diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'absl/random/gaussian_distribution_test.cc')
-rw-r--r-- | absl/random/gaussian_distribution_test.cc | 35 |
1 files changed, 11 insertions, 24 deletions
diff --git a/absl/random/gaussian_distribution_test.cc b/absl/random/gaussian_distribution_test.cc index 2aa7caf4..c0bac2b0 100644 --- a/absl/random/gaussian_distribution_test.cc +++ b/absl/random/gaussian_distribution_test.cc @@ -21,12 +21,14 @@ #include <iterator> #include <random> #include <string> +#include <type_traits> #include <vector> #include "gmock/gmock.h" #include "gtest/gtest.h" #include "absl/base/internal/raw_logging.h" #include "absl/base/macros.h" +#include "absl/numeric/internal/representation.h" #include "absl/random/internal/chi_square.h" #include "absl/random/internal/distribution_test_util.h" #include "absl/random/internal/sequence_urbg.h" @@ -43,7 +45,15 @@ using absl::random_internal::kChiSquared; template <typename RealType> class GaussianDistributionInterfaceTest : public ::testing::Test {}; -using RealTypes = ::testing::Types<float, double, long double>; +// double-double arithmetic is not supported well by either GCC or Clang; see +// https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99048, +// https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49131, and +// https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49132. Don't bother running these tests +// with double doubles until compiler support is better. +using RealTypes = + std::conditional<absl::numeric_internal::IsDoubleDouble(), + ::testing::Types<float, double>, + ::testing::Types<float, double, long double>>::type; TYPED_TEST_CASE(GaussianDistributionInterfaceTest, RealTypes); TYPED_TEST(GaussianDistributionInterfaceTest, SerializeTest) { @@ -129,29 +139,6 @@ TYPED_TEST(GaussianDistributionInterfaceTest, SerializeTest) { ss >> after; -#if defined(__powerpc64__) || defined(__PPC64__) || defined(__powerpc__) || \ - defined(__ppc__) || defined(__PPC__) - if (std::is_same<TypeParam, long double>::value) { - // Roundtripping floating point values requires sufficient precision - // to reconstruct the exact value. It turns out that long double - // has some errors doing this on ppc, particularly for values - // near {1.0 +/- epsilon}. - if (mean <= std::numeric_limits<double>::max() && - mean >= std::numeric_limits<double>::lowest()) { - EXPECT_EQ(static_cast<double>(before.mean()), - static_cast<double>(after.mean())) - << ss.str(); - } - if (stddev <= std::numeric_limits<double>::max() && - stddev >= std::numeric_limits<double>::lowest()) { - EXPECT_EQ(static_cast<double>(before.stddev()), - static_cast<double>(after.stddev())) - << ss.str(); - } - continue; - } -#endif - EXPECT_EQ(before.mean(), after.mean()); EXPECT_EQ(before.stddev(), after.stddev()) // << ss.str() << " " // |