summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/absl/base
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorGravatar Abseil Team <absl-team@google.com>2017-12-01 12:15:49 -0800
committerGravatar Xiaoyi Zhang <zhangxy988@gmail.com>2017-12-01 15:25:15 -0500
commit8b727aa7aba86ce396da8e4886e40ea3e4357e27 (patch)
treea5d22e038a49860ace2c09238c4cca6574198b10 /absl/base
parent579f2879acb6ad6e2935cc970399a1e52c1ee9eb (diff)
Changes imported from Abseil "staging" branch:
- 5d8235b05f4ea2b33a138712f463a30b6ae75719 Incorporate PR https://github.com/abseil/abseil-cpp/pull/... by Xiaoyi Zhang <zhangxy@google.com> - f2bc653acdaa983aa2765693476c17cd1142d59b Run the StrSplit WorksWithLargeStrings test in all configs. by Matt Armstrong <marmstrong@google.com> - 43aed1ea7dffcd656e1916c2d5637650fc3a8de3 Incorporate PR https://github.com/abseil/abseil-cpp/pull/... by Xiaoyi Zhang <zhangxy@google.com> - d58511d60904c7090e44638339ba63b97ca96f1a Add a new simple Mutex lifetime test, to be extended later. by Greg Falcon <gfalcon@google.com> - db5c86c186c09ad57963bcbd2b6182f62bce8ed0 Actually use the exception in TestCheckerAtCountdown by Jon Cohen <cohenjon@google.com> - 29c01a72b62d9a4b90f9bd935e3575adbafd85ed Use factories instead of explicitly passing pointers to T... by Jon Cohen <cohenjon@google.com> - 54d5526ee6ab7784992845f6e6e2c7d48ba008a5 Fix uint128 ostream operator and improve ostream test. by Alex Strelnikov <strel@google.com> - 4e49abe7e569cf6bd0eae95ce2b2fe2faa051fa2 Fix documentation: strings::PairFormatter -> absl::PairFo... by Derek Mauro <dmauro@google.com> - 4044297f0e1a8a6c6ae3f781a65080e0d57c6751 Cut the memory used by the StrSplit WorksWithLargeStrings... by Jorg Brown <jorg@google.com> GitOrigin-RevId: 5d8235b05f4ea2b33a138712f463a30b6ae75719 Change-Id: Ib6b6b0161c26e5326b53a126454754e33678eefc
Diffstat (limited to 'absl/base')
-rw-r--r--absl/base/BUILD.bazel1
-rw-r--r--absl/base/exception_safety_testing_test.cc250
-rw-r--r--absl/base/internal/exception_safety_testing.h128
3 files changed, 195 insertions, 184 deletions
diff --git a/absl/base/BUILD.bazel b/absl/base/BUILD.bazel
index e5284633..743add7e 100644
--- a/absl/base/BUILD.bazel
+++ b/absl/base/BUILD.bazel
@@ -241,6 +241,7 @@ cc_library(
"//absl/memory",
"//absl/meta:type_traits",
"//absl/strings",
+ "//absl/types:optional",
"@com_google_googletest//:gtest",
],
)
diff --git a/absl/base/exception_safety_testing_test.cc b/absl/base/exception_safety_testing_test.cc
index 4931c886..20cbb435 100644
--- a/absl/base/exception_safety_testing_test.cc
+++ b/absl/base/exception_safety_testing_test.cc
@@ -384,70 +384,62 @@ struct CallOperator {
}
};
-struct FailsBasicGuarantee {
+struct NonNegative {
+ friend testing::AssertionResult AbslCheckInvariants(NonNegative* g) {
+ if (g->i >= 0) return testing::AssertionSuccess();
+ return testing::AssertionFailure()
+ << "i should be non-negative but is " << g->i;
+ }
+ bool operator==(const NonNegative& other) const { return i == other.i; }
+
+ int i;
+};
+
+template <typename T>
+struct DefaultFactory {
+ std::unique_ptr<T> operator()() const { return absl::make_unique<T>(); }
+};
+
+struct FailsBasicGuarantee : public NonNegative {
void operator()() {
--i;
ThrowingValue<> bomb;
++i;
}
-
- bool operator==(const FailsBasicGuarantee& other) const {
- return i == other.i;
- }
