path: root/theories/NArith/BinPos.v

(************************************************************************)
(*  v      *   The Coq Proof Assistant  /  The Coq Development Team     *)
(* <O___,, * CNRS-Ecole Polytechnique-INRIA Futurs-Universite Paris Sud *)
(*   \VV/  **************************************************************)
(*    //   *      This file is distributed under the terms of the       *)
(*         *       GNU Lesser General Public License Version 2.1        *)
(************************************************************************)

(*i $Id$ i*)

Unset Boxed Definitions.

(**********************************************************************)
(** Binary positive numbers *)

(** Original development by Pierre Crégut, CNET, Lannion, France *)

Inductive positive : Set :=
  | xI : positive -> positive
  | xO : positive -> positive
  | xH : positive.

(** Declare binding key for scope positive_scope *)

Delimit Scope positive_scope with positive.

(** Automatically open scope positive_scope for type positive, xO and xI *)

Bind Scope positive_scope with positive.
Arguments Scope xO [positive_scope].
Arguments Scope xI [positive_scope].

(** Successor *)

Fixpoint Psucc (x:positive) : positive :=
  match x with
  | xI x' => xO (Psucc x')
  | xO x' => xI x'
  | xH => xO xH
  end.

(** Addition *)

Set Boxed Definitions.

Fixpoint Pplus (x y:positive) {struct x} : positive :=
  match x, y with
  | xI x', xI y' => xO (Pplus_carry x' y')
  | xI x', xO y' => xI (Pplus x' y')
  | xI x', xH => xO (Psucc x')
  | xO x', xI y' => xI (Pplus x' y')
  | xO x', xO y' => xO (Pplus x' y')
  | xO x', xH => xI x'
  | xH, xI y' => xO (Psucc y')
  | xH, xO y' => xI y'
  | xH, xH => xO xH
  end
 
 with Pplus_carry (x y:positive) {struct x} : positive :=
  match x, y with
  | xI x', xI y' => xI (Pplus_carry x' y')
  | xI x', xO y' => xO (Pplus_carry x' y')
  | xI x', xH => xI (Psucc x')
  | xO x', xI y' => xO (Pplus_carry x' y')
  | xO x', xO y' => xI (Pplus x' y')
  | xO x', xH => xO (Psucc x')
  | xH, xI y' => xI (Psucc y')
  | xH, xO y' => xO (Psucc y')
  | xH, xH => xI xH
  end.

Unset Boxed Definitions.

Infix "+" := Pplus : positive_scope.

Open Local Scope positive_scope.

(** From binary positive numbers to Peano natural numbers *)

Fixpoint Pmult_nat (x:positive) (pow2:nat) {struct x} : nat :=
  match x with
  | xI x' => (pow2 + Pmult_nat x' (pow2 + pow2))%nat
  | xO x' => Pmult_nat x' (pow2 + pow2)%nat
  | xH => pow2
  end.

Definition nat_of_P (x:positive) := Pmult_nat x 1.

(** From Peano natural numbers to binary positive numbers *)

Fixpoint P_of_succ_nat (n:nat) : positive :=
  match n with
  | O => xH
  | S x' => Psucc (P_of_succ_nat x')
  end.

(** Operation x -> 2*x-1 *)

Fixpoint Pdouble_minus_one (x:positive) : positive :=
  match x with
  | xI x' => xI (xO x')
  | xO x' => xI (Pdouble_minus_one x')
  | xH => xH
  end.

(** Predecessor *)

Definition Ppred (x:positive) :=
  match x with
  | xI x' => xO x'
  | xO x' => Pdouble_minus_one x'
  | xH => xH
  end.

(** An auxiliary type for subtraction *)

Inductive positive_mask : Set :=
  | IsNul : positive_mask
  | IsPos : positive -> positive_mask
  | IsNeg : positive_mask.

(** Operation x -> 2*x+1 *)

Definition Pdouble_plus_one_mask (x:positive_mask) :=
  match x with
  | IsNul => IsPos xH
  | IsNeg => IsNeg
  | IsPos p => IsPos (xI p)
  end.

(** Operation x -> 2*x *)

Definition Pdouble_mask (x:positive_mask) :=
  match x with
  | IsNul => IsNul
  | IsNeg => IsNeg
  | IsPos p => IsPos (xO p)
  end.

(** Operation x -> 2*x-2 *)

Definition Pdouble_minus_two (x:positive) :=
  match x with
  | xI x' => IsPos (xO (xO x'))
  | xO x' => IsPos (xO (Pdouble_minus_one x'))
  | xH => IsNul
  end.

