From d652155ae013f36a1ee17653a8e458baad2d9c2c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Checkmate50 <dgeisler50@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2016 23:14:18 -0600
Subject: Merging complete.  Everything looks good *crosses fingers*

---
 Test/test7/UnreachableBlocks.bpl | 84 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)

(limited to 'Test/test7/UnreachableBlocks.bpl')

diff --git a/Test/test7/UnreachableBlocks.bpl b/Test/test7/UnreachableBlocks.bpl
index 95c35029..90f0b0cb 100644
--- a/Test/test7/UnreachableBlocks.bpl
+++ b/Test/test7/UnreachableBlocks.bpl
@@ -1,42 +1,42 @@
-// RUN: %boogie -vc:nested "%s" > "%t"
-// RUN: %diff "%s.expect" "%t"
-// In the following program, block "A" has no dominator, which would cause Boogie
-// to crash if Boogie didn't first remove unreachable blocks.  That is essentially
-// what this test tests
-procedure P()
-{
-entry:
-  goto A;
-A:
-  return;
-B:
-  goto A;
-}
-
-procedure Q()
-{
-entry:
-  goto entry, A;
-A:
-  return;
-}
-
-procedure R()
-{
-entry:
-  return;
-A:
-  goto A;
-}
-
-procedure S()
-{
-entry:
-  return;
-A:
-  goto C;
-B:
-  goto C;
-C:  // C has no dominator
-  return;
-}
+// RUN: %boogie -vc:nested "%s" > "%t"
+// RUN: %diff "%s.expect" "%t"
+// In the following program, block "A" has no dominator, which would cause Boogie
+// to crash if Boogie didn't first remove unreachable blocks.  That is essentially
+// what this test tests
+procedure P()
+{
+entry:
+  goto A;
+A:
+  return;
+B:
+  goto A;
+}
+
+procedure Q()
+{
+entry:
+  goto entry, A;
+A:
+  return;
+}
+
+procedure R()
+{
+entry:
+  return;
+A:
+  goto A;
+}
+
+procedure S()
+{
+entry:
+  return;
+A:
+  goto C;
+B:
+  goto C;
+C:  // C has no dominator
+  return;
+}
-- 
cgit v1.2.3