From bc6e87572b33eb5d98cbb23522a71fd7d23931b7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jason Gross Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 08:51:59 -0400 Subject: Grammar: "allowing to" is not proper English I'm not quite sure why, but I'm pretty sure it's not. Rather, in "allowing for foo" and "allowing to foo", "foo" modifies the sense in which someting is allowed, rather than it being "foo" that's allowed. "Allowing fooing" generally works, though it can sound a bit awkward. "Allowing one to foo" (or "Allowing {him,her,it,Coq} to foo") is always acceptable, in-as-much as it's ok to use "one". I haven't touched the older instances of it in the CHANGES file. --- plugins/extraction/README | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'plugins/extraction') diff --git a/plugins/extraction/README b/plugins/extraction/README index 64c871fd3..a9a7b04d5 100644 --- a/plugins/extraction/README +++ b/plugins/extraction/README @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ What is it ? ------------ -The extraction is a mechanism allowing to produce functional code +The extraction is a mechanism that produces functional code (Ocaml/Haskell/Scheme) out of any Coq terms (either programs or proofs). -- cgit v1.2.3