(***********************************************************************) (* v * The Coq Proof Assistant / The Coq Development Team *) (* mv::acc | _ -> fold_constr collrec acc c in collrec [] c let check_no_metas clenv ccl = if occur_meta ccl then let metas = List.map (fun n -> Intmap.find n clenv.namenv) (collect_meta_variables ccl) in errorlabstrm "inversion" (str ("Cannot find an instantiation for variable"^ (if List.length metas = 1 then " " else "s ")) ++ prlist_with_sep pr_coma pr_id metas (* ajouter "in " ++ prterm ccl mais il faut le bon contexte *)) let dest_match_eq gls eqn = try pf_matches gls (Coqlib.build_coq_eq_pattern ()) eqn with PatternMatchingFailure -> (try pf_matches gls (Coqlib.build_coq_eqT_pattern ()) eqn with PatternMatchingFailure -> (try pf_matches gls (Coqlib.build_coq_idT_pattern ()) eqn with PatternMatchingFailure -> errorlabstrm "dest_match_eq" (str "no primitive equality here"))) let var_occurs_in_pf gl id = let env = pf_env gl in occur_var env id (pf_concl gl) or List.exists (occur_var_in_decl env id) (pf_hyps gl) (* [make_inv_predicate (ity,args) C] is given the inductive type, its arguments, both the global parameters and its local arguments, and is expected to produce a predicate P such that if largs is the "local" part of the arguments, then (P largs) will be convertible with a conclusion of the form: a1=a1->a2=a2 ... -> C Algorithm: suppose length(largs)=n (1) Push the entire arity, [xbar:Abar], carrying along largs and the conclusion (2) Pair up each ai with its respective Rel version: a1==(Rel n), a2==(Rel n-1), etc. (3) For each pair, ai,Rel j, if the Ai is dependent - that is, the type of [Rel j] is an open term, then we construct the iterated tuple, [make_iterated_tuple] does it, and use that for our equation Otherwise, we just use ai=Rel j *) type inversion_status = Dep of constr option | NoDep let compute_eqn env sigma n i ai = (ai,get_type_of env sigma ai), (mkRel (n-i),get_type_of env sigma (mkRel (n-i))) let make_inv_predicate env sigma ind id status concl = let indf,realargs = dest_ind_type ind in let nrealargs = List.length realargs in let (hyps,concl) = match status with | NoDep -> (* We push the arity and leave concl unchanged *) let hyps_arity,_ = get_arity env indf in (hyps_arity,concl) | Dep dflt_concl -> if not (occur_var env id concl) then errorlabstrm "make_inv_predicate" (str "Current goal does not depend on " ++ pr_id id); (* We abstract the conclusion of goal with respect to realargs and c to * be concl in order to rewrite and have c also rewritten when the case * will be done *) let pred = match dflt_concl with | Some concl -> concl (*assumed it's some [x1..xn,H:I(x1..xn)]C*) | None -> let sort = get_sort_of env sigma concl in let p = make_arity env true indf sort in abstract_list_all env sigma p concl (realargs@[mkVar id]) in let hyps,bodypred = decompose_lam_n_assum (nrealargs+1) pred in (* We lift to make room for the equations *) (hyps,lift nrealargs bodypred) in let nhyps = List.length hyps in let env' = push_rel_context hyps env in let realargs' = List.map (lift nhyps) realargs in let pairs = list_map_i (compute_eqn env' sigma nhyps) 0 realargs' in (* Now the arity is pushed, and we need to construct the pairs * ai,mkRel(n-i+1) *) (* Now, we can recurse down this list, for each ai,(mkRel k) whether to push (mkRel k)=ai (when Ai is closed). In any case, we carry along the rest of pairs *) let rec build_concl eqns n = function | [] -> (prod_it concl eqns,n) | ((ai,ati),(xi,ti))::restlist -> let (lhs,eqnty,rhs) = if closed0 ti then (xi,ti,ai) else