blob: 6a4a8126e1677d20c6add162b2094d966dbd804b (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
|
(************************************************************************)
(* v * The Coq Proof Assistant / The Coq Development Team *)
(* <O___,, * INRIA - CNRS - LIX - LRI - PPS - Copyright 1999-2016 *)
(* \VV/ **************************************************************)
(* // * This file is distributed under the terms of the *)
(* * GNU Lesser General Public License Version 2.1 *)
(************************************************************************)
(*i*)
open Names
open Term
open Evd
open Environ
open Ind_tables
open Locus
open Misctypes
open Tactypes
(*i*)
type dep_proof_flag = bool (* true = support rewriting dependent proofs *)
type freeze_evars_flag = bool (* true = don't instantiate existing evars *)
type orientation = bool
type conditions =
| Naive (* Only try the first occurrence of the lemma (default) *)
| FirstSolved (* Use the first match whose side-conditions are solved *)
| AllMatches (* Rewrite all matches whose side-conditions are solved *)
val general_rewrite_bindings :
orientation -> occurrences -> freeze_evars_flag -> dep_proof_flag ->
?tac:(unit Proofview.tactic * conditions) -> constr with_bindings -> evars_flag -> unit Proofview.tactic
val general_rewrite :
orientation -> occurrences -> freeze_evars_flag -> dep_proof_flag ->
?tac:(unit Proofview.tactic * conditions) -> constr -> unit Proofview.tactic
(* Equivalent to [general_rewrite l2r] *)
val rewriteLR : ?tac:(unit Proofview.tactic * conditions) -> constr -> unit Proofview.tactic
val rewriteRL : ?tac:(unit Proofview.tactic * conditions) -> constr -> unit Proofview.tactic
(* Warning: old [general_rewrite_in] is now [general_rewrite_bindings_in] *)
val general_setoid_rewrite_clause :
(Id.t option -> orientation -> occurrences -> constr with_bindings ->
new_goals:constr list -> unit Proofview.tactic) Hook.t
val general_rewrite_ebindings_clause : Id.t option ->
orientation -> occurrences -> freeze_evars_flag -> dep_proof_flag ->
?tac:(unit Proofview.tactic * conditions) -> constr with_bindings -> evars_flag -> unit Proofview.tactic
val general_rewrite_bindings_in :
orientation -> occurrences -> freeze_evars_flag -> dep_proof_flag ->
?tac:(unit Proofview.tactic * conditions) ->
Id.t -> constr with_bindings -> evars_flag -> unit Proofview.tactic
val general_rewrite_in :
orientation -> occurrences -> freeze_evars_flag -> dep_proof_flag ->
?tac:(unit Proofview.tactic * conditions) -> Id.t -> constr -> evars_flag -> unit Proofview.tactic
val general_rewrite_clause :
orientation -> evars_flag -> ?tac:(unit Proofview.tactic * conditions) -> constr with_bindings -> clause -> unit Proofview.tactic
val general_multi_rewrite :
evars_flag -> (bool * multi * clear_flag * delayed_open_constr_with_bindings) list ->
clause -> (unit Proofview.tactic * conditions) option -> unit Proofview.tactic
val replace_in_clause_maybe_by : constr -> constr -> clause -> unit Proofview.tactic option -> unit Proofview.tactic
val replace : constr -> constr -> unit Proofview.tactic
val replace_by : constr -> constr -> unit Proofview.tactic -> unit Proofview.tactic
val discr : evars_flag -> constr with_bindings -> unit Proofview.tactic
val discrConcl : unit Proofview.tactic
val discrHyp : Id.t -> unit Proofview.tactic
val discrEverywhere : evars_flag -> unit Proofview.tactic
val discr_tac : evars_flag ->
constr with_bindings destruction_arg option -> unit Proofview.tactic
val inj : intro_patterns option -> evars_flag ->
clear_flag -> constr with_bindings -> unit Proofview.tactic
val injClause : intro_patterns option -> evars_flag ->
constr with_bindings destruction_arg option -> unit Proofview.tactic
val injHyp : clear_flag -> Id.t -> unit Proofview.tactic
val injConcl : unit Proofview.tactic
val simpleInjClause : evars_flag ->
constr with_bindings destruction_arg option -> unit Proofview.tactic
val dEq : evars_flag -> constr with_bindings destruction_arg option -> unit Proofview.tactic
val dEqThen : evars_flag -> (clear_flag -> constr -> int -> unit Proofview.tactic) -> constr with_bindings destruction_arg option -> unit Proofview.tactic
val make_iterated_tuple :
env -> evar_map -> constr -> (constr * types) -> evar_map * (constr * constr * constr)
(* The family cutRewriteIn expect an equality statement *)
val cutRewriteInHyp : bool -> types -> Id.t -> unit Proofview.tactic
val cutRewriteInConcl : bool -> constr -> unit Proofview.tactic
(* The family rewriteIn expect the proof of an equality *)
val rewriteInHyp : bool -> constr -> Id.t -> unit Proofview.tactic
val rewriteInConcl : bool -> constr -> unit Proofview.tactic
val discriminable : env -> evar_map -> constr -> constr -> bool
val injectable : env -> evar_map -> constr -> constr -> bool
(* Subst *)
(* val unfold_body : Id.t -> tactic *)
type subst_tactic_flags = {
only_leibniz : bool;
rewrite_dependent_proof : bool
}
val subst_gen : bool -> Id.t list -> unit Proofview.tactic
val subst : Id.t list -> unit Proofview.tactic
val subst_all : ?flags:subst_tactic_flags -> unit -> unit Proofview.tactic
(* Replace term *)
(* [replace_term dir_opt c cl]
perfoms replacement of [c] by the first value found in context
(according to [dir] if given to get the rewrite direction) in the clause [cl]
*)
val replace_term : bool option -> constr -> clause -> unit Proofview.tactic
val set_eq_dec_scheme_kind : mutual scheme_kind -> unit
(* [build_selector env sigma i c t u v] matches on [c] of
type [t] and returns [u] in branch [i] and [v] on other branches *)
val build_selector : env -> evar_map -> int -> constr -> types ->
constr -> constr -> constr
|