-
- friend testing::AssertionResult AbslCheckInvariants(
- const FailsBasicGuarantee& g) {
- if (g.i >= 0) return testing::AssertionSuccess();
- return testing::AssertionFailure()
- << "i should be non-negative but is " << g.i;
- }
-
- int i = 0;
};
TEST(ExceptionCheckTest, BasicGuaranteeFailure) {
- FailsBasicGuarantee g;
- EXPECT_FALSE(TestExceptionSafety(&g, CallOperator{}));
+ EXPECT_FALSE(TestExceptionSafety(DefaultFactory<FailsBasicGuarantee>(),
+ CallOperator{}));
}
-struct FollowsBasicGuarantee {
+struct FollowsBasicGuarantee : public NonNegative {
void operator()() {
++i;
ThrowingValue<> bomb;
}
-
- bool operator==(const FollowsBasicGuarantee& other) const {
- return i == other.i;
- }
-
- friend testing::AssertionResult AbslCheckInvariants(
- const FollowsBasicGuarantee& g) {
- if (g.i >= 0) return testing::AssertionSuccess();
- return testing::AssertionFailure()
- << "i should be non-negative but is " << g.i;
- }
-
- int i = 0;
};
TEST(ExceptionCheckTest, BasicGuarantee) {
- FollowsBasicGuarantee g;
- EXPECT_TRUE(TestExceptionSafety(&g, CallOperator{}));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(TestExceptionSafety(DefaultFactory<FollowsBasicGuarantee>(),
+ CallOperator{}));
}
TEST(ExceptionCheckTest, StrongGuaranteeFailure) {
{
- FailsBasicGuarantee g;
- EXPECT_FALSE(TestExceptionSafety(&g, CallOperator{}, StrongGuarantee(g)));
+ DefaultFactory<FailsBasicGuarantee> factory;
+ EXPECT_FALSE(
+ TestExceptionSafety(factory, CallOperator{}, StrongGuarantee(factory)));
}
{
- FollowsBasicGuarantee g;
- EXPECT_FALSE(TestExceptionSafety(&g, CallOperator{}, StrongGuarantee(g)));
+ DefaultFactory<FollowsBasicGuarantee> factory;
+ EXPECT_FALSE(
+ TestExceptionSafety(factory, CallOperator{}, StrongGuarantee(factory)));
}
}
-struct BasicGuaranteeWithExtraInvariants {
+struct BasicGuaranteeWithExtraInvariants : public NonNegative {
// After operator(), i is incremented. If operator() throws, i is set to 9999
void operator()() {
int old_i = i;
@@ -456,92 +448,94 @@ struct BasicGuaranteeWithExtraInvariants {
i = ++old_i;
}
- bool operator==(const FollowsBasicGuarantee& other) const {
- return i == other.i;
- }
-
- friend testing::AssertionResult AbslCheckInvariants(
- const BasicGuaranteeWithExtraInvariants& g) {
- if (g.i >= 0) return testing::AssertionSuccess();
- return testing::AssertionFailure()
- << "i should be non-negative but is " << g.i;
- }
-
- int i = 0;
static constexpr int kExceptionSentinel = 9999;
};
constexpr int BasicGuaranteeWithExtraInvariants::kExceptionSentinel;
TEST(ExceptionCheckTest, BasicGuaranteeWithInvariants) {
- {
- BasicGuaranteeWithExtraInvariants g;
- EXPECT_TRUE(TestExceptionSafety(&g, CallOperator{}));
- }
+ DefaultFactory<BasicGuaranteeWithExtraInvariants> factory;
- {
- BasicGuaranteeWithExtraInvariants g;
- EXPECT_TRUE(TestExceptionSafety(
- &g, CallOperator{}, [](const BasicGuaranteeWithExtraInvariants& w) {
- if (w.i == BasicGuaranteeWithExtraInvariants::kExceptionSentinel) {
- return testing::AssertionSuccess();
- }
- return testing::AssertionFailure()
- << "i should be "
- << BasicGuaranteeWithExtraInvariants::kExceptionSentinel
- << ", but is " << w.i;
- }));
- }
-}
+ EXPECT_TRUE(TestExceptionSafety(factory, CallOperator{}));
-struct FollowsStrongGuarantee {
+ EXPECT_TRUE(TestExceptionSafety(
+ factory, CallOperator{}, [](BasicGuaranteeWithExtraInvariants* w) {