make_iterated_tuple env' sigma (ai,ati) (xi,ti) in let type_type_rhs = get_sort_of env sigma (type_of env sigma rhs) in let sort = get_sort_of env sigma concl in let eq_term = find_eq_pattern type_type_rhs sort in let eqn = applist (eq_term ,[eqnty;lhs;rhs]) in build_concl ((Anonymous,lift n eqn)::eqns) (n+1) restlist in let (newconcl,neqns) = build_concl [] 0 pairs in let predicate = it_mkLambda_or_LetIn_name env newconcl hyps in (* OK - this predicate should now be usable by res_elimination_then to do elimination on the conclusion. *) (predicate,neqns) (* The result of the elimination is a bunch of goals like: |- (cibar:Cibar)Equands->C where the cibar are either dependent or not. We are fed a signature, with "true" for every recursive argument, and false for every non-recursive one. So we need to do the sign_branch_len(sign) intros, thinning out all recursive assumptions. This leaves us with exactly length(sign) assumptions. We save their names, and then do introductions for all the equands (there are some number of them, which is the other argument of the tactic) This gives us the #neqns equations, whose names we get also, and the #length(sign) arguments. Suppose that #nodep of these arguments are non-dependent. Generalize and thin them. This gives us #dep = #length(sign)-#nodep arguments which are dependent. Now, we want to take each of the equations, and do all possible injections to get the left-hand-side to be a variable. At the same time, if we find a lhs/rhs pair which are different, we can discriminate them to prove false and finish the branch. Then, we thin away the equations, and do the introductions for the #nodep arguments which we generalized before. *) (* Called after the case-assumptions have been killed off, and all the intros have been done. Given that the clause in question is an equality (if it isn't we fail), we are responsible for projecting the equality, using Injection and Discriminate, and applying it to the concusion *) (* Computes the subset of hypothesis in the local context whose type depends on t (should be of the form (mkVar id)), then it generalizes them, applies tac to rewrite all occurrencies of t, and introduces generalized hypotheis. Precondition: t=(mkVar id) *) let rec dependent_hyps id idlist sign = let rec dep_rec =function | [] -> [] | (id1,_,id1ty as d1)::l -> if occur_var (Global.env()) id (body_of_type id1ty) then d1 :: dep_rec l else dep_rec l in dep_rec idlist let split_dep_and_nodep hyps gl = List.fold_right (fun (id,_,_ as d) (l1,l2) -> if var_occurs_in_pf gl id then (d::l1,l2) else (l1,d::l2)) hyps ([],[]) let dest_nf_eq gls t = match dest_match_eq gls t with | [(1,x);(2,y);(3,z)] -> (x,pf_whd_betadeltaiota gls y, pf_whd_betadeltaiota gls z) | _ -> error "dest_nf_eq: should be an equality" let generalizeRewriteIntros tac depids id gls = let dids = dependent_hyps id depids (pf_env gls) in (tclTHENSEQ [bring_hyps dids; tac; intros_replacing (ids_of_named_context dids)]) gls (* invariant: ProjectAndApply is responsible for erasing the clause which it is given as input It simplifies the clause (an equality) to use it as a rewrite rule and then erases the result of the simplification. *) (* invariant: ProjectAndApplyNoThining simplifies the clause (an equality) . If it can discriminate then the goal is proved, if not tries to use it as a rewrite rule. It erases the clause which is given as input *) let projectAndApply thin id depids gls = let env = pf_env gls in let subst_hyp_LR id = tclTRY(hypSubst_LR id None) in let subst_hyp_RL id = tclTRY(hypSubst_RL id None) in