From 4fef230a1ee1964712e3ac7f325ce00968ac4769 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jason Gross Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 11:14:04 -0400 Subject: "allows to", like "allowing to", is improper It's possible that I should have removed more "allows", as many instances of "foo allows to bar" could have been replaced by "foo bars" (e.g., "[Qed] allows to check and save a complete proof term" could be "[Qed] checks and saves a complete proof term"), but not always (e.g., "the optional argument allows to ignore universe polymorphism" should not be "the optional argument ignores universe polymorphism" but "the optional argument allows the caller to instruct Coq to ignore universe polymorphism" or something similar). --- theories/MSets/MSetAVL.v | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'theories/MSets') diff --git a/theories/MSets/MSetAVL.v b/theories/MSets/MSetAVL.v index 25d899029..e1fc454ae 100644 --- a/theories/MSets/MSetAVL.v +++ b/theories/MSets/MSetAVL.v @@ -312,7 +312,7 @@ Local Hint Resolve lt_tree_not_in lt_tree_trans gt_tree_not_in gt_tree_trans. Local Hint Resolve elements_spec2. (* Sometimes functional induction will expose too much of - a tree structure. The following tactic allows to factor back + a tree structure. The following tactic allows factoring back a Node whose internal parts occurs nowhere else. *) (* TODO: why Ltac instead of Tactic Notation don't work ? why clear ? *) -- cgit v1.2.3