+ if (w->i == BasicGuaranteeWithExtraInvariants::kExceptionSentinel) {
+ return testing::AssertionSuccess();
+ }
+ return testing::AssertionFailure()
+ << "i should be "
+ << BasicGuaranteeWithExtraInvariants::kExceptionSentinel
+ << ", but is " << w->i;
+ }));
+}
+
+struct FollowsStrongGuarantee : public NonNegative {
void operator()() { ThrowingValue<> bomb; }
+};
- bool operator==(const FollowsStrongGuarantee& other) const {
- return i == other.i;
- }
+TEST(ExceptionCheckTest, StrongGuarantee) {
+ DefaultFactory<FollowsStrongGuarantee> factory;
+ EXPECT_TRUE(TestExceptionSafety(factory, CallOperator{}));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(
+ TestExceptionSafety(factory, CallOperator{}, StrongGuarantee(factory)));
+}
- friend testing::AssertionResult AbslCheckInvariants(
- const FollowsStrongGuarantee& g) {
- if (g.i >= 0) return testing::AssertionSuccess();
- return testing::AssertionFailure()
- << "i should be non-negative but is " << g.i;
+struct HasReset : public NonNegative {
+ void operator()() {
+ i = -1;
+ ThrowingValue<> bomb;
+ i = 1;
}
- int i = 0;
+ void reset() { i = 0; }
+
+ friend bool AbslCheckInvariants(HasReset* h) {
+ h->reset();
+ return h->i == 0;
+ }
};
-TEST(ExceptionCheckTest, StrongGuarantee) {
- FollowsStrongGuarantee g;
- EXPECT_TRUE(TestExceptionSafety(&g, CallOperator{}));
- EXPECT_TRUE(TestExceptionSafety(&g, CallOperator{}, StrongGuarantee(g)));
+TEST(ExceptionCheckTest, ModifyingChecker) {
+ {
+ DefaultFactory<FollowsBasicGuarantee> factory;
+ EXPECT_FALSE(TestExceptionSafety(
+ factory, CallOperator{},
+ [](FollowsBasicGuarantee* g) {
+ g->i = 1000;
+ return true;
+ },
+ [](FollowsBasicGuarantee* g) { return g->i == 1000; }));
+ }
+ {
+ DefaultFactory<FollowsStrongGuarantee> factory;
+ EXPECT_TRUE(TestExceptionSafety(factory, CallOperator{},
+ [](FollowsStrongGuarantee* g) {
+ ++g->i;
+ return true;
+ },
+ StrongGuarantee(factory)));
+ }
+ {
+ DefaultFactory<HasReset> factory;
+ EXPECT_TRUE(TestExceptionSafety(factory, CallOperator{}));
+ }
}
-struct NonCopyable {
+struct NonCopyable : public NonNegative {
NonCopyable(const NonCopyable&) = delete;
- explicit NonCopyable(int ii) : i(ii) {}
+ NonCopyable() : NonNegative{0} {}
void operator()() { ThrowingValue<> bomb; }
-
- bool operator==(const NonCopyable& other) const { return i == other.i; }
-
- friend testing::AssertionResult AbslCheckInvariants(const NonCopyable& g) {
- if (g.i >= 0) return testing::AssertionSuccess();
- return testing::AssertionFailure()
- << "i should be non-negative but is " << g.i;
- }
-
- int i;
};
TEST(ExceptionCheckTest, NonCopyable) {
- NonCopyable g(0);
- EXPECT_TRUE(TestExceptionSafety(&g, CallOperator{}));
- EXPECT_TRUE(TestExceptionSafety(
- &g, CallOperator{},
- PointeeStrongGuarantee(absl::make_unique<NonCopyable>(g.i))));
+ DefaultFactory<NonCopyable> factory;
+ EXPECT_TRUE(TestExceptionSafety(factory, CallOperator{}));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(
+ TestExceptionSafety(factory, CallOperator{}, StrongGuarantee(factory)));
}
-struct NonEqualityComparable {
+struct NonEqualityComparable : public NonNegative {
void operator()() { ThrowingValue<> bomb; }
void ModifyOnThrow() {
@@ -550,71 +544,61 @@ struct NonEqualityComparable {
static_cast<void>(bomb);
--i;
}
-
- friend testing::AssertionResult AbslCheckInvariants(
