| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
breaking backtracking in the presence of functors).
In "interactive" rather than "bugs" because of the use of Back.
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@16832 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
|
|
|
| |
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@16740 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Simple framework for remote counters. The slaves ask
the master for a fresh value. On the master the thread
manager answers with a bunch of fresh values (so that further
requests can be immediately satisfied).
Remote counters are guarded with a mutex on the master,
because all slave managers as well as the master thread
can access the counter at the same time.
I know the name sucks. These counters are remote for the slaves,
and local for the master. I'm open to suggestions...
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@16713 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
|
|
|
| |
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@16681 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
|
|
|
| |
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@12337 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Declare Implicit Tactic support)
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@9165 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
|
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@7486 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|