From 67091e1d155be19333c5e5bd2cc306792ca630d3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Emilio Jesus Gallego Arias Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2018 01:38:19 +0100 Subject: [compat] Remove "Refolding Reduction" option. Following up on #6791, we remove support refolding in reduction. We also update a test case that was not properly understood, see the discussion in #6895. --- test-suite/output/inference.out | 2 -- test-suite/output/inference.v | 6 ------ 2 files changed, 8 deletions(-) (limited to 'test-suite/output') diff --git a/test-suite/output/inference.out b/test-suite/output/inference.out index d28ee4276..2dbe215bf 100644 --- a/test-suite/output/inference.out +++ b/test-suite/output/inference.out @@ -4,8 +4,6 @@ fun e : option L => match e with | None => None end : option L -> option L -fun (m n p : nat) (H : S m <= S n + p) => le_S_n m (n + p) H - : forall m n p : nat, S m <= S n + p -> m <= n + p fun n : nat => let y : T n := A n in ?t ?x : T n : forall n : nat, T n where diff --git a/test-suite/output/inference.v b/test-suite/output/inference.v index 73169dae6..57a4739e9 100644 --- a/test-suite/output/inference.v +++ b/test-suite/output/inference.v @@ -13,12 +13,6 @@ Definition P (e:option L) := Print P. -(* Check that plus is folded even if reduction is involved *) -Set Warnings Append "-deprecated-option". -Set Refolding Reduction. -Check (fun m n p (H : S m <= (S n) + p) => le_S_n _ _ H). - - (* Check that the heuristic to solve constraints is not artificially dependent on the presence of a let-in, and in particular that the second [_] below is not inferred to be n, as if obtained by -- cgit v1.2.3