(** Subtraction of binary positive numbers into a positive numbers mask *)

Fixpoint Pminus_mask (x y:positive) {struct y} : positive_mask :=
  match x, y with
  | xI x', xI y' => Pdouble_mask (Pminus_mask x' y')
  | xI x', xO y' => Pdouble_plus_one_mask (Pminus_mask x' y')
  | xI x', xH => IsPos (xO x')
  | xO x', xI y' => Pdouble_plus_one_mask (Pminus_mask_carry x' y')
  | xO x', xO y' => Pdouble_mask (Pminus_mask x' y')
  | xO x', xH => IsPos (Pdouble_minus_one x')
  | xH, xH => IsNul
  | xH, _ => IsNeg
  end
 
 with Pminus_mask_carry (x y:positive) {struct y} : positive_mask :=
  match x, y with
  | xI x', xI y' => Pdouble_plus_one_mask (Pminus_mask_carry x' y')
  | xI x', xO y' => Pdouble_mask (Pminus_mask x' y')
  | xI x', xH => IsPos (Pdouble_minus_one x')
  | xO x', xI y' => Pdouble_mask (Pminus_mask_carry x' y')
  | xO x', xO y' => Pdouble_plus_one_mask (Pminus_mask_carry x' y')
  | xO x', xH => Pdouble_minus_two x'
  | xH, _ => IsNeg
  end.

(** Subtraction of binary positive numbers x and y, returns 1 if x<=y *)

Definition Pminus (x y:positive) :=
  match Pminus_mask x y with
  | IsPos z => z
  | _ => xH
  end.

Infix "-" := Pminus : positive_scope.

(** Multiplication on binary positive numbers *)

Fixpoint Pmult (x y:positive) {struct x} : positive :=
  match x with
  | xI x' => y + xO (Pmult x' y)
  | xO x' => xO (Pmult x' y)
  | xH => y
  end.

Infix "*" := Pmult : positive_scope.

(** Division by 2 rounded below but for 1 *)

Definition Pdiv2 (z:positive) :=
  match z with
  | xH => xH
  | xO p => p
  | xI p => p
  end.

Infix "/" := Pdiv2 : positive_scope.

(** Comparison on binary positive numbers *)

Fixpoint Pcompare (x y:positive) (r:comparison) {struct y} : comparison :=
  match x, y with
  | xI x', xI y' => Pcompare x' y' r
  | xI x', xO y' => Pcompare x' y' Gt
  | xI x', xH => Gt
  | xO x', xI y' => Pcompare x' y' Lt
  | xO x', xO y' => Pcompare x' y' r
  | xO x', xH => Gt
  | xH, xI y' => Lt
  | xH, xO y' => Lt
  | xH, xH => r
  end.

Infix "?=" := Pcompare (at level 70, no associativity) : positive_scope.

(**********************************************************************)
(** Miscellaneous properties of binary positive numbers *)

Lemma ZL11 : forall p:positive, p = xH \/ p <> xH.
Proof.
intros x; case x; intros; (left; reflexivity) || (right; discriminate).
Qed.

(**********************************************************************)
(** Properties of successor on binary positive numbers *)

(** Specification of [xI] in term of [Psucc] and [xO] *)

Lemma xI_succ_xO : forall p:positive, xI p = Psucc (xO p).
Proof.
reflexivity.
Qed.

Lemma Psucc_discr : forall p:positive, p <> Psucc p.
Proof.
intro x; destruct x as [p| p| ]; discriminate.
Qed.

(** Successor and double *)

Lemma Psucc_o_double_minus_one_eq_xO :
 forall p:positive, Psucc (Pdouble_minus_one p) = xO p.
Proof.
intro x; induction x as [x IHx| x| ]; simpl in |- *; try rewrite IHx;
 reflexivity.
Qed.

Lemma Pdouble_minus_one_o_succ_eq_xI :
 forall p:positive, Pdouble_minus_one (Psucc p) = xI p.
Proof.
intro x; induction x as [x IHx| x| ]; simpl in |- *; try rewrite IHx;
 reflexivity.
Qed.

Lemma xO_succ_permute :
 forall p:positive, xO (Psucc p) = Psucc (Psucc (xO p)).
Proof.
intro y; induction  y as [y Hrecy| y Hrecy| ]; simpl in |- *; auto.
Qed.

Lemma double_moins_un_xO_discr :
 forall p:positive, Pdouble_minus_one p <> xO p.
Proof.
intro x; destruct x as [p| p| ]; discriminate.
Qed.

(** Successor and predecessor *)

Lemma Psucc_not_one : forall p:positive, Psucc p <> xH.
Proof.
intro x; destruct x as [x| x| ]; discriminate.
Qed.

Lemma Ppred_succ : forall p:positive, Ppred (Psucc p) = p.
Proof.
intro x; destruct x as [p| p| ]; [ idtac | idtac | simpl in |- *; auto ];
 (induction p as [p IHp| | ]; [ idtac | reflexivity | reflexivity ]);
 simpl in |- *; simpl in IHp; try rewrite <- IHp; reflexivity.
Qed.