- const NonEqualityComparable& g) {
- if (g.i >= 0) return testing::AssertionSuccess();
- return testing::AssertionFailure()
- << "i should be non-negative but is " << g.i;
- }
-
- int i = 0;
};
TEST(ExceptionCheckTest, NonEqualityComparable) {
- NonEqualityComparable g;
+ DefaultFactory<NonEqualityComparable> factory;
auto comp = [](const NonEqualityComparable& a,
const NonEqualityComparable& b) { return a.i == b.i; };
- EXPECT_TRUE(TestExceptionSafety(&g, CallOperator{}));
- EXPECT_TRUE(
- TestExceptionSafety(&g, CallOperator{}, absl::StrongGuarantee(g, comp)));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(TestExceptionSafety(factory, CallOperator{}));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(TestExceptionSafety(factory, CallOperator{},
+ absl::StrongGuarantee(factory, comp)));
EXPECT_FALSE(TestExceptionSafety(
- &g, [&](NonEqualityComparable* n) { n->ModifyOnThrow(); },
- absl::StrongGuarantee(g, comp)));
+ factory, [&](NonEqualityComparable* n) { n->ModifyOnThrow(); },
+ absl::StrongGuarantee(factory, comp)));
}
template <typename T>
-struct InstructionCounter {
+struct ExhaustivenessTester {
void operator()() {
- ++counter;
+ successes |= 1;
T b1;
static_cast<void>(b1);
- ++counter;
+ successes |= (1 << 1);
T b2;
static_cast<void>(b2);
- ++counter;
+ successes |= (1 << 2);
T b3;
static_cast<void>(b3);
- ++counter;
+ successes |= (1 << 3);
}
- bool operator==(const InstructionCounter<ThrowingValue<>>&) const {
+ bool operator==(const ExhaustivenessTester<ThrowingValue<>>&) const {
return true;
}
- friend testing::AssertionResult AbslCheckInvariants(
- const InstructionCounter&) {
+ friend testing::AssertionResult AbslCheckInvariants(ExhaustivenessTester*) {
return testing::AssertionSuccess();
}
- static int counter;
+ static unsigned char successes;
};
template <typename T>
-int InstructionCounter<T>::counter = 0;
+unsigned char ExhaustivenessTester<T>::successes = 0;
TEST(ExceptionCheckTest, Exhaustiveness) {
- InstructionCounter<int> int_factory;
- EXPECT_TRUE(TestExceptionSafety(&int_factory, CallOperator{}));
- EXPECT_EQ(InstructionCounter<int>::counter, 4);
+ DefaultFactory<ExhaustivenessTester<int>> int_factory;
+ EXPECT_TRUE(TestExceptionSafety(int_factory, CallOperator{}));
+ EXPECT_EQ(ExhaustivenessTester<int>::successes, 0xF);
- InstructionCounter<ThrowingValue<>> bomb_factory;
- EXPECT_TRUE(TestExceptionSafety(&bomb_factory, CallOperator{}));
- EXPECT_EQ(InstructionCounter<ThrowingValue<>>::counter, 10);
+ DefaultFactory<ExhaustivenessTester<ThrowingValue<>>> bomb_factory;
+ EXPECT_TRUE(TestExceptionSafety(bomb_factory, CallOperator{}));
+ EXPECT_EQ(ExhaustivenessTester<ThrowingValue<>>::successes, 0xF);
- InstructionCounter<ThrowingValue<>>::counter = 0;
- EXPECT_TRUE(TestExceptionSafety(&bomb_factory, CallOperator{},
+ ExhaustivenessTester<ThrowingValue<>>::successes = 0;
+ EXPECT_TRUE(TestExceptionSafety(bomb_factory, CallOperator{},
StrongGuarantee(bomb_factory)));
- EXPECT_EQ(InstructionCounter<ThrowingValue<>>::counter, 10);
+ EXPECT_EQ(ExhaustivenessTester<ThrowingValue<>>::successes, 0xF);
}
struct LeaksIfCtorThrows : private exceptions_internal::TrackedObject {
diff --git a/absl/base/internal/exception_safety_testing.h b/absl/base/internal/exception_safety_testing.h
index a0a70d91..05bcd0ab 100644
