(************************************************************************) (* v * The Coq Proof Assistant / The Coq Development Team *) (* (pi2 (Global.lookup_named id),variable_opacity id) | ConstRef cst -> let cb = Global.lookup_constant cst in (body_of_constant cb, is_opaque cb) | _ -> assert false let adjust_guardness_conditions const = function | [] -> const (* Not a recursive statement *) | possible_indexes -> (* Try all combinations... not optimal *) let env = Global.env() in { const with const_entry_body = Future.chain ~greedy:true ~pure:true const.const_entry_body (fun (body, eff) -> match kind_of_term body with | Fix ((nv,0),(_,_,fixdefs as fixdecls)) -> (* let possible_indexes = List.map2 (fun i c -> match i with Some i -> i | None -> List.interval 0 (List.length ((lam_assum c)))) lemma_guard (Array.to_list fixdefs) in *) let indexes = search_guard Loc.ghost env possible_indexes fixdecls in mkFix ((indexes,0),fixdecls), eff | _ -> body, eff) } let find_mutually_recursive_statements thms = let n = List.length thms in let inds = List.map (fun (id,(t,impls,annot)) -> let (hyps,ccl) = decompose_prod_assum t in let x = (id,(t,impls)) in match annot with (* Explicit fixpoint decreasing argument is given *) | Some (Some (_,id),CStructRec) -> let i,b,typ = lookup_rel_id id hyps in (match kind_of_term t with | Ind (kn,_ as ind) when let mind = Global.lookup_mind kn in mind.mind_finite && Option.is_empty b -> [ind,x,i],[] | _ -> error "Decreasing argument is not an inductive assumption.") (* Unsupported cases *) | Some (_,(CWfRec _|CMeasureRec _)) -> error "Only structural decreasing is supported for mutual statements." (* Cofixpoint or fixpoint w/o explicit decreasing argument *) | None | Some (None, CStructRec) -> let whnf_hyp_hds = map_rel_context_in_env (fun env c -> fst (whd_betadeltaiota_stack env Evd.empty c)) (Global.env()) hyps in let ind_hyps = List.flatten (List.map_i (fun i (_,b,t) -> match kind_of_term t with | Ind (kn,_ as ind) when let mind = Global.lookup_mind kn in mind.mind_finite && Option.is_empty b -> [ind,x,i] | _ -> []) 0 (List.rev whnf_hyp_hds)) in let ind_ccl = let cclenv = push_rel_context hyps (Global.env()) in let whnf_ccl,_ = whd_betadeltaiota_stack cclenv Evd.empty ccl in match kind_of_term whnf_ccl with | Ind (kn,_ as ind) when let mind = Global.lookup_mind kn in Int.equal mind.mind_ntypes n && not mind.mind_finite -> [ind,x,0] | _ -> [] in ind_hyps,ind_ccl) thms in let inds_hyps,ind_ccls = List.split inds in let of_same_mutind ((kn,_),_,_) = function ((kn',_),_,_) -> eq_mind kn kn' in (* Check if all conclusions are coinductive in the same type *) (* (degenerated cartesian product since there is at most one coind ccl) *) let same_indccl = List.cartesians_filter (fun hyp oks -> if List.for_all (of_same_mutind hyp) oks then Some (hyp::oks) else None) [] ind_ccls in let ordered_same_indccl = List.filter (List.for_all_i (fun i ((kn,j),_,_) -> Int.equal i j) 0) same_indccl in (* Check if some hypotheses are inductive in the same type *) let common_same_indhyp = List.cartesians_filter (fun hyp oks -> if List.for_all (of_same_mutind hyp) oks then Some (hyp::oks) else None) [] inds_hyps in let ordered_inds,finite,guard = match ordered_same_indccl, common_same_indhyp with | indccl::rest, _ -> assert (List.is_empty rest); (* One occ. of common coind ccls and no common inductive hyps *) if not (List.is_empty common_same_indhyp) then if_verbose msg_info (str "Assuming mutual coinductive statements."); flush_all (); indccl, true, [] | [], _::_ -> let () = match same_indccl with | ind :: _ -> if List.distinct_f ind_ord (List.map pi1 ind) then if_verbose msg_info (strbrk ("Coinductive statements do not follow the order of "^ "definition, assuming the proof to be by induction.")); flush_all () | _ -> () in let possible_guards = List.map (List.map pi3) inds_hyps in (* assume the largest indices as possible *) List.last common_same_indhyp, false, possible_guards | _, [] -> error ("Cannot find common (mutual) inductive premises or coinductive" ^ " conclusions in the statements.") in (finite,guard,None), ordered_inds let look_for_possibly_mutual_statements = function | [id,(t,impls,None)] -> (* One non recursively proved theorem *) None,[id,(t,impls)],None | _::_ as thms -> (* More than one statement and/or an explicit decreasing mark: *) (* we look for a common inductive hyp or a common coinductive conclusion *) let recguard,ordered_inds = find_mutually_recursive_statements thms in let thms = List.map pi2 ordered_inds in Some recguard,thms, Some (List.map (fun (_,_,i) -> succ i) ordered_inds) | [] -> anomaly (Pp.str "Empty list of theorems.") (* Saving a goal *) let save id const do_guard (locality,kind) hook = let const = adjust_guardness_conditions const do_guard in let k = Kindops.logical_kind_of_goal_kind kind in let l,r = match locality with | Discharge when Lib.sections_are_opened () -> let c = SectionLocalDef const in let _ = declare_variable id (Lib.cwd(), c, k) in (Local, VarRef id) | Local | Global | Discharge -> let local = match locality with | Local | Discharge -> true | Global -> false in let kn = declare_constant id ~local (DefinitionEntry const, k) in Autoinstance.search_declaration (ConstRef kn); (locality, ConstRef kn) in definition_message id; hook l r let default_thm_id = Id.of_string "Unnamed_thm" let compute_proof_name locality = function | Some (loc,id) -> (* We check existence here: it's a bit late at Qed time *) if Nametab.exists_cci (Lib.make_path id) || is_section_variable id || locality == Global && Nametab.exists_cci (Lib.make_path_except_section id) then user_err_loc (loc,"",pr_id id ++ str " already exists."); id | None -> next_global_ident_away default_thm_id (Pfedit.get_all_proof_names ()) let save_remaining_recthms (locality,kind) body opaq i (id,(t_i,(_,imps))) = match body with | None -> (match locality with | Discharge -> let impl = false in (* copy values from Vernacentries *) let k = IsAssumption Conjectural in let c = SectionLocalAssum (t_i,impl) in let _ = declare_variable id (Lib.cwd(),c,k) in (Discharge, VarRef id,imps) | Local | Global -> let k = IsAssumption Conjectural in let local = match locality with | Local -> true | Global -> false | Discharge -> assert false in let decl = (ParameterEntry (None,t_i,None), k) in let kn = declare_constant id ~local decl in (locality,ConstRef kn,imps)) | Some body -> let k = Kindops.logical_kind_of_goal_kind kind in let body_i = match kind_of_term body with | Fix ((nv,0),decls) -> mkFix ((nv,i),decls) | CoFix (0,decls) -> mkCoFix (i,decls) | _ -> anomaly (Pp.str "Not a proof by induction") in match locality with | Discharge -> let const = { const_entry_body = Future.from_val (body_i,Declareops.no_seff); const_entry_secctx = None; const_entry_type = Some t_i; const_entry_opaque = opaq; const_entry_inline_code = false; const_entry_feedback = None; } in let c = SectionLocalDef const in let _ = declare_variable id (Lib.cwd(), c, k) in (Discharge,VarRef id,imps) | Local | Global -> let local = match locality with | Local -> true | Global -> false | Discharge -> assert false in let const = { const_entry_body = Future.from_val (body_i,Declareops.no_seff); const_entry_secctx = None; const_entry_type = Some t_i; const_entry_opaque = opaq; const_entry_inline_code = false; const_entry_feedback = None; } in let kn = declare_constant id ~local (DefinitionEntry const, k) in (locality,ConstRef kn,imps) let save_hook = ref ignore let set_save_hook f = save_hook := f let save_named proof = let id,const,do_guard,persistence,hook = proof in save id const do_guard persistence hook let check_anonymity id save_ident = if not (String.equal (atompart_of_id id) (Id.to_string (default_thm_id))) then error "This command can only be used for unnamed theorem." let save_anonymous proof save_ident = let id,const,do_guard,persistence,hook = proof in check_anonymity id save_ident; save save_ident const do_guard persistence hook let save_anonymous_with_strength proof kind save_ident = let id,const,do_guard,_,hook = proof in check_anonymity id save_ident; (* we consider that non opaque behaves as local for discharge *) save save_ident const do_guard (Global, Proof kind) hook (* Admitted *) let admit hook () = let (id,k,typ) = Pfedit.current_proof_statement () in let e = Pfedit.get_used_variables(), typ, None in let kn = declare_constant id (ParameterEntry e,IsAssumption Conjectural) in let () = match fst k with | Global -> () | Local | Discharge -> msg_warning (str "Let definition" ++ spc () ++ pr_id id ++ spc () ++ str "declared as an axiom.") in let () = assumption_message id in hook Global (ConstRef kn) (* Starting a goal *) let start_hook = ref ignore let set_start_hook = (:=) start_hook let get_proof proof do_guard hook opacity = let (id,(const,persistence)) = Pfedit.cook_this_proof proof in id,{const with const_entry_opaque = opacity},do_guard,persistence,hook let standard_proof_terminator compute_guard hook = let open Proof_global in function | Admitted -> admit hook (); Pp.feedback Interface.AddedAxiom | Proved (is_opaque,idopt,proof) -> let proof = get_proof proof compute_guard hook is_opaque in begin match idopt with | None -> save_named proof | Some ((_,id),None) -> save_anonymous proof id | Some ((_,id),Some kind) -> save_anonymous_with_strength proof kind id end let start_proof id kind ?sign c ?init_tac ?(compute_guard=[]) hook = let terminator = standard_proof_terminator compute_guard hook in let sign = match sign with | Some sign -> sign | None -> initialize_named_context_for_proof () in !start_hook c; Pfedit.start_proof id kind sign c ?init_tac terminator let rec_tac_initializer finite guard thms snl = if finite then match List.map (fun (id,(t,_)) -> (id,t)) thms with | (id,_)::l -> Tactics.mutual_cofix id l 0 | _ -> assert false else (* nl is dummy: it will be recomputed at Qed-time *) let nl = match snl with | None -> List.map succ (List.map List.last guard) | Some nl -> nl in match List.map2 (fun (id,(t,_)) n -> (id,n,t)) thms nl with | (id,n,_)::l -> Tactics.mutual_fix id n l 0 | _ -> assert false let start_proof_with_initialization kind recguard thms snl hook = let intro_tac (_, (_, (ids, _))) = Tacticals.New.tclMAP (function | Name id -> Tactics.intro_mustbe_force id | Anonymous -> Tactics.intro) (List.rev ids) in let init_tac,guard = match recguard with | Some (finite,guard,init_tac) -> let rec_tac = Proofview.V82.tactic (rec_tac_initializer finite guard thms snl) in Some (match init_tac with | None -> if Flags.is_auto_intros () then Tacticals.New.tclTHENS rec_tac (List.map intro_tac thms) else rec_tac | Some tacl -> Tacticals.New.tclTHENS rec_tac (if Flags.is_auto_intros () then List.map2 (fun tac thm -> Tacticals.New.tclTHEN tac (intro_tac thm)) tacl thms else tacl)),guard | None -> let () = match thms with [_] -> () | _ -> assert false in (if Flags.is_auto_intros () then Some (intro_tac (List.hd thms)) else None), [] in match thms with | [] -> anomaly (Pp.str "No proof to start") | (id,(t,(_,imps)))::other_thms -> let hook strength ref = let other_thms_data = if List.is_empty other_thms then [] else (* there are several theorems defined mutually *) let body,opaq = retrieve_first_recthm ref in List.map_i (save_remaining_recthms kind body opaq) 1 other_thms in let thms_data = (strength,ref,imps)::other_thms_data in List.iter (fun (strength,ref,imps) -> maybe_declare_manual_implicits false ref imps; hook strength ref) thms_data in start_proof id kind t ?init_tac hook ~compute_guard:guard let start_proof_com kind thms hook = let evdref = ref Evd.empty in let env0 = Global.env () in let thms = List.map (fun (sopt,(bl,t,guard)) -> let impls, ((env, ctx), imps) = interp_context_evars evdref env0 bl in let t', imps' = interp_type_evars_impls ~impls evdref env t in check_evars_are_solved env Evd.empty !evdref; let ids = List.map pi1 ctx in (compute_proof_name (fst kind) sopt, (nf_evar !evdref (it_mkProd_or_LetIn t' ctx), (ids, imps @ lift_implicits (List.length ids) imps'), guard))) thms in let recguard,thms,snl = look_for_possibly_mutual_statements thms in start_proof_with_initialization kind recguard thms snl hook (* Saving a proof *) let save_proof ?proof = function | Vernacexpr.Admitted -> Proof_global.get_terminator() Proof_global.Admitted | Vernacexpr.Proved (is_opaque,idopt) -> let (proof_obj,terminator) = match proof with | None -> Proof_global.close_proof (fun x -> x) | Some proof -> proof in (* if the proof is given explicitly, nothing has to be deleted *) if Option.is_empty proof then Pfedit.delete_current_proof (); terminator (Proof_global.Proved (is_opaque,idopt,proof_obj)) (* Miscellaneous *) let get_current_context () = try Pfedit.get_current_goal_context () with e when Logic.catchable_exception e -> (Evd.empty, Global.env())