compare_spec k p) as [Hh|Hh|Hh].
+ destr_pos_sub H1h. Esimpl2.
+rewrite Hh; trivial. rewrite H1h. reflexivity.
+simpl. rewrite mkPX_ok. rewrite IHP1. Esimpl2.
+ rewrite Pos.add_comm in H1h.
+rewrite H1h. 
+rewrite pow_pos_add.  Esimpl2.
+rewrite Hh; trivial. reflexivity.
+rewrite mkPX_ok. rewrite PaddCl_ok. Esimpl2. rewrite Pos.add_comm in H1h.
+rewrite H1h.  Esimpl2. rewrite pow_pos_add. Esimpl2.
+rewrite Hh; trivial. reflexivity.
+rewrite mkPX_ok. rewrite IHP2. Esimpl2.
+rewrite (ring_add_comm  (P2 @ l * pow_pos (nth 0 p l) p0) 
+                             ([c] * pow_pos (nth 0 k l) n)).
+reflexivity.  assert (H1h := ring_morphism_eq c 0);case_eq (Ceqb c  0); 
+ intros; simpl.
+rewrite H1h;trivial. Esimpl2. apply Ceqb_eq; trivial. reflexivity.
+decompose [and] IHP2_1. decompose [and] IHP2_2. clear IHP2_1 IHP2_2.
+split. intros. rewrite H0. rewrite H1.
+Esimpl2.
+induction P. unfold PaddX. intros. rewrite mkPX_ok. simpl. reflexivity.
+intros. rewrite PaddXPX. 
+destruct (Pos.compare_spec k p1) as [H3h|H3h|H3h].
+destr_pos_sub H4h.
+rewrite mkPX_ok. simpl. rewrite H0. rewrite H1. Esimpl2.
+rewrite H4h. rewrite H3h;trivial. reflexivity.
+rewrite mkPX_ok. rewrite IHP1. Esimpl2. rewrite H3h;trivial.
+rewrite Pos.add_comm in H4h.
+rewrite H4h. rewrite pow_pos_add. Esimpl2.
+rewrite mkPX_ok. simpl. rewrite H0. rewrite H1. 
+rewrite mkPX_ok.
+ Esimpl2. rewrite H3h;trivial.
+ rewrite Pos.add_comm in H4h.
+rewrite H4h. rewrite pow_pos_add. Esimpl2.
+rewrite mkPX_ok. simpl. rewrite IHP2. Esimpl2.
+gen_add_push (P2 @ l * pow_pos (nth 0 p1 l) p2). try reflexivity.
+rewrite mkPX_ok. simpl. reflexivity.
+Qed.
+
+Lemma Padd_ok : forall P Q l, (P ++ Q) @ l == P @ l + Q @ l.
+intro P. elim (PaddX_ok2 P); auto.
+Qed.
+
+Lemma PaddX_ok : forall P2 P k n l,
+   (PaddX Padd P2 k n P) @ l ==  P2 @ l * pow_pos (nth 0 k l) n  + P @ l.
+intro P2. elim (PaddX_ok2 P2); auto.
+Qed.
+
+ Lemma Psub_ok : forall P' P l, (P -- P')@l == P@l - P'@l.
+unfold Psub. intros. rewrite Padd_ok. rewrite Popp_ok. rsimpl.
+ Qed.
+
+ Lemma Pmul_ok : forall P P' l, (P**P')@l == P@l * P'@l.
+induction P'; simpl; intros. rewrite PmulC_ok. reflexivity.
+rewrite PaddX_ok. rewrite IHP'1. rewrite IHP'2. Esimpl2.
+Qed.
+
+ Lemma Psquare_ok : forall P l, (Psquare P)@l == P@l * P@l.
+ Proof.
+  intros. unfold Psquare. apply Pmul_ok.
+ Qed.
+
+ (** Definition of polynomial expressions *)
+
+(*
+ Inductive PExpr : Type :=
+  | PEc : C -> PExpr
+  | PEX : positive -> PExpr
+  | PEadd : PExpr -> PExpr -> PExpr
+  | PEsub : PExpr -> PExpr -> PExpr
+  | PEmul : PExpr -> PExpr -> PExpr
+  | PEopp : PExpr -> PExpr
+  | PEpow : PExpr -> N -> PExpr.