Lemma Psucc_pred : forall p:positive, p = xH \/ Psucc (Ppred p) = p.
Proof.
intro x; induction  x as [x Hrecx| x Hrecx| ];
 [ simpl in |- *; auto
 | simpl in |- *; intros; right; apply Psucc_o_double_minus_one_eq_xO
 | auto ].
Qed.

(** Injectivity of successor *)

Lemma Psucc_inj : forall p q:positive, Psucc p = Psucc q -> p = q.
Proof.
intro x; induction x; intro y; destruct y as [y| y| ]; simpl in |- *; intro H;
 discriminate H || (try (injection H; clear H; intro H)).
rewrite (IHx y H); reflexivity.
absurd (Psucc x = xH); [ apply Psucc_not_one | assumption ].
apply f_equal with (1 := H); assumption.
absurd (Psucc y = xH);
 [ apply Psucc_not_one | symmetry  in |- *; assumption ].
reflexivity.
Qed.

(**********************************************************************)
(** Properties of addition on binary positive numbers *)

(** Specification of [Psucc] in term of [Pplus] *)

Lemma Pplus_one_succ_r : forall p:positive, Psucc p = p + xH.
Proof.
intro q; destruct q as [p| p| ]; reflexivity.
Qed.

Lemma Pplus_one_succ_l : forall p:positive, Psucc p = xH + p.
Proof.
intro q; destruct q as [p| p| ]; reflexivity.
Qed.

(** Specification of [Pplus_carry] *)

Theorem Pplus_carry_spec :
 forall p q:positive, Pplus_carry p q = Psucc (p + q).
Proof.
intro x; induction x as [p IHp| p IHp| ]; intro y;
 [ destruct y as [p0| p0| ]
 | destruct y as [p0| p0| ]
 | destruct y as [p| p| ] ]; simpl in |- *; auto; rewrite IHp; 
 auto.
Qed.

(** Commutativity *)

Theorem Pplus_comm : forall p q:positive, p + q = q + p.
Proof.
intro x; induction x as [p IHp| p IHp| ]; intro y;
 [ destruct y as [p0| p0| ]
 | destruct y as [p0| p0| ]
 | destruct y as [p| p| ] ]; simpl in |- *; auto;
 try do 2 rewrite Pplus_carry_spec; rewrite IHp; auto.
Qed. 

(** Permutation of [Pplus] and [Psucc] *)

Theorem Pplus_succ_permute_r :
 forall p q:positive, p + Psucc q = Psucc (p + q).
Proof.
intro x; induction x as [p IHp| p IHp| ]; intro y;
 [ destruct y as [p0| p0| ]
 | destruct y as [p0| p0| ]
 | destruct y as [p| p| ] ]; simpl in |- *; auto;
 [ rewrite Pplus_carry_spec; rewrite IHp; auto
 | rewrite Pplus_carry_spec; auto
 | destruct p; simpl in |- *; auto
 | rewrite IHp; auto
 | destruct p; simpl in |- *; auto ].
Qed.

Theorem Pplus_succ_permute_l :
 forall p q:positive, Psucc p + q = Psucc (p + q).
Proof.
intros x y; rewrite Pplus_comm; rewrite Pplus_comm with (p := x);
 apply Pplus_succ_permute_r.
Qed.

Theorem Pplus_carry_pred_eq_plus :
 forall p q:positive, q <> xH -> Pplus_carry p (Ppred q) = p + q.
Proof.
intros q z H; elim (Psucc_pred z);
 [ intro; absurd (z = xH); auto
 | intros E; pattern z at 2 in |- *; rewrite <- E;
    rewrite Pplus_succ_permute_r; rewrite Pplus_carry_spec; 
    trivial ].
Qed. 

(** No neutral for addition on strictly positive numbers *)

Lemma Pplus_no_neutral : forall p q:positive, q + p <> p.
Proof.
intro x; induction x; intro y; destruct y as [y| y| ]; simpl in |- *; intro H;
 discriminate H || injection H; clear H; intro H; apply (IHx y H).
Qed.

Lemma Pplus_carry_no_neutral :
 forall p q:positive, Pplus_carry q p <> Psucc p.
Proof.
intros x y H; absurd (y + x = x);
 [ apply Pplus_no_neutral
 | apply Psucc_inj; rewrite <- Pplus_carry_spec; assumption ].
Qed.

(** Simplification *)

Lemma Pplus_carry_plus :
 forall p q r s:positive, Pplus_carry p r = Pplus_carry q s -> p + r = q + s.
Proof.
intros x y z t H; apply Psucc_inj; do 2 rewrite <- Pplus_carry_spec;
 assumption.
Qed.

