1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
|
(************************************************************************)
(* v * The Coq Proof Assistant / The Coq Development Team *)
(* <O___,, * INRIA - CNRS - LIX - LRI - PPS - Copyright 1999-2017 *)
(* \VV/ **************************************************************)
(* // * This file is distributed under the terms of the *)
(* * GNU Lesser General Public License Version 2.1 *)
(************************************************************************)
(* Evgeny Makarov, INRIA, 2007 *)
(************************************************************************)
Require Export NZAxioms.
Require Import ZArith.
Require Import Zpow_facts.
Require Import DoubleType.
Require Import CyclicAxioms.
(** * From [CyclicType] to [NZAxiomsSig] *)
(** A [Z/nZ] representation given by a module type [CyclicType]
implements [NZAxiomsSig], e.g. the common properties between
N and Z with no ordering. Notice that the [n] in [Z/nZ] is
a power of 2.
*)
Module NZCyclicAxiomsMod (Import Cyclic : CyclicType) <: NZAxiomsSig.
Local Open Scope Z_scope.
Local Notation wB := (base ZnZ.digits).
Local Notation "[| x |]" := (ZnZ.to_Z x) (at level 0, x at level 99).
Definition eq (n m : t) := [| n |] = [| m |].
Definition zero := ZnZ.zero.
Definition one := ZnZ.one.
Definition two := ZnZ.succ ZnZ.one.
Definition succ := ZnZ.succ.
Definition pred := ZnZ.pred.
Definition add := ZnZ.add.
Definition sub := ZnZ.sub.
Definition mul := ZnZ.mul.
Local Infix "==" := eq (at level 70).
Local Notation "0" := zero.
Local Notation S := succ.
Local Notation P := pred.
Local Infix "+" := add.
Local Infix "-" := sub.
Local Infix "*" := mul.
Hint Rewrite ZnZ.spec_0 ZnZ.spec_1 ZnZ.spec_succ ZnZ.spec_pred
ZnZ.spec_add ZnZ.spec_mul ZnZ.spec_sub : cyclic.
Ltac zify :=
unfold eq, zero, one, two, succ, pred, add, sub, mul in *;
autorewrite with cyclic.
Ltac zcongruence := repeat red; intros; zify; congruence.
Instance eq_equiv : Equivalence eq.
Proof.
unfold eq. firstorder.
Qed.
Local Obligation Tactic := zcongruence.
Program Instance succ_wd : Proper (eq ==> eq) succ.
Program Instance pred_wd : Proper (eq ==> eq) pred.
Program Instance add_wd : Proper (eq ==> eq ==> eq) add.
Program Instance sub_wd : Proper (eq ==> eq ==> eq) sub.
Program Instance mul_wd : Proper (eq ==> eq ==> eq) mul.
Theorem gt_wB_1 : 1 < wB.
Proof.
unfold base. apply Zpower_gt_1; unfold Z.lt; auto with zarith.
Qed.
Theorem gt_wB_0 : 0 < wB.
Proof.
pose proof gt_wB_1; auto with zarith.
Qed.
Lemma one_mod_wB : 1 mod wB = 1.
Proof.
rewrite Zmod_small. reflexivity. split. auto with zarith. apply gt_wB_1.
Qed.
Lemma succ_mod_wB : forall n : Z, (n + 1) mod wB = ((n mod wB) + 1) mod wB.
Proof.
intro n. rewrite <- one_mod_wB at 2. now rewrite <- Zplus_mod.
Qed.
Lemma pred_mod_wB : forall n : Z, (n - 1) mod wB = ((n mod wB) - 1) mod wB.
Proof.
intro n. rewrite <- one_mod_wB at 2. now rewrite Zminus_mod.
Qed.
Lemma NZ_to_Z_mod : forall n, [| n |] mod wB = [| n |].
Proof.
intro n; rewrite Zmod_small. reflexivity. apply ZnZ.spec_to_Z.
Qed.
Theorem pred_succ : forall n, P (S n) == n.
Proof.
intro n. zify.
rewrite <- pred_mod_wB.
replace ([| n |] + 1 - 1)%Z with [| n |] by ring. apply NZ_to_Z_mod.
Qed.
Theorem one_succ : one == succ zero.