let subst_hyp gls = let orient_rule id = let (t,t1,t2) = dest_nf_eq gls (pf_get_hyp_typ gls id) in match (kind_of_term t1, kind_of_term t2) with | Var id1, _ -> generalizeRewriteIntros (subst_hyp_LR id) depids id1 | _, Var id2 -> generalizeRewriteIntros (subst_hyp_RL id) depids id2 | _ -> subst_hyp_RL id in onLastHyp orient_rule gls in let (t,t1,t2) = dest_nf_eq gls (pf_get_hyp_typ gls id) in match (thin, kind_of_term t1, kind_of_term t2) with | (true, Var id1, _) -> generalizeRewriteIntros (tclTHEN (subst_hyp_LR id) (clear [id])) depids id1 gls | (false, Var id1, _) -> generalizeRewriteIntros (subst_hyp_LR id) depids id1 gls | (true, _ , Var id2) -> generalizeRewriteIntros (tclTHEN (subst_hyp_RL id) (clear [id])) depids id2 gls | (false, _ , Var id2) -> generalizeRewriteIntros (subst_hyp_RL id) depids id2 gls | _ -> let trailer = if thin then onLastHyp (fun id -> clear [id]) else tclIDTAC in let deq_trailer neqns = tclDO neqns (tclTHENSEQ [intro; tclTRY subst_hyp; trailer]) in (tclTHEN (dEqThen deq_trailer (Some (NamedHyp id))) (clear [id])) gls (* Inversion qui n'introduit pas les hypotheses, afin de pouvoir les nommer soi-meme (proposition de Valerie). *) let rewrite_equations_gene othin neqns ba gl = let (depids,nodepids) = split_dep_and_nodep ba.assums gl in let rewrite_eqns = match othin with | Some thin -> onLastHyp (fun last -> tclTHENSEQ [tclDO neqns (tclTHEN intro (onLastHyp (fun id -> tclTRY (projectAndApply thin id depids)))); onHyps (compose List.rev (afterHyp last)) bring_hyps; onHyps (afterHyp last) (compose clear ids_of_named_context)]) | None -> tclIDTAC in (tclTHENSEQ [tclDO neqns intro; bring_hyps nodepids; clear (ids_of_named_context nodepids); onHyps (compose List.rev (nLastHyps neqns)) bring_hyps; onHyps (nLastHyps neqns) (compose clear ids_of_named_context); rewrite_eqns; tclMAP (fun (id,_,_ as d) -> (tclORELSE (clear [id]) (tclTHEN (bring_hyps [d]) (clear [id])))) depids]) gl (* Introduction of the equations on arguments othin: discriminates Simple Inversion, Inversion and Inversion_clear None: the equations are introduced, but not rewritten Some thin: the equations are rewritten, and cleared if thin is true *) let rewrite_equations othin neqns ba gl = let (depids,nodepids) = split_dep_and_nodep ba.assums gl in let rewrite_eqns = match othin with | Some thin -> tclTHENSEQ [onHyps (compose List.rev (nLastHyps neqns)) bring_hyps; onHyps (nLastHyps neqns) (compose clear ids_of_named_context); tclDO neqns (tclTHEN intro (onLastHyp (fun id -> tclTRY (projectAndApply thin id depids)))); tclDO (List.length nodepids) intro; tclMAP (fun (id,_,_) -> tclTRY (clear [id])) depids] | None -> tclIDTAC in (tclTHENSEQ [tclDO neqns intro; bring_hyps nodepids; clear (ids_of_named_context nodepids); rewrite_eqns]) gl let rewrite_equations_tac (gene, othin) id neqns ba = let tac = if gene then rewrite_equations_gene othin neqns ba else rewrite_equations othin neqns ba in if othin = Some true (* if Inversion_clear, clear the hypothesis *) then tclTHEN tac (tclTRY (clear [id])) else tac let raw_inversion inv_kind indbinding id status gl = let env = pf_env gl and sigma = project gl in let c = mkVar id in let (wc,kONT) = startWalk gl in let t = strong_prodspine (pf_whd_betadeltaiota gl) (pf_type_of gl c) in let indclause = mk_clenv_from wc (c,t) in let indclause' = clenv_constrain_with_bindings indbinding indclause in let newc = clenv_instance_template indclause' in let ccl = clenv_instance_template_type indclause' in check_no_metas indclause' ccl; let (IndType (indf,realargs) as indt) = try find_rectype env