| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Currently, if one of the inductives is non recursive, it defaults to a
case analysis schems taking fewer predicates and methods just for that
inductive. This irregularity prevents doing a combined scheme afterwards
to gather all eliminators into one, as combined scheme expects all the
eliminators to have the same predicates and methods. I have a use case
in building function graphs in Equations where some of the inductives
might not be recursive but I expect many other use cases could exist.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We follow the suggestions in #402 and turn uses of `Loc.located` in
`vernac` into `CAst.t`. The impact should be low as this change mostly
affects top-level vernaculars.
With this change, we are even closer to automatically map a text
document to its AST in a programmatic way.
|
| |
|
|
| |
We do up to `Term` which is the main bulk of the changes.
|
| |
|
|
| |
This will allow to merge back `Names` with `API.Names`
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
When we used to parse to a glob_sort but always give an empty list in
the GType case we can now parse directly to Sorts.family.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
|
|
Currently, the STM, vernac interpretation, and the toplevel are
intertwined in a mutual dependency that needs to be resolved using
imperative callbacks.
This is problematic for a few reasons, in particular it makes the
interpretation of commands that affect the document quite intricate.
As a first step, we split the `toplevel/` directory into two: "pure"
vernac interpretation is moved to the `vernac/` directory, on which
the STM relies.
Test suite passes, and only one command seems to be disabled with this
approach, "Show Script" which is to my understanding
obsolete. Subsequent commits will fix this and refine some of the
invariants that are not needed anymore.
|
Matthieu Sozeau
Emilio Jesus Gallego Arias
Théo Zimmermann
Gaëtan Gilbert
Pierre-Marie Pédrot