aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffhomepage
path: root/tactics/pattern.mli
blob: afe1ec848e95b686fb6a01a0a3ce48cb5d028a87 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110

(* $Id$ *)

(*i*)
open Util
open Names
open Term
open Sign
open Evd
open Proof_trees
(*i*)

(* The pattern table for tactics. *)

(* The idea is that we want to write tactic files which are only
   "activated" when certain modules are loaded and imported.  Already,
   the question of how to store the tactics is hard, and we will not
   address that here.  However, the question arises of how to store
   the patterns that we will want to use for term-destructuring, and
   the solution proposed is that we will store patterns with a
   "module-marker", telling us which modules have to be open in order
   to use the pattern.  So we will write:
   \begin{verbatim}
   let mark = make_module_marker ["<module-name>";<module-name>;...];;
   let p1 = put_pat mark "<parseable pattern goes here>";;
   \end{verbatim}
   And now, we can use [(get p1)]
   to get the term which corresponds to this pattern, already parsed
   and with the global names adjusted.

   In other words, we will have the term which we would have had if we
   had done an:
   \begin{verbatim}
        constr_of_com mt_ctxt (initial_sign()) "<text here>"
   \end{verbatim}
   except that it will be computed at module-opening time, rather than
   at tactic-application time.  The ONLY difference will be that
   no implicit syntax resolution will happen. *)

(*s First part : introduction of term patterns *)

type module_mark = Stock.module_mark
type marked_term

val make_module_marker : string list -> module_mark
val put_pat            : module_mark -> string -> marked_term
val get_pat            : marked_term -> constr
val pattern_stock      : constr Stock.stock

val raw_sopattern_of_compattern : Environ.env -> Coqast.t -> constr

(*s Second part : Given a term with second-order variables in it,
   represented by Meta's, and possibly applied using \verb!XTRA[$SOAPP]! to
   terms, this function will perform second-order, binding-preserving,
   matching, in the case where the pattern is a pattern in the sense
   of Dale Miller.

   ALGORITHM:

   Given a pattern, we decompose it, flattening casts and apply's,
   recursing on all operators, and pushing the name of the binder each
   time we descend a binder.

   When we reach a first-order variable, we ask that the corresponding
   term's free-rels all be higher than the depth of the current stack.

   When we reach a second-order application, we ask that the
   intersection of the free-rels of the term and the current stack be
   contained in the arguments of the application, and in that case, we
   construct a [DLAM] with the names on the stack. *)

val somatch      : int list option -> constr -> constr -> (int * constr) list
val somatches    : constr -> marked_term -> bool
val dest_somatch : constr -> marked_term -> constr list
val soinstance   : marked_term -> constr list -> constr 

val is_imp_term : constr -> bool

(*s I implemented the following functions which test whether a term [t]
   is an inductive but non-recursive type, a general conjuction, a
   general disjunction, or a type with no constructors.

   They are more general than matching with [or_term], [and_term], etc, 
   since they do not depend on the name of the type. Hence, they 
   also work on ad-hoc disjunctions introduced by the user.
   (Eduardo, 6/8/97). *)

type 'a matching_function = constr -> 'a option
type testing_function = constr -> bool

val match_with_non_recursive_type : (constr * constr list) matching_function
val is_non_recursive_type         : testing_function 

val match_with_disjunction : (constr * constr list) matching_function
val is_disjunction         : testing_function 

val match_with_conjunction : (constr * constr list) matching_function
val is_conjunction         : testing_function 

val match_with_empty_type  : constr matching_function
val is_empty_type          : testing_function 

val match_with_unit_type   : constr matching_function
val is_unit_type           : testing_function 

val match_with_equation    : (constr * constr list) matching_function
val is_equation            : testing_function 

val match_with_nottype     : (constr * constr) matching_function
val is_nottype             : testing_function