From 0af54860172efe1aa5da419b81e4cb34348320ee Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Hugo Herbelin Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 13:42:41 +0100 Subject: Trying a hack to support {'pat|P} without breaking compatibility. Concretely, we bypass the following limitation: The notation "{ ' pat | P }" broke the parsing of expressions of the form "{ forall x, P } + { Q }". Indeed the latter works thanks to a tolerance of Camlp5 in parsing "forall x, P" at level 200 while the rule asks to actually parse the interior of "{ ... }" at level 99 (the reason for 99 is to be below the rule for "M : T" which is at level 100, so that "{ x : A | P }" does not see "x : A" as a cast). Adding an extra "'"; pat = pattern in parallel to c = constr LEVEL "99" broke the tolerance for constr at level 200. We fix this by adding an ad hoc rule for "{ binder_constr }" in the native grammar (g_constr.ml4). Actually, this is inconsistent with having a rule for "{ constr at level 99 }" in Notations.v. We should have both rules in Notations.v or both rules hard-wired in the native grammar. But I still don't know what is the best decision to take, so leaving as it at the current time. Advantages of hard-wiring both rules in g_constr.ml4: a bit simpler in metasyntax.ml (no need to ensure that the rule exist). Disadvantages: if one wants a different initial state without the business needing the "{ }" for sumbool, sumor, sig, sigT, one still have the rules there. Advantages of having them in Notations.v: more modular, we can change the initial state. Disadvantages: one would need a new kind of modifier, something like "x at level 99 || binder_constr", with all the difficulty to find a nice, intuitive, name for "binder_constr", and the difficulty of understanding if there is a generality to this "||" disjunction operator, and whether it should be documented or not. --- test-suite/output/Notations3.v | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'test-suite/output') diff --git a/test-suite/output/Notations3.v b/test-suite/output/Notations3.v index f41ddac4d..c98bfff41 100644 --- a/test-suite/output/Notations3.v +++ b/test-suite/output/Notations3.v @@ -341,8 +341,6 @@ Check fun x => if x is n.+1 then n else 1. (* Examples with binding patterns *) -Import SpecifPatternNotations. - Check {'(x,y)|x+y=0}. Module D. -- cgit v1.2.3