--- a/absl/base/internal/exception_safety_testing.h
+++ b/absl/base/internal/exception_safety_testing.h
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
#include "absl/meta/type_traits.h"
#include "absl/strings/string_view.h"
#include "absl/strings/substitute.h"
+#include "absl/types/optional.h"
namespace absl {
struct AllocInspector;
@@ -97,19 +98,50 @@ class TrackedObject {
friend struct ::absl::AllocInspector;
};
-template <typename T, typename... Checkers>
-testing::AssertionResult TestInvariants(const T& t, const TestException& e,
- int count,
- const Checkers&... checkers) {
- auto out = AbslCheckInvariants(t);
+template <typename Factory>
+using FactoryType = typename absl::result_of_t<Factory()>::element_type;
+
+// Returns an optional with the result of the check if op fails, or an empty
+// optional if op passes
+template <typename Factory, typename Op, typename Checker>
+absl::optional<testing::AssertionResult> TestCheckerAtCountdown(
+ Factory factory, const Op& op, int count, const Checker& check) {
+ exceptions_internal::countdown = count;
+ auto t_ptr = factory();
+ absl::optional<testing::AssertionResult> out;
+ try {
+ op(t_ptr.get());
+ } catch (const exceptions_internal::TestException& e) {
+ out.emplace(check(t_ptr.get()));
+ if (!*out) {
+ *out << " caused by exception thrown by " << e.what();
+ }
+ }
+ return out;
+}
+
+template <typename Factory, typename Op, typename Checker>
+int UpdateOut(Factory factory, const Op& op, int count, const Checker& checker,
+ testing::AssertionResult* out) {
+ if (*out) *out = *TestCheckerAtCountdown(factory, op, count, checker);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+// Returns an optional with the result of the check if op fails, or an empty
+// optional if op passes
+template <typename Factory, typename Op, typename... Checkers>
+absl::optional<testing::AssertionResult> TestAtCountdown(
+ Factory factory, const Op& op, int count, const Checkers&... checkers) {
// Don't bother with the checkers if the class invariants are already broken.
- bool dummy[] = {true,
- (out && (out = testing::AssertionResult(checkers(t))))...};
- static_cast<void>(dummy);
+ auto out = TestCheckerAtCountdown(
+ factory, op, count,
+ [](FactoryType<Factory>* t_ptr) { return AbslCheckInvariants(t_ptr); });
+ if (!out.has_value()) return out;
- return out ? out
- : out << " Caused by exception " << count << "thrown by "
- << e.what();
+ // Run each checker, short circuiting after the first failure
+ int dummy[] = {0, (UpdateOut(factory, op, count, checkers, &*out))...};
+ static_cast<void>(dummy);
+ return out;
}
template <typename T, typename EqualTo>
@@ -118,9 +150,9 @@ class StrongGuaranteeTester {
explicit StrongGuaranteeTester(std::unique_ptr<T> t_ptr, EqualTo eq) noexcept
: val_(std::move(t_ptr)), eq_(eq) {}
- testing::AssertionResult operator()(const T& other) const {
- return eq_(*val_, other) ? testing::AssertionSuccess()
- : testing::AssertionFailure() << "State changed";
+ testing::AssertionResult operator()(T* other) const {
+ return eq_(*val_, *other) ? testing::AssertionSuccess()
+ : testing::AssertionFailure() << "State changed";
}
private:
@@ -673,58 +705,52 @@ T TestThrowingCtor(Args&&... args) {
}
// Tests that performing operation Op on a T follows exception safety
-// guarantees. By default only tests the basic guarantee.