Lemma Pplus_reg_r : forall p q r:positive, p + r = q + r -> p = q.
Proof.
intros x y z; generalize x y; clear x y.
induction z as [z| z| ].
  destruct x as [x| x| ]; intro y; destruct y as [y| y| ]; simpl in |- *;
   intro H; discriminate H || (try (injection H; clear H; intro H)).
    rewrite IHz with (1 := Pplus_carry_plus _ _ _ _ H); reflexivity.
    absurd (Pplus_carry x z = Psucc z);
     [ apply Pplus_carry_no_neutral | assumption ].
    rewrite IHz with (1 := H); reflexivity.
    symmetry  in H; absurd (Pplus_carry y z = Psucc z);
     [ apply Pplus_carry_no_neutral | assumption ].
    reflexivity.
  destruct x as [x| x| ]; intro y; destruct y as [y| y| ]; simpl in |- *;
   intro H; discriminate H || (try (injection H; clear H; intro H)).
    rewrite IHz with (1 := H); reflexivity.
    absurd (x + z = z); [ apply Pplus_no_neutral | assumption ].
    rewrite IHz with (1 := H); reflexivity.
    symmetry  in H; absurd (y + z = z);
     [ apply Pplus_no_neutral | assumption ].
    reflexivity.
  intros H x y; apply Psucc_inj; do 2 rewrite Pplus_one_succ_r; assumption.
Qed.

Lemma Pplus_reg_l : forall p q r:positive, p + q = p + r -> q = r.
Proof.
intros x y z H; apply Pplus_reg_r with (r := x);
 rewrite Pplus_comm with (p := z); rewrite Pplus_comm with (p := y);
 assumption.
Qed.

Lemma Pplus_carry_reg_r :
 forall p q r:positive, Pplus_carry p r = Pplus_carry q r -> p = q.
Proof.
intros x y z H; apply Pplus_reg_r with (r := z); apply Pplus_carry_plus;
 assumption.
Qed.

Lemma Pplus_carry_reg_l :
 forall p q r:positive, Pplus_carry p q = Pplus_carry p r -> q = r.
Proof.
intros x y z H; apply Pplus_reg_r with (r := x);
 rewrite Pplus_comm with (p := z); rewrite Pplus_comm with (p := y);
 apply Pplus_carry_plus; assumption.
Qed.

(** Addition on positive is associative *)

Theorem Pplus_assoc : forall p q r:positive, p + (q + r) = p + q + r.
Proof.
intros x y; generalize x; clear x.
induction y as [y| y| ]; intro x.
  destruct x as [x| x| ]; intro z; destruct z as [z| z| ]; simpl in |- *;
   repeat rewrite Pplus_carry_spec; repeat rewrite Pplus_succ_permute_r;
   repeat rewrite Pplus_succ_permute_l;
   reflexivity || (repeat apply f_equal with (A := positive)); 
   apply IHy.
  destruct x as [x| x| ]; intro z; destruct z as [z| z| ]; simpl in |- *;
   repeat rewrite Pplus_carry_spec; repeat rewrite Pplus_succ_permute_r;
   repeat rewrite Pplus_succ_permute_l;
   reflexivity || (repeat apply f_equal with (A := positive)); 
   apply IHy.
  intro z; rewrite Pplus_comm with (p := xH);
   do 2 rewrite <- Pplus_one_succ_r; rewrite Pplus_succ_permute_l;
   rewrite Pplus_succ_permute_r; reflexivity.
Qed.

(** Commutation of addition with the double of a positive number *)

Lemma Pplus_xI_double_minus_one :
 forall p q:positive, xO (p + q) = xI p + Pdouble_minus_one q.
Proof.
intros; change (xI p) with (xO p + xH) in |- *.
rewrite <- Pplus_assoc; rewrite <- Pplus_one_succ_l;
 rewrite Psucc_o_double_minus_one_eq_xO.
reflexivity.
Qed.

Lemma Pplus_xO_double_minus_one :
 forall p q:positive, Pdouble_minus_one (p + q) = xO p + Pdouble_minus_one q.
Proof.
induction p as [p IHp| p IHp| ]; destruct q as [q| q| ]; simpl in |- *;
 try rewrite Pplus_carry_spec; try rewrite Pdouble_minus_one_o_succ_eq_xI;
 try rewrite IHp; try rewrite Pplus_xI_double_minus_one; 
 try reflexivity.
 rewrite <- Psucc_o_double_minus_one_eq_xO; rewrite Pplus_one_succ_l;
  reflexivity. 
Qed.

(** Misc *)

Lemma Pplus_diag : forall p:positive, p + p = xO p.
Proof.
intro x; induction x; simpl in |- *; try rewrite Pplus_carry_spec;
 try rewrite IHx; reflexivity.
Qed.

(**********************************************************************)
(** Peano induction on binary positive positive numbers *)

Fixpoint plus_iter (x y:positive) {struct x} : positive :=
  match x with
  | xH => Psucc y
  | xO x => plus_iter x (plus_iter x y)
  | xI x => plus_iter x (plus_iter x (Psucc y))
  end.

