| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|---|
| |\ |
|
| |\ \ |
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
This fixes #5675 (in yet another way).
The issue was that `$` (end of string regex) was not properly escaped in
`"`s.
This handles the issue that is displayed in
```
cat A.v.timing.diff
After | Code | Before || Change | % Change
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0m01.44s | Total | 0m01.56s || -0m00.12s | -7.92%
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0m00.609s | Chars 163 - 208 [Definition~foo1~:=~Eval~comp~i...] | 0m00.627s || -0m00.01s | -2.87%
0m00.527s | Chars 069 - 162 [Definition~foo0~:=~Eval~comp~i...] | 0m00.552s || -0m00.02s | -4.52%
0m00.304s | Chars 000 - 026 [Require~Coq.ZArith.BinInt.] | 0m00.379s || -0m00.07s | -19.78%
N/A | Chars 027 - 068 [Declare~Reduction~comp~:=~nati...] | 0m00.006s || -0m00.00s | -100.00%
0m00.s | Chars 027 - 068 [Declare~Reduction~comp~:=~vm_c...] | N/A || +0m00.00s | N/A
--- A.v.timing.diff.desired.processed 2018-03-23 22:22:19.000000000 +0000
+++ A.v.timing.diff.processed 2018-03-23 22:22:19.000000000 +0000
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
- N/A | Chars 27 - 68 [Declare~Reduction~comp~:=~nati] | ms || -ms | N/A
+ N/A | Chars 27 - 68 [Declare~Reduction~comp~:=~nati] | ms || -ms | -%
------
------
After | Code | Before || Change | % Change
```
where, because `Declare Reduction` takes 0.006s rather than 0s, the %
change shows up as -100% rather than N/A.
|
| |/ / |
|
| |\ \ |
|
| | | | |
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Constrextern.explicitize expected that if implicits were declared they
would be declared at least up to the principal argument of the
projection, but Context/discharge of implicits does not preserve this.
Note the anomaly only happens with primitive projections DISABLED in
recent Coqs (>=8.8).
Implicit argument experts may consider whether ensuring enough
implicits are declared would be better.
|
| | |/
|/|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
We use a lower level function that accesses the proof without raising an
anomaly. This is a direct candidate for backport, so I used a V82 API but
eventually this API should be cleaned up.
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This is done by not failing for fix/cofix while translating from
glob_constr to constr_pattern.
|
| |\ \ |
|
| |\ \ \ |
|
| | | |/ |
|
| | |/
|/|
| |
| | |
For instance, error in "Goal forall a f, f a = 0" is now located.
|
| |/
|
|
| |
Closes #6793.
|
| |\ |
|
| |\ \
| | |
| | |
| | | |
deciding…
|
| | |/
|/|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
We expected `nparams + nrealargs + consnrealargs` but the `nrealargs`
should not be there. This breaks cumulativity of constructors for any
inductive with indices (so records still work, explaining why the test
case in #6747 works).
|
| |\ \ |
|
| | |/
|/|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
notation to use among several of them"
This reverts commit 9cac9db6446b31294d2413d920db0eaa6dd5d8a6, reversing
changes made to 2f679ec5235257c9fd106c26c15049e04523a307.
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
When comparing 2 irrelevant universes [u] and [v] we add a "weak
constraint" [UWeak(u,v)] to the UState. Then at minimization time a
weak constraint between unrelated universes where one is flexible
causes them to be unified.
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
In Reductionops.infer_conv we did not have enough information to
properly try to unify irrelevant universes. This requires changing the
Reduction.universe_compare type a bit.
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Previously [fun x : Ind@{i} => x : Ind@{j}] with Ind some cumulative
inductive would try to generate a constraint [i = j] and use
cumulativity only if this resulted in an inconsistency. This is
confusingly different from the behaviour with [Type] and means
cumulativity can only be used to lift between universes related by
strict inequalities. (This isn't a kernel restriction so there might
be some workaround to send the kernel the right constraints, but
not in a nice way.)
See modified test for more details of what is now possible.
Technical notes:
When universe constraints were inferred by comparing the shape of
terms without reduction, cumulativity was not used and so too-strict
equality constraints were generated. Then in order to use cumulativity
we had to make this comparison fail to fall back to full conversion.
When unifiying 2 instances of a cumulative inductive type, if there
are any Irrelevant universes we try to unify them if they are
flexible.
|
| |\ \
| |/
|/| |
|
| |\ \ |
|
| | | | |
|
| | |/
|/| |
|
| |\ \ |
|
| |\ \ \ |
|
| |\ \ \ \ |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ |
|
| | | | | | | | |
|
| | |/ / / / /
|/| | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Tactic-in-term can be called from within a tactic itself. We have to
preserve the preexisting future_goals (if called from pretyping) and
we have to inform of the existence of pending goals, using
future_goals which is the only way to tell it in the absence of being
part of an encapsulating proofview.
This fixes #6313.
Conversely, future goals, created by pretyping, can call ltac:(giveup) or
ltac:(shelve), and this has to be remembered. So, we do it.
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ \ |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
wish #4129)
|
| | |_|_|_|_|_|_|/
|/| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Following up on #6791, we remove support refolding in reduction.
We also update a test case that was not properly understood, see the
discussion in #6895.
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Since 4eb6d29d1ca7e0cc28d59d19a50adb83f7b30a2a universe binders were
declared twice for all records.
Since 4fcf1fa32ff395d6bd5f6ce4803eee18173c4d36 this causes an
observable error for monomorphic records.
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
We limit fixpoints to Finite inductive types, so that BiFinite
inductives (non-recursive records) are excluded from fixpoint
construction. This is a regression in the sense that e.g. fixpoints
on unit records were allowed before. Primitive records with
eta-conversion are included in the BiFinite types.
Fix deprecation
Fix error message, the inductive type needs to be recursive for fix to work
|
| | | | | | | |/
| | | | | |/| |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ \
| |_|_|_|_|/ /
|/| | | | | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ \ |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Attempt to extract the current ongoing proof (request by
Clément Pit-Claudel on coqdev, and also #4129).
Evars are handled as axioms.
|
| | |_|_|_|/ / / / / / / /
|/| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Following up on #6791, we the option "Shrink Abstract".
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
a record.
|
Hugo Herbelin
Pierre-Marie Pédrot
Jason Gross
Jasper Hugunin
Gaëtan Gilbert
Emilio Jesus Gallego Arias
Enrico Tassi
Maxime Dénès
charguer
Matthieu Sozeau
Matthieu Sozeau
Pierre Letouzey