From fa9df2efe5666789bf91bb7761567cd53e6c451f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Emilio Jesus Gallego Arias Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2016 18:14:58 +0100 Subject: [stm] Break stm/toplevel dependency loop. Currently, the STM, vernac interpretation, and the toplevel are intertwined in a mutual dependency that needs to be resolved using imperative callbacks. This is problematic for a few reasons, in particular it makes the interpretation of commands that affect the document quite intricate. As a first step, we split the `toplevel/` directory into two: "pure" vernac interpretation is moved to the `vernac/` directory, on which the STM relies. Test suite passes, and only one command seems to be disabled with this approach, "Show Script" which is to my understanding obsolete. Subsequent commits will fix this and refine some of the invariants that are not needed anymore. --- vernac/lemmas.mli | 69 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 69 insertions(+) create mode 100644 vernac/lemmas.mli (limited to 'vernac/lemmas.mli') diff --git a/vernac/lemmas.mli b/vernac/lemmas.mli new file mode 100644 index 000000000..39c089be9 --- /dev/null +++ b/vernac/lemmas.mli @@ -0,0 +1,69 @@ +(************************************************************************) +(* v * The Coq Proof Assistant / The Coq Development Team *) +(* Globnames.global_reference -> 'a) -> 'a declaration_hook + +val call_hook : + Future.fix_exn -> 'a declaration_hook -> Decl_kinds.locality -> Globnames.global_reference -> 'a + +(** A hook start_proof calls on the type of the definition being started *) +val set_start_hook : (types -> unit) -> unit + +val start_proof : Id.t -> ?pl:universe_binders -> goal_kind -> Evd.evar_map -> + ?terminator:(lemma_possible_guards -> unit declaration_hook -> Proof_global.proof_terminator) -> + ?sign:Environ.named_context_val -> types -> + ?init_tac:unit Proofview.tactic -> ?compute_guard:lemma_possible_guards -> + unit declaration_hook -> unit + +val start_proof_univs : Id.t -> ?pl:universe_binders -> goal_kind -> Evd.evar_map -> + ?terminator:(lemma_possible_guards -> (Evd.evar_universe_context option -> unit declaration_hook) -> Proof_global.proof_terminator) -> + ?sign:Environ.named_context_val -> types -> + ?init_tac:unit Proofview.tactic -> ?compute_guard:lemma_possible_guards -> + (Evd.evar_universe_context option -> unit declaration_hook) -> unit + +val start_proof_com : + ?inference_hook:Pretyping.inference_hook -> + goal_kind -> Vernacexpr.proof_expr list -> + unit declaration_hook -> unit + +val start_proof_with_initialization : + goal_kind -> Evd.evar_map -> + (bool * lemma_possible_guards * unit Proofview.tactic list option) option -> + ((Id.t * universe_binders option) * + (types * (Name.t list * Impargs.manual_explicitation list))) list + -> int list option -> unit declaration_hook -> unit + +val universe_proof_terminator : + Proof_global.lemma_possible_guards -> + (Evd.evar_universe_context option -> unit declaration_hook) -> + Proof_global.proof_terminator + +val standard_proof_terminator : + Proof_global.lemma_possible_guards -> unit declaration_hook -> + Proof_global.proof_terminator + +(** {6 ... } *) + +(** A hook the next three functions pass to cook_proof *) +val set_save_hook : (Proof.proof -> unit) -> unit + +val save_proof : ?proof:Proof_global.closed_proof -> Vernacexpr.proof_end -> unit + + +(** [get_current_context ()] returns the evar context and env of the + current open proof if any, otherwise returns the empty evar context + and the current global env *) + +val get_current_context : unit -> Evd.evar_map * Environ.env -- cgit v1.2.3