1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
|
(************************************************************************)
(* v * The Coq Proof Assistant / The Coq Development Team *)
(* <O___,, * INRIA - CNRS - LIX - LRI - PPS - Copyright 1999-2010 *)
(* \VV/ **************************************************************)
(* // * This file is distributed under the terms of the *)
(* * GNU Lesser General Public License Version 2.1 *)
(************************************************************************)
(* Hurkens.v *)
(************************************************************************)
(** This is Hurkens paradox [Hurkens] in system U-, adapted by Herman
Geuvers [Geuvers] to show the inconsistency in the pure calculus of
constructions of a retract from Prop into a small type.
References:
- [Hurkens] A. J. Hurkens, "A simplification of Girard's paradox",
Proceedings of the 2nd international conference Typed Lambda-Calculi
and Applications (TLCA'95), 1995.
- [Geuvers] "Inconsistency of Classical Logic in Type Theory", 2001
(see http://www.cs.kun.nl/~herman/note.ps.gz).
*)
Section Paradox.
Variable bool : Prop.
Variable p2b : Prop -> bool.
Variable b2p : bool -> Prop.
Hypothesis p2p1 : forall A:Prop, b2p (p2b A) -> A.
Hypothesis p2p2 : forall A:Prop, A -> b2p (p2b A).
Variable B : Prop.
Definition V := forall A:Prop, ((A -> bool) -> A -> bool) -> A -> bool.
Definition U := V -> bool.
Definition sb (z:V) : V := fun A r a => r (z A r) a.
Definition le (i:U -> bool) (x:U) : bool :=
x (fun A r a => i (fun v => sb v A r a)).
Definition induct (i:U -> bool) : Prop :=
forall x:U, b2p (le i x) -> b2p (i x).
Definition WF : U := fun z => p2b (induct (z U le)).
Definition I (x:U) : Prop :=
(forall i:U -> bool, b2p (le i x) -> b2p (i (fun v => sb v U le x))) -> B.
Lemma Omega : forall i:U -> bool, induct i -> b2p (i WF).
Proof.
intros i y.
apply y.
unfold le, WF, induct in |- *.
apply p2p2.
intros x H0.
apply y.
exact H0.
Qed.
Lemma lemma1 : induct (fun u => p2b (I u)).
Proof.
unfold induct in |- *.
intros x p.
apply (p2p2 (I x)).
intro q.
apply (p2p1 (I (fun v:V => sb v U le x)) (q (fun u => p2b (I u)) p)).
intro i.
apply q with (i := fun y => i (fun v:V => sb v U le y)).
Qed.
Lemma lemma2 : (forall i:U -> bool, induct i -> b2p (i WF)) -> B.
Proof.
intro x.
apply (p2p1 (I WF) (x (fun u => p2b (I u)) lemma1)).
intros i H0.
apply (x (fun y => i (fun v => sb v U le y))).
apply (p2p1 _ H0).
Qed.
Theorem paradox : B.
Proof.
exact (lemma2 Omega).
Qed.
End Paradox.
|