Proof.
zify; simpl Z.add. now rewrite one_mod_wB.
Qed.
Theorem two_succ : two == succ one.
Proof.
reflexivity.
Qed.
Section Induction.
Variable A : t -> Prop.
Hypothesis A_wd : Proper (eq ==> iff) A.
Hypothesis A0 : A 0.
Hypothesis AS : forall n, A n <-> A (S n).
(* Below, we use only -> direction *)
Let B (n : Z) := A (ZnZ.of_Z n).
Lemma B0 : B 0.
Proof.
unfold B. apply A0.
Qed.
Lemma BS : forall n : Z, 0 <= n -> n < wB - 1 -> B n -> B (n + 1).
Proof.
intros n H1 H2 H3.
unfold B in *. apply AS in H3.
setoid_replace (ZnZ.of_Z (n + 1)) with (S (ZnZ.of_Z n)). assumption.
zify.
rewrite 2 ZnZ.of_Z_correct; auto with zarith.
symmetry; apply Zmod_small; auto with zarith.
Qed.
Theorem Zbounded_induction :
(forall Q : Z -> Prop, forall b : Z,
Q 0 ->
(forall n, 0 <= n -> n < b - 1 -> Q n -> Q (n + 1)) ->
forall n, 0 <= n -> n < b -> Q n)%Z.
Proof.
intros Q b Q0 QS.
set (Q' := fun n => (n < b /\ Q n) \/ (b <= n)).
assert (H : forall n, 0 <= n -> Q' n).
apply natlike_rec2; unfold Q'.
destruct (Z.le_gt_cases b 0) as [H | H]. now right. left; now split.
intros n H IH. destruct IH as [[IH1 IH2] | IH].
destruct (Z.le_gt_cases (b - 1) n) as [H1 | H1].
right; auto with zarith.
left. split; [auto with zarith | now apply (QS n)].
right; auto with zarith.
unfold Q' in *; intros n H1 H2. destruct (H n H1) as [[H3 H4] | H3].
assumption. now apply Z.le_ngt in H3.
Qed.
Lemma B_holds : forall n : Z, 0 <= n < wB -> B n.
Proof.
intros n [H1 H2].
apply Zbounded_induction with wB.
apply B0. apply BS. assumption. assumption.
Qed.
Theorem bi_induction : forall n, A n.
Proof.
intro n. setoid_replace n with (ZnZ.of_Z (ZnZ.to_Z n)).
apply B_holds. apply ZnZ.spec_to_Z.
red. symmetry. apply ZnZ.of_Z_correct.
apply ZnZ.spec_to_Z.
Qed.
End Induction.
Theorem add_0_l : forall n, 0 + n == n.
Proof.
intro n. zify.
rewrite Z.add_0_l. apply Zmod_small. apply ZnZ.spec_to_Z.
Qed.
Theorem add_succ_l : forall n m, (S n) + m == S (n + m).
Proof.
intros n m. zify.
rewrite succ_mod_wB. repeat rewrite Zplus_mod_idemp_l; try apply gt_wB_0.
rewrite <- (Z.add_assoc ([| n |] mod wB) 1 [| m |]). rewrite Zplus_mod_idemp_l.
rewrite (Z.add_comm 1 [| m |]); now rewrite Z.add_assoc.
Qed.
Theorem sub_0_r : forall n, n - 0 == n.
Proof.
intro n. zify. rewrite Z.sub_0_r. apply NZ_to_Z_mod.
Qed.
Theorem sub_succ_r : forall n m, n - (S m) == P (n - m).
Proof.
intros n m. zify. rewrite Zminus_mod_idemp_r, Zminus_mod_idemp_l.
now replace ([|n|] - ([|m|] + 1))%Z with ([|n|] - [|m|] - 1)%Z
by ring.
Qed.
Theorem mul_0_l : forall n, 0 * n == 0.
Proof.
intro n. now zify.
Qed.
Theorem mul_succ_l : forall n m, (S n) * m == n * m + m.
Proof.
intros n m. zify. rewrite Zplus_mod_idemp_l, Zmult_mod_idemp_l.
now rewrite Z.mul_add_distr_r, Z.mul_1_l.
Qed.
Definition t := t.
End NZCyclicAxiomsMod.
|
