| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|\ |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
|\| |
|
| | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This option disallows "declare at first use" semantics for universe
variables (in @{}), forcing the declaration of _all_ universes appearing
in a definition when introducing it with syntax Definition/Inductive
foo@{i j k} .. The bound universes at the end of a definition/inductive
must be exactly those ones, no extras allowed currently.
Test-suite files using the old semantics just disable the option.
|
|\| |
|
|\ \ |
|
| | | |
|
| |/ |
|
| | |
|
|\| |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
out to me by Pierre B.
Also extending use of bullets in Vectors where relevant.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
|\| |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Sorry so much.
Reverted:
707bfd5719b76d131152a258d49740165fbafe03.
164637cc3a4e8895ed4ec420e300bd692d3e7812.
b9c96c601a8366b75ee8b76d3184ee57379e2620.
21e41af41b52914469885f40155702f325d5c786.
7532f3243ba585f21a8f594d3dc788e38dfa2cb8.
27fb880ab6924ec20ce44aeaeb8d89592c1b91cd.
fe340267b0c2082b3af8bc965f7bc0e86d1c3c2c.
d9b13d0a74bc0c6dff4bfc61e61a3d7984a0a962.
6737055d165c91904fc04534bee6b9c05c0235b1.
342fed039e53f00ff8758513149f8d41fa3a2e99.
21525bae8801d98ff2f1b52217d7603505ada2d2.
b78d86d50727af61e0c4417cf2ef12cbfc73239d.
979de570714d340aaab7a6e99e08d46aa616e7da.
f556da10a117396c2c796f6915321b67849f65cd.
d8226295e6237a43de33475f798c3c8ac6ac4866.
fdab811e58094accc02875c1f83e6476f4598d26.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
|\| |
|
| | |
|
|\|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Conflicts:
tactics/eauto.ml4
(merging eauto.ml4 and adapting coq_micromega.ml to new typing.ml API)
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
List.nth_error and List.hd_error were the only remaining places in
the whole stdlib to use type "Exc" instead of "option" directly.
So let's simplify things and use option everywhere. In particular,
during teaching sessions about lists, we won't have anymore to explain
the (lack of) difference between Exc,value,error and option,Some,None.
This might cause a few incompatibilities in proof scripts, if they
syntactically expect "value" or "error" to occur, but this should
hopefully be very rare and quite easy to fix.
|
| | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
(see #3695).
|
|\| |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
equalities in configurations like
x=y
x=z
===
P(x,y,z)
where it now produces
===
P(z,z,z)
In particular (equations are processed from most ancient to most recent).
Thanks to this, a "repeat subst" can just be a "subst" in List.v.
Incidentally: moved a nf_enter to enter in subst_one, since the latter
is normally called from other tactics having normalized evars.
|
|\| |
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Since [map_ext_in] is more general, no need to have the same proof twice.
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Slightly broader version of the existing [map_ext]: two [map] expressions
are equal if their respective functions agree on all arguments that are
in the list being mapped.
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
spurious quantification on unused universes.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Most of them are backports of improvements already there in
FSetPositive when compared with the original FMapPositive file.
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
replacement for 8.4's "Require Omega").
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Closes #57.
|
|\| |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
- no more inconsistent Axiom in the Prelude
- STM can now process Admitted proofs asynchronously
- the quick chain can stock "Admitted" jobs in .vio files
- the vio2vo step checks the jobs but does not stock the result
in the opaque tables (they have no slot)
- Admitted emits a warning if the proof is complete
- Admitted uses the (partial) proof term to infer section variables
used (if not given with Proof using), like for Qed
- test-suite: extra line Require TestSuite.admit to each file making
use of admit
- test-suite/_CoqProject: to pass to CoqIDE and PG the right -Q flag to
find TestSuite.admit
|
| | |
|
|\| |
|
| | |
|
|\| |
|
| | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
NB: this is work-in-progress, there is currently only one
provided implementation (MMapWeakList).
In the same spirit as MSets w.r.t FSets, the main difference between
MMaps and former FMaps is the use of a new version of OrderedType
(see Orders.v instead of obsolete OrderedType.v).
We also try to benefit more from recent notions such as Proper.
For most function specifications, the style has changed : we now use
equations over "find" instead of "MapsTo" predicates, whenever possible
(cf. Maps in Compcert for a source of inspiration). Former specs are
now derived in FMapFacts, so this is mostly a matter of taste.
Two changes inspired by the current Maps of OCaml:
- "elements" is now "bindings"
- "map2" is now "merge" (and its function argument also receives a key).
We now use a maximal implicit argument for "empty".
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
NB: this is work-in-progress, there is currently only one
provided implementation (MMapWeakList).
In the same spirit as MSets w.r.t FSets, the main difference between
MMaps and former FMaps is the use of a new version of OrderedType
(see Orders.v instead of obsolete OrderedType.v).
We also try to benefit more from recent notions such as Proper.
For most function specifications, the style has changed : we now use
equations over "find" instead of "MapsTo" predicates, whenever possible
(cf. Maps in Compcert for a source of inspiration). Former specs are
now derived in FMapFacts, so this is mostly a matter of taste.
Two changes inspired by the current Maps of OCaml:
- "elements" is now "bindings"
- "map2" is now "merge" (and its function argument also receives a key).
We now use a maximal implicit argument for "empty".
|
|\| |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This reverts commit 4e6c9891140932f452bb5ac8960d597b0b5fde1d, which was
breaking compatibility because one could no longer use names of foralls in
the goal without introducting them. Probably not good style, but it did
break many existing developments including CompCert.
Closes #4093 but reopens #4035.
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Due to the way it was laid out, the tactic could prove neither
(Zle x x) nor (P /\ Q -> P) nor (P |- P /\ True)
yet it could prove
(Zle x x /\ True) and (P /\ Q |- P).
|