+*)
+
+ (** Specification of the power function *)
+ Section POWER.
+  Variable Cpow : Set.
+  Variable Cp_phi : N -> Cpow.
+  Variable rpow : R -> Cpow -> R.
+
+  Record power_theory : Prop := mkpow_th {
+    rpow_pow_N : forall r n,  (rpow r (Cp_phi n))== (pow_N r n)
+  }.
+
+ End POWER.
+ Variable Cpow : Set.
+ Variable Cp_phi : N -> Cpow.
+ Variable rpow : R -> Cpow -> R.
+ Variable pow_th : power_theory Cp_phi rpow.
+
+ (** evaluation of polynomial expressions towards R *)
+ Fixpoint PEeval (l:list R) (pe:PExpr C) {struct pe} : R :=
+   match pe with
+   | PEc c => [c]
+   | PEX j => nth 0 j l
+   | PEadd pe1 pe2 => (PEeval l pe1) + (PEeval l pe2)
+   | PEsub pe1 pe2 => (PEeval l pe1) - (PEeval l pe2)
+   | PEmul pe1 pe2 => (PEeval l pe1) * (PEeval l pe2)
+   | PEopp pe1 => - (PEeval l pe1)
+   | PEpow pe1 n => rpow (PEeval l pe1) (Cp_phi n)
+   end.
+
+Strategy expand [PEeval].
+
+ Definition mk_X j := mkX j.
+
+ (** Correctness proofs *)
+
+ Lemma mkX_ok : forall p l, nth 0 p l == (mk_X p) @ l.
+ Proof.
+  destruct p;simpl;intros;Esimpl;trivial.
+ Qed.
+
+ Ltac Esimpl3 :=
+  repeat match goal with
+  | |- context [(?P1 ++ ?P2)@?l] => rewrite (Padd_ok P1 P2 l)
+  | |- context [(?P1 -- ?P2)@?l] => rewrite (Psub_ok P1 P2 l)
+  end;try Esimpl2;try reflexivity;try apply ring_add_comm.
+
+(* Power using the chinise algorithm *)
+
+Section POWER2.
+  Variable subst_l : Pol -> Pol.
+  Fixpoint Ppow_pos (res P:Pol) (p:positive){struct p} : Pol :=
+   match p with
+   | xH => subst_l (Pmul P res)
+   | xO p => Ppow_pos (Ppow_pos res P p) P p
+   | xI p => subst_l (Pmul P (Ppow_pos (Ppow_pos res P p) P p))
+   end.
+
+  Definition Ppow_N P n :=
+   match n with
+   | N0 => P1
+   | Npos p => Ppow_pos P1 P p
+   end.
+
+  Fixpoint pow_pos_gen (R:Type)(m:R->R->R)(x:R) (i:positive) {struct i}: R :=
+  match i with
+  | xH => x
+  | xO i => let p := pow_pos_gen m x i in m p p
+  | xI i => let p := pow_pos_gen m x i in m x (m p p)
+  end.
+
+Lemma Ppow_pos_ok : forall l, (forall P, subst_l P@l == P@l) ->
+         forall res P p, (Ppow_pos res P p)@l == (pow_pos_gen Pmul P p)@l * res@l.
+  Proof.
+   intros l subst_l_ok res P p. generalize res;clear res.
+   induction p;simpl;intros. try rewrite subst_l_ok.
+ repeat rewrite Pmul_ok. repeat rewrite IHp.
+   rsimpl. repeat rewrite Pmul_ok. repeat rewrite IHp. rsimpl.
+ try rewrite subst_l_ok.
+ repeat rewrite Pmul_ok. reflexivity.
+  Qed.
+
+Definition pow_N_gen (R:Type)(x1:R)(m:R->R->R)(x:R) (p:N) :=
+  match p with
+  | N0 => x1
+  | Npos p => pow_pos_gen m x p
+  end.
+
+  Lemma Ppow_N_ok : forall l,  (forall P, subst_l P@l == P@l) ->
+         forall P n, (Ppow_N P n)@l == (pow_N_gen P1 Pmul P n)@l.
+  Proof.  destruct n;simpl. reflexivity. rewrite Ppow_pos_ok; trivial. Esimpl.  Qed.