+// guarantees. By default only tests the basic guarantee. There must be a
+// function, AbslCheckInvariants(T*) which returns
+// anything convertible to bool and which makes sure the invariants of the type
+// are upheld. This is called before any of the checkers.
//
// Parameters:
-// * T: the type under test.
+// * TFactory: operator() returns a unique_ptr to the type under test (T). It
+// should always return pointers to values which compare equal.
// * FunctionFromTPtrToVoid: A functor exercising the function under test. It
// should take a T* and return void.
-// * Checkers: Any number of functions taking a const T& and returning
+// * Checkers: Any number of functions taking a T* and returning
// anything contextually convertible to bool. If a testing::AssertionResult
// is used then the error message is kept. These test invariants related to
// the operation. To test the strong guarantee, pass
-// absl::StrongGuarantee(...) as one of these arguments if T has operator==.
-// Some types for which the strong guarantee makes sense don't have operator==
-// (eg std::any). A function capturing *t or a T equal to it, taking a const
-// T&, and returning contextually-convertible-to-bool may be passed instead.
-template <typename T, typename FunctionFromTPtrToVoid, typename... Checkers>
-testing::AssertionResult TestExceptionSafety(T* t, FunctionFromTPtrToVoid&& op,
+// absl::StrongGuarantee(factory). A checker may freely modify the passed-in
+// T, for example to make sure the T can be set to a known state.
+template <typename TFactory, typename FunctionFromTPtrToVoid,
+ typename... Checkers>
+testing::AssertionResult TestExceptionSafety(TFactory factory,
+ FunctionFromTPtrToVoid&& op,
const Checkers&... checkers) {
- auto out = testing::AssertionSuccess();
for (int countdown = 0;; ++countdown) {
- exceptions_internal::countdown = countdown;
- try {
- op(t);
- break;
- } catch (const exceptions_internal::TestException& e) {
- out = exceptions_internal::TestInvariants(*t, e, countdown, checkers...);
- if (!out) return out;
+ auto out = exceptions_internal::TestAtCountdown(factory, op, countdown,
+ checkers...);
+ if (!out.has_value()) {
+ UnsetCountdown();
+ return testing::AssertionSuccess();
}
+ if (!*out) return *out;
}
- UnsetCountdown();
- return out;
}
-// Returns a functor to test for the strong exception-safety guarantee. If T is
-// copyable, use the const T& overload, otherwise pass a unique_ptr<T>.
-// Equality comparisons are made against the T provided and default to using
-// operator==. See the documentation for TestExceptionSafety if T doesn't have
-// operator== but the strong guarantee still makes sense for it.
+// Returns a functor to test for the strong exception-safety guarantee.
+// Equality comparisons are made against the T provided by the factory and
+// default to using operator==.
//
// Parameters:
-// * T: The type under test.
-template <typename T, typename EqualTo = std::equal_to<T>>
-exceptions_internal::StrongGuaranteeTester<T, EqualTo> StrongGuarantee(
- const T& t, EqualTo eq = EqualTo()) {
- return exceptions_internal::StrongGuaranteeTester<T, EqualTo>(
- absl::make_unique<T>(t), eq);
-}
-
-template <typename T, typename EqualTo = std::equal_to<T>>
-exceptions_internal::StrongGuaranteeTester<T, EqualTo> PointeeStrongGuarantee(
- std::unique_ptr<T> t_ptr, EqualTo eq = EqualTo()) {
- return exceptions_internal::StrongGuaranteeTester<T, EqualTo>(
- std::move(t_ptr), eq);
+// * TFactory: operator() returns a unique_ptr to the type under test. It
+// should always return pointers to values which compare equal.
+template <typename TFactory, typename EqualTo = std::equal_to<
+ exceptions_internal::FactoryType<TFactory>>>
+exceptions_internal::StrongGuaranteeTester<
+ exceptions_internal::FactoryType<TFactory>, EqualTo>
+StrongGuarantee(TFactory factory, EqualTo eq = EqualTo()) {
+ return exceptions_internal::StrongGuaranteeTester<
+ exceptions_internal::FactoryType<TFactory>, EqualTo>(factory(), eq);
}
} // namespace absl