aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffhomepage
path: root/test-suite/output/Arguments.out
blob: a2ee2d4c8ed736cd5df9cd91bb8a1c9c1d238a2e (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
Nat.sub : nat -> nat -> nat

Argument scopes are [nat_scope nat_scope]
The reduction tactics unfold Nat.sub but avoid exposing match constructs
Nat.sub is transparent
Expands to: Constant Coq.Init.Nat.sub
Nat.sub : nat -> nat -> nat

Argument scopes are [nat_scope nat_scope]
The reduction tactics unfold Nat.sub when applied to 1 argument
  but avoid exposing match constructs
Nat.sub is transparent
Expands to: Constant Coq.Init.Nat.sub
Nat.sub : nat -> nat -> nat

Argument scopes are [nat_scope nat_scope]
The reduction tactics unfold Nat.sub
  when the 1st argument evaluates to a constructor and
  when applied to 1 argument but avoid exposing match constructs
Nat.sub is transparent
Expands to: Constant Coq.Init.Nat.sub
Nat.sub : nat -> nat -> nat

Argument scopes are [nat_scope nat_scope]
The reduction tactics unfold Nat.sub when the 1st and
  2nd arguments evaluate to a constructor and when applied to 2 arguments 
Nat.sub is transparent
Expands to: Constant Coq.Init.Nat.sub
Nat.sub : nat -> nat -> nat

Argument scopes are [nat_scope nat_scope]
The reduction tactics unfold Nat.sub when the 1st and
  2nd arguments evaluate to a constructor 
Nat.sub is transparent
Expands to: Constant Coq.Init.Nat.sub
pf :
forall D1 C1 : Type,
(D1 -> C1) -> forall D2 C2 : Type, (D2 -> C2) -> D1 * D2 -> C1 * C2

Arguments D2, C2 are implicit
Arguments D1, C1 are implicit and maximally inserted
Argument scopes are [foo_scope type_scope _ _ _ _ _]
The reduction tactics never unfold pf
pf is transparent
Expands to: Constant Top.pf
fcomp : forall A B C : Type, (B -> C) -> (A -> B) -> A -> C

Arguments A, B, C are implicit and maximally inserted
Argument scopes are [type_scope type_scope type_scope _ _ _]
The reduction tactics unfold fcomp when applied to 6 arguments 
fcomp is transparent
Expands to: Constant Top.fcomp
volatile : nat -> nat

Argument scope is [nat_scope]
The reduction tactics always unfold volatile
volatile is transparent
Expands to: Constant Top.volatile
f : T1 -> T2 -> nat -> unit -> nat -> nat

Argument scopes are [_ _ nat_scope _ nat_scope]
f is transparent
Expands to: Constant Top.S1.S2.f
f : T1 -> T2 -> nat -> unit -> nat -> nat

Argument scopes are [_ _ nat_scope _ nat_scope]
The reduction tactics unfold f when the 3rd, 4th and
  5th arguments evaluate to a constructor 
f is transparent
Expands to: Constant Top.S1.S2.f
f : forall T2 : Type, T1 -> T2 -> nat -> unit -> nat -> nat

Argument T2 is implicit
Argument scopes are [type_scope _ _ nat_scope _ nat_scope]
The reduction tactics unfold f when the 4th, 5th and
  6th arguments evaluate to a constructor 
f is transparent
Expands to: Constant Top.S1.f
f : forall T1 T2 : Type, T1 -> T2 -> nat -> unit -> nat -> nat

Arguments T1, T2 are implicit
Argument scopes are [type_scope type_scope _ _ nat_scope _ nat_scope]
The reduction tactics unfold f when the 5th, 6th and
  7th arguments evaluate to a constructor 
f is transparent
Expands to: Constant Top.f
     = forall v : unit, f 0 0 5 v 3 = 2
     : Prop
     = 2 = 2
     : Prop
f : forall T1 T2 : Type, T1 -> T2 -> nat -> unit -> nat -> nat

The reduction tactics unfold f when the 5th, 6th and
  7th arguments evaluate to a constructor 
f is transparent
Expands to: Constant Top.f
forall w : r, w 3 true = tt
     : Prop
The command has indeed failed with message:
Error: Unknown interpretation for notation "$".
w 3 true = tt
     : Prop
The command has indeed failed with message:
Error: Extra arguments: _, _.