Lemma plus_iter_eq_plus : forall p q:positive, plus_iter p q = p + q.
Proof.
intro x; induction x as [p IHp| p IHp| ]; intro y;
 [ destruct y as [p0| p0| ]
 | destruct y as [p0| p0| ]
 | destruct y as [p| p| ] ]; simpl in |- *; reflexivity || (do 2 rewrite IHp);
 rewrite Pplus_assoc; rewrite Pplus_diag; try reflexivity.
rewrite Pplus_carry_spec; rewrite <- Pplus_succ_permute_r; reflexivity.
rewrite Pplus_one_succ_r; reflexivity.
Qed.

Lemma plus_iter_xO : forall p:positive, plus_iter p p = xO p.
Proof.
intro; rewrite <- Pplus_diag; apply plus_iter_eq_plus.
Qed.

Lemma plus_iter_xI : forall p:positive, Psucc (plus_iter p p) = xI p.
Proof.
intro; rewrite xI_succ_xO; rewrite <- Pplus_diag;
 apply (f_equal (A:=positive)); apply plus_iter_eq_plus.
Qed.

Lemma iterate_add :
 forall P:positive -> Type,
   (forall n:positive, P n -> P (Psucc n)) ->
   forall p q:positive, P q -> P (plus_iter p q).
Proof.
intros P H; induction p; simpl in |- *; intros.
apply IHp; apply IHp; apply H; assumption.
apply IHp; apply IHp; assumption.
apply H; assumption.
Defined.

(** Peano induction *)

Theorem Pind :
 forall P:positive -> Prop,
   P xH -> (forall n:positive, P n -> P (Psucc n)) -> forall p:positive, P p.
Proof.
intros P H1 Hsucc n; induction n.
rewrite <- plus_iter_xI; apply Hsucc; apply iterate_add; assumption.
rewrite <- plus_iter_xO; apply iterate_add; assumption.
assumption.
Qed.

(** Peano recursion *)

Definition Prec (A:Set) (a:A) (f:positive -> A -> A) : 
  positive -> A :=
  (fix Prec (p:positive) : A :=
     match p with
     | xH => a
     | xO p => iterate_add (fun _ => A) f p p (Prec p)
     | xI p => f (plus_iter p p) (iterate_add (fun _ => A) f p p (Prec p))
     end).

(** Peano case analysis *)

Theorem Pcase :
 forall P:positive -> Prop,
   P xH -> (forall n:positive, P (Psucc n)) -> forall p:positive, P p.
Proof.
intros; apply Pind; auto.
Qed.

(*
Check
  (let fact := Prec positive xH (fun p r => Psucc p * r) in
   let seven := xI (xI xH) in
   let five_thousand_forty :=
     xO (xO (xO (xO (xI (xI (xO (xI (xI (xI (xO (xO xH))))))))))) in
   refl_equal _:fact seven = five_thousand_forty).
*)

(**********************************************************************)
(** Properties of multiplication on binary positive numbers *)

(** One is right neutral for multiplication *)

Lemma Pmult_1_r : forall p:positive, p * xH = p.
Proof.
intro x; induction x; simpl in |- *.
  rewrite IHx; reflexivity.
  rewrite IHx; reflexivity.
  reflexivity.
Qed.

(** Right reduction properties for multiplication *)

Lemma Pmult_xO_permute_r : forall p q:positive, p * xO q = xO (p * q).
Proof.
intros x y; induction x; simpl in |- *.
  rewrite IHx; reflexivity.
  rewrite IHx; reflexivity.
  reflexivity.
Qed.

Lemma Pmult_xI_permute_r : forall p q:positive, p * xI q = p + xO (p * q).
Proof.
intros x y; induction x; simpl in |- *.
  rewrite IHx; do 2 rewrite Pplus_assoc; rewrite Pplus_comm with (p := y);
   reflexivity.
  rewrite IHx; reflexivity.
  reflexivity.
Qed.

(** Commutativity of multiplication *)

Theorem Pmult_comm : forall p q:positive, p * q = q * p.
Proof.
intros x y; induction y; simpl in |- *.
  rewrite <- IHy; apply Pmult_xI_permute_r.
  rewrite <- IHy; apply Pmult_xO_permute_r.
  apply Pmult_1_r.
Qed.

(** Distributivity of multiplication over addition *)

Theorem Pmult_plus_distr_l :
 forall p q r:positive, p * (q + r) = p * q + p * r.
Proof.
intros x y z; induction x; simpl in |- *.
  rewrite IHx; rewrite <- Pplus_assoc with (q := xO (x * y));
   rewrite Pplus_assoc with (p := xO (x * y));
   rewrite Pplus_comm with (p := xO (x * y));
   rewrite <- Pplus_assoc with (q := xO (x * y));
   rewrite Pplus_assoc with (q := z); reflexivity.
  rewrite IHx; reflexivity.
  reflexivity.
Qed.

Theorem Pmult_plus_distr_r :
 forall p q r:positive, (p + q) * r = p * r + q * r.
Proof.
intros x y z; do 3 rewrite Pmult_comm with (q := z); apply Pmult_plus_distr_l.
Qed.

