| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|---|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@15715 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
See NatInt/NZBits.v for the common axiomatization of bitwise functions
over naturals / integers. Some specs aren't pretty, but easier to
prove, see alternate statements in property functors {N,Z}Bits.
Negative numbers are considered via the two's complement convention.
We provide implementations for N (in Ndigits.v), for nat (quite dummy,
just for completeness), for Z (new file Zdigits_def), for BigN
(for the moment partly by converting to N, to be improved soon)
and for BigZ.
NOTA: For BigN.shiftl and BigN.shiftr, the two arguments are now in
the reversed order (for consistency with the rest of the world):
for instance BigN.shiftl 1 10 is 2^10.
NOTA2: Zeven.Zdiv2 is _not_ doing (Zdiv _ 2), but rather (Zquot _ 2)
on negative numbers. For the moment I've kept it intact, and have
just added a Zdiv2' which is truly equivalent to (Zdiv _ 2).
To reorganize someday ?
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@13689 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Initially, I was using notation 1 := (S 0) and so on. But then, when
implementing by NArith or ZArith, some lemmas statements were filled
with Nsucc's and Zsucc's instead of 1 and 2's.
Concerning BigN, things are rather complicated: zero, one, two
aren't inlined during the functor application creating BigN.
This is deliberate, at least for the other operations like BigN.add.
And anyway, since zero, one, two are defined too early in NMake,
we don't have 0%bigN in the body of BigN.zero but something complex that
reduce to 0%bigN, same for one and two. Fortunately, apply or
rewrite of generic lemmas seem to work, even if there's BigZ.zero
on one side and 0 on the other...
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@13555 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
|
|
- Simplification of functor names, e.g. ZFooProp instead of ZFooPropFunct
- The axiomatisations of the different fonctions are now in {N,Z}Axioms.v
apart for Z division (three separate flavours in there own files).
Content of {N,Z}AxiomsSig is extended, old version is {N,Z}AxiomsMiniSig.
- In NAxioms, the recursion field isn't that useful, since we axiomatize
other functions and not define them (apart in the toy NDefOps.v).
We leave recursion there, but in a separate NAxiomsFullSig.
- On Z, the pow function is specified to behave as Zpower : a^(-1)=0
- In BigN/BigZ, (power:t->N->t) is now pow_N, while pow is t->t->t
These pow could be more clever (we convert 2nd arg to N and use pow_N).
Default "^" is now (pow:t->t->t). BigN/BigZ ring is adapted accordingly
- In BigN, is_even is now even, its spec is changed to use Zeven_bool.
We add an odd. In BigZ, we add even and odd.
- In ZBinary (implem of ZAxioms by ZArith), we create an efficient Zpow
to implement pow. This Zpow should replace the current linear Zpower
someday.
- In NPeano (implem of NAxioms by Arith), we create pow, even, odd functions,
and we modify the div and mod functions for them to be linear, structural,
tail-recursive.
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@13546 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
Maxime Dénès
herbelin
letouzey