sigma ccl with Not_found -> errorlabstrm "raw_inversion" (str ("The type of "^(string_of_id id)^" is not inductive")) in let (elim_predicate,neqns) = make_inv_predicate env sigma indt id status (pf_concl gl) in let (cut_concl,case_tac) = if status <> NoDep & (dependent c (pf_concl gl)) then Reduction.beta_appvect elim_predicate (Array.of_list (realargs@[c])), case_then_using else Reduction.beta_appvect elim_predicate (Array.of_list realargs), case_nodep_then_using in (tclTHENS (true_cut None cut_concl) [case_tac (introCaseAssumsThen (rewrite_equations_tac inv_kind id neqns)) (Some elim_predicate) ([],[]) newc; onLastHyp (fun id -> (tclTHEN (applyUsing (applist(mkVar id, list_tabulate (fun _ -> mkMeta(Clenv.new_meta())) neqns))) reflexivity))]) gl (* Error messages of the inversion tactics *) let not_found_message ids = if List.length ids = 1 then (str "the variable" ++ spc () ++ str (string_of_id (List.hd ids)) ++ spc () ++ str" was not found in the current environment") else (str "the variables [" ++ spc () ++ prlist (fun id -> (str (string_of_id id) ++ spc ())) ids ++ str" ] were not found in the current environment") let dep_prop_prop_message id = errorlabstrm "Inv" (str "Inversion on " ++ pr_id id ++ str " would needs dependent elimination Prop-Prop") let not_inductive_here id = errorlabstrm "mind_specif_of_mind" (str "Cannot recognize an inductive predicate in " ++ pr_id id ++ str ". If there is one, may be the structure of the arity or of the type of constructors is hidden by constant definitions.") (* Noms d'errreurs obsolètes ?? *) let wrap_inv_error id = function | UserError ("Case analysis",s) -> errorlabstrm "Inv needs Nodep Prop Set" s | UserError("mind_specif_of_mind",_) -> not_inductive_here id | UserError (a,b) -> errorlabstrm "Inv" b | Invalid_argument (*"it_list2"*) "List.fold_left2" -> dep_prop_prop_message id | Not_found -> errorlabstrm "Inv" (not_found_message [id]) | e -> raise e (* The most general inversion tactic *) let inversion inv_kind status id gls = try (raw_inversion inv_kind [] id status) gls with e -> wrap_inv_error id e (* Specializing it... *) let inv_gen gene thin status = try_intros_until (inversion (gene,thin) status) open Tacexpr (* let hinv_kind = Quoted_string "HalfInversion" let inv_kind = Quoted_string "Inversion" let invclr_kind = Quoted_string "InversionClear" let com_of_id id = if id = hinv_kind then None else if id = inv_kind then Some false else Some true *) let inv k id = inv_gen false k NoDep id let half_inv_tac id = inv None (NamedHyp id) let inv_tac id = inv (Some false) (NamedHyp id) let inv_clear_tac id = inv (Some true) (NamedHyp id) let dinv k c id = inv_gen false k (Dep c) id let half_dinv_tac id = dinv None None (NamedHyp id) let dinv_tac id = dinv (Some false) None (NamedHyp id) let dinv_clear_tac id = dinv (Some true) None (NamedHyp id) (* InvIn will bring the specified clauses into the conclusion, and then * perform inversion on the named hypothesis. After, it will intro them * back to their places in the hyp-list. *) let invIn com id ids gls = let hyps = List.map (pf_get_hyp gls) ids in let nb_prod_init = nb_prod (pf_concl gls) in let intros_replace_ids gls = let nb_of_new_hyp = nb_prod (pf_concl gls) - (List.length hyps + nb_prod_init) in if nb_of_new_hyp < 1 then intros_replacing ids gls else tclTHEN (tclDO nb_of_new_hyp intro) (intros_replacing ids) gls in try (tclTHENSEQ [bring_hyps hyps; inversion (false, com) NoDep id; intros_replace_ids]) gls with e -> wrap_inv_error id e let invIn_gen com id idl = try_intros_until (fun id -> invIn com id idl) id