(** Associativity of multiplication *)

Theorem Pmult_assoc : forall p q r:positive, p * (q * r) = p * q * r.
Proof.
intro x; induction x as [x| x| ]; simpl in |- *; intros y z.
  rewrite IHx; rewrite Pmult_plus_distr_r; reflexivity.
  rewrite IHx; reflexivity.
  reflexivity.
Qed.

(** Parity properties of multiplication *)

Lemma Pmult_xI_mult_xO_discr : forall p q r:positive, xI p * r <> xO q * r.
Proof.
intros x y z; induction z as [| z IHz| ]; try discriminate.
intro H; apply IHz; clear IHz.
do 2 rewrite Pmult_xO_permute_r in H.
injection H; clear H; intro H; exact H.
Qed.

Lemma Pmult_xO_discr : forall p q:positive, xO p * q <> q.
Proof.
intros x y; induction y; try discriminate.
rewrite Pmult_xO_permute_r; injection; assumption.
Qed.

(** Simplification properties of multiplication *)

Theorem Pmult_reg_r : forall p q r:positive, p * r = q * r -> p = q.
Proof.
intro x; induction x as [p IHp| p IHp| ]; intro y; destruct y as [q| q| ];
 intros z H; reflexivity || apply (f_equal (A:=positive)) || apply False_ind.
  simpl in H; apply IHp with (xO z); simpl in |- *;
   do 2 rewrite Pmult_xO_permute_r; apply Pplus_reg_l with (1 := H).
  apply Pmult_xI_mult_xO_discr with (1 := H).
  simpl in H; rewrite Pplus_comm in H; apply Pplus_no_neutral with (1 := H).
  symmetry  in H; apply Pmult_xI_mult_xO_discr with (1 := H).
  apply IHp with (xO z); simpl in |- *; do 2 rewrite Pmult_xO_permute_r;
   assumption.
  apply Pmult_xO_discr with (1 := H).
  simpl in H; symmetry  in H; rewrite Pplus_comm in H;
   apply Pplus_no_neutral with (1 := H).
  symmetry  in H; apply Pmult_xO_discr with (1 := H).
Qed.

Theorem Pmult_reg_l : forall p q r:positive, r * p = r * q -> p = q.
Proof.
intros x y z H; apply Pmult_reg_r with (r := z).
rewrite Pmult_comm with (p := x); rewrite Pmult_comm with (p := y);
 assumption.
Qed.

(** Inversion of multiplication *)

Lemma Pmult_1_inversion_l : forall p q:positive, p * q = xH -> p = xH.
Proof.
intros x y; destruct x as [p| p| ]; simpl in |- *.
 destruct y as [p0| p0| ]; intro; discriminate.
 intro; discriminate.
 reflexivity.
Qed.

(**********************************************************************)
(** Properties of comparison on binary positive numbers *)

Theorem Pcompare_not_Eq :
 forall p q:positive, (p ?= q) Gt <> Eq /\ (p ?= q) Lt <> Eq.
Proof.
intro x; induction x as [p IHp| p IHp| ]; intro y; destruct y as [q| q| ];
 split; simpl in |- *; auto; discriminate || (elim (IHp q); auto).
Qed.

Theorem Pcompare_Eq_eq : forall p q:positive, (p ?= q) Eq = Eq -> p = q.
Proof.
intro x; induction x as [p IHp| p IHp| ]; intro y; destruct y as [q| q| ];
 simpl in |- *; auto; intro H;
 [ rewrite (IHp q); trivial
 | absurd ((p ?= q) Gt = Eq);
    [ elim (Pcompare_not_Eq p q); auto | assumption ]
 | discriminate H
 | absurd ((p ?= q) Lt = Eq);
    [ elim (Pcompare_not_Eq p q); auto | assumption ]
 | rewrite (IHp q); auto
 | discriminate H
 | discriminate H
 | discriminate H ].
Qed.

Lemma Pcompare_Gt_Lt :
 forall p q:positive, (p ?= q) Gt = Lt -> (p ?= q) Eq = Lt.
Proof.
intro x; induction  x as [x Hrecx| x Hrecx| ]; intro y;
 [ induction  y as [y Hrecy| y Hrecy| ]
 | induction  y as [y Hrecy| y Hrecy| ]
 | induction  y as [y Hrecy| y Hrecy| ] ]; simpl in |- *; 
 auto; discriminate || intros H; discriminate H.
Qed.

Lemma Pcompare_Lt_Gt :
 forall p q:positive, (p ?= q) Lt = Gt -> (p ?= q) Eq = Gt.
Proof.
intro x; induction  x as [x Hrecx| x Hrecx| ]; intro y;
 [ induction  y as [y Hrecy| y Hrecy| ]
 | induction  y as [y Hrecy| y Hrecy| ]
 | induction  y as [y Hrecy| y Hrecy| ] ]; simpl in |- *; 
 auto; discriminate || intros H; discriminate H.
Qed.