+
+ End POWER2.
+
+ (** Normalization and rewriting *)
+
+ Section NORM_SUBST_REC.
+  Let subst_l (P:Pol) := P.
+  Let Pmul_subst P1 P2 := subst_l (Pmul P1 P2).
+  Let Ppow_subst := Ppow_N subst_l.
+
+  Fixpoint norm_aux (pe:PExpr C) : Pol :=
+   match pe with
+   | PEc c => Pc c
+   | PEX j => mk_X j
+   | PEadd pe1 (PEopp pe2) =>
+     Psub (norm_aux pe1) (norm_aux pe2)
+   | PEadd pe1 pe2 => Padd (norm_aux  pe1) (norm_aux pe2)
+   | PEsub pe1 pe2 => Psub (norm_aux pe1) (norm_aux pe2)
+   | PEmul pe1 pe2 => Pmul (norm_aux pe1) (norm_aux pe2)
+   | PEopp pe1 => Popp (norm_aux pe1)
+   | PEpow pe1 n => Ppow_N (fun p => p) (norm_aux pe1) n
+   end.
+
+  Definition norm_subst pe := subst_l (norm_aux pe).
+
+ 
+ Lemma norm_aux_spec :
+     forall l pe, 
+       PEeval l pe == (norm_aux pe)@l.
+  Proof.
+   intros.
+   induction pe.
+Esimpl3. Esimpl3. simpl.
+ rewrite IHpe1;rewrite IHpe2.
+ destruct pe2; Esimpl3. 
+unfold Psub.
+destruct pe1; destruct pe2; rewrite Padd_ok; rewrite Popp_ok; reflexivity.
+simpl. unfold Psub. rewrite IHpe1;rewrite IHpe2.
+destruct pe1. destruct pe2; rewrite Padd_ok; rewrite Popp_ok; try reflexivity.
+Esimpl3. Esimpl3. Esimpl3. Esimpl3. Esimpl3. Esimpl3.
+ Esimpl3. Esimpl3. Esimpl3. Esimpl3. Esimpl3. Esimpl3. Esimpl3.
+simpl. rewrite IHpe1;rewrite IHpe2. rewrite Pmul_ok. reflexivity.
+simpl. rewrite IHpe; Esimpl3. 
+simpl.
+   rewrite Ppow_N_ok; (intros;try reflexivity). 
+   rewrite rpow_pow_N.  Esimpl3.
+   induction n;simpl. Esimpl3. induction p; simpl.
+  try rewrite IHp;try rewrite IHpe;
+ repeat rewrite Pms_ok;
+      repeat rewrite Pmul_ok;reflexivity.
+rewrite Pmul_ok. try rewrite IHp;try rewrite IHpe;
+ repeat rewrite Pms_ok;
+      repeat rewrite Pmul_ok;reflexivity. trivial.
+exact pow_th.
+  Qed.
+
+ Lemma norm_subst_spec :
+     forall l pe, 
+       PEeval l pe == (norm_subst pe)@l.
+ Proof.
+  intros;unfold norm_subst.
+  unfold subst_l.  apply norm_aux_spec. 
+ Qed.
+
+ End NORM_SUBST_REC.
+
+ Fixpoint interp_PElist (l:list R) (lpe:list (PExpr C * PExpr C)) {struct lpe} : Prop :=
+   match lpe with
+   | nil => True
+   | (me,pe)::lpe =>
+     match lpe with
+     | nil => PEeval l me == PEeval l pe
+     | _ => PEeval l me == PEeval l pe /\ interp_PElist l lpe
+     end
+  end.
+
+
+ Lemma norm_subst_ok : forall l pe,
+   PEeval l pe == (norm_subst pe)@l.
+ Proof.
+   intros;apply norm_subst_spec. 
+  Qed.
+
+
+ Lemma ring_correct : forall l pe1 pe2,
+   (norm_subst pe1 =? norm_subst pe2) = true ->
+   PEeval l pe1 == PEeval l pe2.
+ Proof.
+  simpl;intros.
+  do 2 (rewrite (norm_subst_ok l);trivial).
+  apply Peq_ok;trivial.
+ Qed.
+
+End MakeRingPol.