(************************************************************************) (* * The Coq Proof Assistant / The Coq Development Team *) (* v * INRIA, CNRS and contributors - Copyright 1999-2018 *) (* constr:(t1::t2::nil) | ?t1 = ?t2 => constr:(t1::t2::nil) | (_ ?t1 ?t2) => constr:(t1::t2::nil) end. Lemma Zeqb_ok: forall x y : Z, Zeq_bool x y = true -> x == y. intros x y H. rewrite (Zeq_bool_eq x y H). reflexivity. Qed. Ltac reify_goal lvar lexpr lterm:= (*idtac lvar; idtac lexpr; idtac lterm;*) match lexpr with nil => idtac | ?e1::?e2::_ => match goal with |- (?op ?u1 ?u2) => change (op (@PEeval Z _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (@gen_phiZ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _) N (fun n:N => n) (@pow_N _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _) lvar e1) (@PEeval Z _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (@gen_phiZ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _) N (fun n:N => n) (@pow_N _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _) lvar e2)) end end. Lemma comm: forall (R:Type)`{Ring R}(c : Z) (x : R), x * (gen_phiZ c) == (gen_phiZ c) * x. induction c. intros. simpl. gen_rewrite. simpl. intros. rewrite <- same_gen. induction p. simpl. gen_rewrite. rewrite IHp. reflexivity. simpl. gen_rewrite. rewrite IHp. reflexivity. simpl. gen_rewrite. simpl. intros. rewrite <- same_gen. induction p. simpl. generalize IHp. clear IHp. gen_rewrite. intro IHp. rewrite IHp. reflexivity. simpl. generalize IHp. clear IHp. gen_rewrite. intro IHp. rewrite IHp. reflexivity. simpl. gen_rewrite. Qed. Ltac ring_gen := match goal with |- ?g => let lterm := lterm_goal g in match eval red in (list_reifyl (lterm:=lterm)) with | (?fv, ?lexpr) => (*idtac "variables:";idtac fv; idtac "terms:"; idtac lterm; idtac "reifications:"; idtac lexpr; *) reify_goal fv lexpr lterm; match goal with |- ?g => apply (@ring_correct Z _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (@gen_phiZ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _) _ (@comm _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _) Zeq_bool Zeqb_ok N (fun n:N => n) (@pow_N _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _)); [apply mkpow_th; reflexivity |vm_compute; reflexivity] end end end. Ltac non_commutative_ring:= intros; ring_gen. (* simplification *) Ltac ring_simplify_aux lterm fv lexpr hyp := match lterm with | ?t0::?lterm => match lexpr with | ?e::?le => (* e:PExpr Z est la réification de t0:R *) let t := constr:(@Ncring_polynom.norm_subst Z 0%Z 1%Z Z.add Z.mul Z.sub Z.opp (@eq Z) Zops Zeq_bool e) in (* t:Pol Z *) let te := constr:(@Ncring_polynom.Pphi Z _ 0 1 _+_ _*_ _-_ -_ _==_ _ Ncring_initial.gen_phiZ fv t) in let eq1 := fresh "ring" in let nft := eval vm_compute in t in let t':= fresh "t" in pose (t' := nft); assert (eq1 : t = t'); [vm_cast_no_check (eq_refl t')| let eq2 := fresh "ring" in assert (eq2:(@Ncring_polynom.PEeval Z _ 0 1 _+_ _*_ _-_ -_ _==_ _ Ncring_initial.gen_phiZ N (fun n:N => n) (@Ring_theory.pow_N _ 1 multiplication) fv e) == te); [apply (@Ncring_polynom.norm_subst_ok Z _ 0%Z 1%Z Z.add Z.mul Z.sub Z.opp (@eq Z) _ _ 0 1 _+_ _*_ _-_ -_ _==_ _ _ Ncring_initial.gen_phiZ _ (@comm _ 0 1 _+_ _*_ _-_ -_ _==_ _ _) _ Zeqb_ok); apply mkpow_th; reflexivity | match hyp with | 1%nat => rewrite eq2 | ?H => try rewrite eq2 in H end]; let P:= fresh "P" in match hyp with | 1%nat => idtac "ok"; rewrite eq1; pattern (@Ncring_polynom.Pphi Z _ 0 1 _+_ _*_ _-_ -_ _==_ _ Ncring_initial.gen_phiZ fv t'); match goal with |- (?p ?t) => set (P:=p) end; unfold t' in *; clear t' eq1 eq2; simpl | ?H => rewrite eq1 in H; pattern (@Ncring_polynom.Pphi Z _ 0 1 _+_ _*_ _-_ -_ _==_ _ Ncring_initial.gen_phiZ fv t') in H; match type of H with | (?p ?t) => set (P:=p) in H end; unfold t' in *; clear t' eq1 eq2; simpl in H end; unfold P in *; clear P ]; ring_simplify_aux lterm fv le hyp | nil => idtac end | nil => idtac end. Ltac set_variables fv := match fv with | nil => idtac | ?t::?fv => let v := fresh "X" in set (v:=t) in *; set_variables fv end. Ltac deset n:= match n with | 0%nat => idtac | S ?n1 => match goal with | h:= ?v : ?t |- ?g => unfold h in *; clear h; deset n1 end end. (* a est soit un terme de l'anneau, soit une liste de termes. J'ai pas réussi à un décomposer les Vlists obtenues avec ne_constr_list dans Tactic Notation *) Ltac ring_simplify_gen a hyp := let lterm := match a with | _::_ => a | _ => constr:(a::nil) end in match eval red in (list_reifyl (lterm:=lterm)) with | (?fv, ?lexpr) => idtac lterm; idtac fv; idtac lexpr; let n := eval compute in (length fv) in idtac n; let lt:=fresh "lt" in set (lt:= lterm); let lv:=fresh "fv" in set (lv:= fv); (* les termes de fv sont remplacés par des variables pour pouvoir utiliser simpl ensuite sans risquer des simplifications indésirables *) set_variables fv; let lterm1 := eval unfold lt in lt in let lv1 := eval unfold lv in lv in idtac lterm1; idtac lv1; ring_simplify_aux lterm1 lv1 lexpr hyp; clear lt lv; (* on remet les termes de fv *) deset n end. Tactic Notation "non_commutative_ring_simplify" constr(lterm):= ring_simplify_gen lterm 1%nat. Tactic Notation "non_commutative_ring_simplify" constr(lterm) "in" ident(H):= ring_simplify_gen lterm H.