Lemma Pcompare_Lt_Lt :
 forall p q:positive, (p ?= q) Lt = Lt -> (p ?= q) Eq = Lt \/ p = q.
Proof.
intro x; induction x as [p IHp| p IHp| ]; intro y; destruct y as [q| q| ];
 simpl in |- *; auto; try discriminate; intro H2; elim (IHp q H2); 
 auto; intros E; rewrite E; auto.
Qed.

Lemma Pcompare_Gt_Gt :
 forall p q:positive, (p ?= q) Gt = Gt -> (p ?= q) Eq = Gt \/ p = q.
Proof.
intro x; induction x as [p IHp| p IHp| ]; intro y; destruct y as [q| q| ];
 simpl in |- *; auto; try discriminate; intro H2; elim (IHp q H2); 
 auto; intros E; rewrite E; auto.
Qed.

Lemma Dcompare : forall r:comparison, r = Eq \/ r = Lt \/ r = Gt.
Proof.
simple induction r; auto. 
Qed.

Ltac ElimPcompare c1 c2 :=
  elim (Dcompare ((c1 ?= c2) Eq));
   [ idtac | let x := fresh "H" in
             (intro x; case x; clear x) ].

Theorem Pcompare_refl : forall p:positive, (p ?= p) Eq = Eq.
intro x; induction  x as [x Hrecx| x Hrecx| ]; auto.
Qed.

Lemma Pcompare_antisym :
 forall (p q:positive) (r:comparison),
   CompOpp ((p ?= q) r) = (q ?= p) (CompOpp r).
Proof.
intro x; induction x as [p IHp| p IHp| ]; intro y;
 [ destruct y as [p0| p0| ]
 | destruct y as [p0| p0| ]
 | destruct y as [p| p| ] ]; intro r;
 reflexivity ||
   (symmetry  in |- *; assumption) || discriminate H || simpl in |- *;
 apply IHp || (try rewrite IHp); try reflexivity.
Qed.

Lemma ZC1 : forall p q:positive, (p ?= q) Eq = Gt -> (q ?= p) Eq = Lt.
Proof.
intros; change Eq with (CompOpp Eq) in |- *.
rewrite <- Pcompare_antisym; rewrite H; reflexivity.
Qed.

Lemma ZC2 : forall p q:positive, (p ?= q) Eq = Lt -> (q ?= p) Eq = Gt.
Proof.
intros; change Eq with (CompOpp Eq) in |- *.
rewrite <- Pcompare_antisym; rewrite H; reflexivity.
Qed.

Lemma ZC3 : forall p q:positive, (p ?= q) Eq = Eq -> (q ?= p) Eq = Eq.
Proof.
intros; change Eq with (CompOpp Eq) in |- *.
rewrite <- Pcompare_antisym; rewrite H; reflexivity.
Qed.

Lemma ZC4 : forall p q:positive, (p ?= q) Eq = CompOpp ((q ?= p) Eq).
Proof.
intros; change Eq at 1 with (CompOpp Eq) in |- *.
symmetry  in |- *; apply Pcompare_antisym.
Qed.

(**********************************************************************)
(** Properties of subtraction on binary positive numbers *)

Lemma double_eq_zero_inversion :
 forall p:positive_mask, Pdouble_mask p = IsNul -> p = IsNul.
Proof.
destruct p; simpl in |- *; [ trivial | discriminate 1 | discriminate 1 ].
Qed.

Lemma double_plus_one_zero_discr :
 forall p:positive_mask, Pdouble_plus_one_mask p <> IsNul.
Proof.
simple induction p; intros; discriminate.
Qed.

Lemma double_plus_one_eq_one_inversion :
 forall p:positive_mask, Pdouble_plus_one_mask p = IsPos xH -> p = IsNul.
Proof.
destruct p; simpl in |- *; [ trivial | discriminate 1 | discriminate 1 ].
Qed.

Lemma double_eq_one_discr :
 forall p:positive_mask, Pdouble_mask p <> IsPos xH.
Proof.
simple induction p; intros; discriminate.
Qed.

Theorem Pminus_mask_diag : forall p:positive, Pminus_mask p p = IsNul.
Proof.
intro x; induction x as [p IHp| p IHp| ];
 [ simpl in |- *; rewrite IHp; simpl in |- *; trivial
 | simpl in |- *; rewrite IHp; auto
 | auto ].
Qed.

