1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
|
(************************************************************************)
(* v * The Coq Proof Assistant / The Coq Development Team *)
(* <O___,, * INRIA - CNRS - LIX - LRI - PPS - Copyright 1999-2012 *)
(* \VV/ **************************************************************)
(* // * This file is distributed under the terms of the *)
(* * GNU Lesser General Public License Version 2.1 *)
(************************************************************************)
(** Normalisation functions for rational numbers. *)
Require Export QArith_base.
Require Import Znumtheory.
Notation Z2P := Z.to_pos (compat "8.3").
Notation Z2P_correct := Z2Pos.id (compat "8.3").
(** Simplification of fractions using [Z.gcd].
This version can compute within Coq. *)
Definition Qred (q:Q) :=
let (q1,q2) := q in
let (r1,r2) := snd (Z.ggcd q1 ('q2))
in r1#(Z.to_pos r2).
Lemma Qred_correct : forall q, (Qred q) == q.
Proof.
unfold Qred, Qeq; intros (n,d); simpl.
generalize (Z.ggcd_gcd n ('d)) (Z.gcd_nonneg n ('d))
(Z.ggcd_correct_divisors n ('d)).
destruct (Z.ggcd n (Zpos d)) as (g,(nn,dd)); simpl.
Open Scope Z_scope.
intros Hg LE (Hn,Hd). rewrite Hd, Hn.
rewrite <- Hg in LE; clear Hg.
assert (0 <> g) by (intro; subst; discriminate).
rewrite Z2Pos.id. ring.
rewrite <- (Z.mul_pos_cancel_l g); [now rewrite <- Hd | omega].
Close Scope Z_scope.
Qed.
Lemma Qred_complete : forall p q, p==q -> Qred p = Qred q.
Proof.
intros (a,b) (c,d).
unfold Qred, Qeq in *; simpl in *.
Open Scope Z_scope.
intros H.
generalize (Z.ggcd_gcd a ('b)) (Zgcd_is_gcd a ('b))
(Z.gcd_nonneg a ('b)) (Z.ggcd_correct_divisors a ('b)).
destruct (Z.ggcd a (Zpos b)) as (g,(aa,bb)).
simpl. intros <- Hg1 Hg2 (Hg3,Hg4).
assert (Hg0 : g <> 0) by (intro; now subst g).
generalize (Z.ggcd_gcd c ('d)) (Zgcd_is_gcd c ('d))
(Z.gcd_nonneg c ('d)) (Z.ggcd_correct_divisors c ('d)).
destruct (Z.ggcd c (Zpos d)) as (g',(cc,dd)).
simpl. intros <- Hg'1 Hg'2 (Hg'3,Hg'4).
assert (Hg'0 : g' <> 0) by (intro; now subst g').
elim (rel_prime_cross_prod aa bb cc dd).
- congruence.
- (*rel_prime*)
constructor.
* exists aa; auto with zarith.
* exists bb; auto with zarith.
* intros x Ha Hb.
destruct Hg1 as (Hg11,Hg12,Hg13).
destruct (Hg13 (g*x)) as (x',Hx).
{ rewrite Hg3.
destruct Ha as (xa,Hxa); exists xa; rewrite Hxa; ring. }
{ rewrite Hg4.
destruct Hb as (xb,Hxb); exists xb; rewrite Hxb; ring. }
exists x'.
apply Z.mul_reg_l with g; auto. rewrite Hx at 1; ring.
- (* rel_prime *)
constructor.
* exists cc; auto with zarith.
* exists dd; auto with zarith.
* intros x Hc Hd.
inversion Hg'1 as (Hg'11,Hg'12,Hg'13).
destruct (Hg'13 (g'*x)) as (x',Hx).
{ rewrite Hg'3.
destruct Hc as (xc,Hxc); exists xc; rewrite Hxc; ring. }
{ rewrite Hg'4.
destruct Hd as (xd,Hxd); exists xd; rewrite Hxd; ring. }
exists x'.
apply Z.mul_reg_l with g'; auto. rewrite Hx at 1; ring.
- apply Z.lt_gt.
rewrite <- (Z.mul_pos_cancel_l g); [now rewrite <- Hg4 | omega].
- apply Z.lt_gt.
rewrite <- (Z.mul_pos_cancel_l g'); [now rewrite <- Hg'4 | omega].
- apply Z.mul_reg_l with (g*g').
* rewrite Z.mul_eq_0. now destruct 1.
* rewrite Z.mul_shuffle1, <- Hg3, <- Hg'4.
now rewrite Z.mul_shuffle1, <- Hg'3, <- Hg4, H, Z.mul_comm.
Close Scope Z_scope.
Qed.
Add Morphism Qred : Qred_comp.
Proof.
intros q q' H.
rewrite (Qred_correct q); auto.
rewrite (Qred_correct q'); auto.
Qed.
Definition Qplus' (p q : Q) := Qred (Qplus p q).
Definition Qmult' (p q : Q) := Qred (Qmult p q).
Definition Qminus' x y := Qred (Qminus x y).
Lemma Qplus'_correct : forall p q : Q, (Qplus' p q)==(Qplus p q).
Proof.
intros; unfold Qplus'; apply Qred_correct; auto.
Qed.
Lemma Qmult'_correct : forall p q : Q, (Qmult' p q)==(Qmult p q).
Proof.
intros; unfold Qmult'; apply Qred_correct; auto.
Qed.
Lemma Qminus'_correct : forall p q : Q, (Qminus' p q)==(Qminus p q).
Proof.
intros; unfold Qminus'; apply Qred_correct; auto.
Qed.
Add Morphism Qplus' : Qplus'_comp.
Proof.
intros; unfold Qplus'.
rewrite H, H0; auto with qarith.
Qed.
Add Morphism Qmult' : Qmult'_comp.
Proof.
intros; unfold Qmult'.
rewrite H, H0; auto with qarith.
Qed.
Add Morphism Qminus' : Qminus'_comp.
Proof.
intros; unfold Qminus'.
rewrite H, H0; auto with qarith.
Qed.
Lemma Qred_opp: forall q, Qred (-q) = - (Qred q).
Proof.
intros (x, y); unfold Qred; simpl.
rewrite Z.ggcd_opp; case Z.ggcd; intros p1 (p2, p3); simpl.
unfold Qopp; auto.
Qed.
Theorem Qred_compare: forall x y,
Qcompare x y = Qcompare (Qred x) (Qred y).
Proof.
intros x y; apply Qcompare_comp; apply Qeq_sym; apply Qred_correct.
Qed.
|