Lemma ZL10 :
 forall p q:positive,
   Pminus_mask p q = IsPos xH -> Pminus_mask_carry p q = IsNul.
Proof.
intro x; induction x as [p| p| ]; intro y; destruct y as [q| q| ];
 simpl in |- *; intro H; try discriminate H;
 [ absurd (Pdouble_mask (Pminus_mask p q) = IsPos xH);
    [ apply double_eq_one_discr | assumption ]
 | assert (Heq : Pminus_mask p q = IsNul);
    [ apply double_plus_one_eq_one_inversion; assumption
    | rewrite Heq; reflexivity ]
 | assert (Heq : Pminus_mask_carry p q = IsNul);
    [ apply double_plus_one_eq_one_inversion; assumption
    | rewrite Heq; reflexivity ]
 | absurd (Pdouble_mask (Pminus_mask p q) = IsPos xH);
    [ apply double_eq_one_discr | assumption ]
 | destruct p; simpl in |- *;
    [ discriminate H | discriminate H | reflexivity ] ].
Qed.

(** Properties of subtraction valid only for x>y *)

Lemma Pminus_mask_Gt :
 forall p q:positive,
   (p ?= q) Eq = Gt ->
    exists h : positive,
     Pminus_mask p q = IsPos h /\
     q + h = p /\ (h = xH \/ Pminus_mask_carry p q = IsPos (Ppred h)).
Proof.
intro x; induction x as [p| p| ]; intro y; destruct y as [q| q| ];
 simpl in |- *; intro H; try discriminate H.
  destruct (IHp q H) as [z [H4 [H6 H7]]]; exists (xO z); split.
    rewrite H4; reflexivity.
    split.
      simpl in |- *; rewrite H6; reflexivity.
      right; clear H6; destruct (ZL11 z) as [H8| H8];
       [ rewrite H8; rewrite H8 in H4; rewrite ZL10;
          [ reflexivity | assumption ]
       | clear H4; destruct H7 as [H9| H9];
          [ absurd (z = xH); assumption
          | rewrite H9; clear H9; destruct z as [p0| p0| ];
             [ reflexivity | reflexivity | absurd (xH = xH); trivial ] ] ].
  case Pcompare_Gt_Gt with (1 := H);
   [ intros H3; elim (IHp q H3); intros z H4; exists (xI z); elim H4;
      intros H5 H6; elim H6; intros H7 H8; split;
      [ simpl in |- *; rewrite H5; auto
      | split;
         [ simpl in |- *; rewrite H7; trivial
         | right;
            change (Pdouble_mask (Pminus_mask p q) = IsPos (Ppred (xI z)))
             in |- *; rewrite H5; auto ] ]
   | intros H3; exists xH; rewrite H3; split;
      [ simpl in |- *; rewrite Pminus_mask_diag; auto | split; auto ] ].
  exists (xO p); auto.
  destruct (IHp q) as [z [H4 [H6 H7]]].
    apply Pcompare_Lt_Gt; assumption.
    destruct (ZL11 z) as [vZ| ];
     [ exists xH; split;
        [ rewrite ZL10; [ reflexivity | rewrite vZ in H4; assumption ]
        | split;
           [ simpl in |- *; rewrite Pplus_one_succ_r; rewrite <- vZ;
              rewrite H6; trivial
           | auto ] ]
     | exists (xI (Ppred z)); destruct H7 as [| H8];
        [ absurd (z = xH); assumption
        | split;
           [ rewrite H8; trivial
           | split;
              [ simpl in |- *; rewrite Pplus_carry_pred_eq_plus;
                 [ rewrite H6; trivial | assumption ]
              | right; rewrite H8; reflexivity ] ] ] ].
  destruct (IHp q H) as [z [H4 [H6 H7]]].
  exists (xO z); split;
   [ rewrite H4; auto
   | split;
      [ simpl in |- *; rewrite H6; reflexivity
      | right;
         change
           (Pdouble_plus_one_mask (Pminus_mask_carry p q) =
            IsPos (Pdouble_minus_one z)) in |- *;
         destruct (ZL11 z) as [H8| H8];
         [ rewrite H8; simpl in |- *;
            assert (H9 : Pminus_mask_carry p q = IsNul);
            [ apply ZL10; rewrite <- H8; assumption
            | rewrite H9; reflexivity ]
         | destruct H7 as [H9| H9];
            [ absurd (z = xH); auto
            | rewrite H9; destruct z as [p0| p0| ]; simpl in |- *;
               [ reflexivity
               | reflexivity
               | absurd (xH = xH); [ assumption | reflexivity ] ] ] ] ] ].
  exists (Pdouble_minus_one p); split;
   [ reflexivity
   | clear IHp; split;
      [ destruct p; simpl in |- *;
         [ reflexivity
         | rewrite Psucc_o_double_minus_one_eq_xO; reflexivity
         | reflexivity ]
      | destruct p; [ right | right | left ]; reflexivity ] ].
Qed.

Theorem Pplus_minus :
 forall p q:positive, (p ?= q) Eq = Gt -> q + (p - q) = p.
Proof.
intros x y H; elim Pminus_mask_Gt with (1 := H); intros z H1; elim H1;
 intros H2 H3; elim H3; intros H4 H5; unfold Pminus in |- *; 
 rewrite H2; exact H4.
Qed.